A¹ homotopy theory


In algebraic geometry and algebraic topology, branches of mathematics, homotopy theory is a way to apply the techniques of algebraic topology, specifically homotopy, to algebraic varieties and, more generally, to schemes. The theory is due to Fabien Morel and Vladimir Voevodsky. The underlying idea is that it should be possible to develop a purely algebraic approach to homotopy theory by replacing the unit interval, which is not an algebraic variety, with the affine line, which is. The theory requires a substantial amount of technique to set up, but has spectacular applications such as Voevodsky's construction of the derived category of mixed motives and the proof of the Milnor and Bloch-Kato conjectures.

Construction

homotopy theory is founded on a category called the homotopy category. This is the homotopy category for a certain closed model category whose construction requires two steps.

Step 1

Most of the construction works for any site. Assume that the site is subcanonical, and let be the category of sheaves of sets on this site. This category is too restrictive, so we will need to enlarge it. Let be the simplex category, that is, the category whose objects are the sets
and whose morphisms are order-preserving functions. We let denote the category of functors. That is, is the category of simplicial objects on. Such an object is also called a simplicial sheaf on. The category of all simplicial sheaves on is a Grothendieck topos.
A point of a site is a geometric morphism, where is the category of sets. We will define a closed model structure on in terms of points. Let be a morphism of simplicial sheaves. We say that:
The homotopy category of this model structure is denoted.

Step 2

This model structure will not give the right homotopy category because it does not pay any attention to the unit interval object. Call this object, and denote the final object of by. We assume that comes with a map and two maps such that:
Now we localize the homotopy theory with respect to. A simplicial sheaf is called -local if for any simplicial sheaf the map
induced by is a bijection. A morphism is an -weak equivalence if for any -local, the induced map
is a bijection. The homotopy theory of the site with interval is the localization of with respect to -weak equivalences. This category is called.

Formal Definition

Finally we may define the homotopy category.
Note that by construction, for any in, there is an isomorphism
in the homotopy category.

Properties of the theory

The setup, especially the Nisnevich topology, is chosen as to make algebraic K-theory representable by a spectrum, and in some aspects to make a proof of the Bloch-Kato conjecture possible.
After the Morel-Voevodsky construction there have been several different approaches to homotopy theory by using other model category structures or by using other sheaves than Nisnevich sheaves. Each of these constructions yields the same homotopy category.
There are two kinds of spheres in the theory: those coming from the multiplicative group playing the role of the -sphere in topology, and those coming from the simplicial sphere. This leads to a theory of motivic spheres with two indices. To compute the homotopy groups of motivic spheres would also yield the classical stable homotopy groups of the spheres, so in this respect homotopy theory is at least as complicated as classical homotopy theory.

The stable homotopy category

A further construction in A1-homotopy theory is the category SH, which is obtained from the above unstable category by forcing the smash product with Gm to become invertible. This process can be carried out either using model-categorical constructions using so-called Gm-spectra or alternatively using infinity-categories.
For S = Spec, the spectrum of the field of real numbers, there is a functor
to the stable homotopy category from algebraic topology. The functor is characterized by sending a smooth scheme X / R to the real manifold associated to X. This functor has the property that it sends the map
to an equivalence, since is homotopy equivalent to a two-point set. has shown that the resulting functor
is an equivalence.

Survey Articles

*