Aballava


Aballava or Aballaba was a Roman fort on Hadrian's Wall, between Petriana to the east and Coggabata to the west. It is about one and a half miles south of the Solway Firth, and its purpose was to guard the south end of two important Solway fords, the Peat Wath and the Sandwath, which were also to become favourite routes for medieval border raiders.

Description

The fort is five and a half miles west of Stanwix. The word 'Aballava' means 'Orchard', if abal- is from the Proto Brythonic *abalon apple.
The fort was an oblong, straddling the Wall, and measured north to south by east to west, occupying an area of. Only the location of the eastern wall is known for certain. It is believed that it was built over the site of turret 71b. There is a fortified border church on the site built almost entirely of Roman stones, and it is believed that this stands on the site of the principia of the fort.
There was a vicus to the south-west of the fort, and it is believed that a cemetery existed to the south of the fort.

Garrison

The second-century garrison was the Ala I Tungrorum, followed by a mixed cavalry regiment, Cohors I Nerviorum. The third-century garrison was a mounted detachment of Frisians, followed by an infantry detachment of Aurelian Moors.

Excavations

Excavations were carried out in 1922, during which it was established that the fort straddled the Wall.
Two other forts were found on the same site, by aerial photography, in 1976 and 1977. The second fort, discovered in 1976, and excavated 13 years earlier, is thought to pre-date Hadrian's Wall. It has been claimed that this fort was an extension to the Stanegate system of forts, but this is largely conjecture.
A small scale excavation 200 metres south of the fort undertaken by Headland Archaeology uncovered a group of features associated with the vicus. Features included post-pits for a substantial building, postholes and beamslots relating to other timber buildings and shallow ditches and gullies; all dated to the mid-2nd century. There was no evidence for the later 2nd and 3rd century occupation identified during the previous investigations, suggesting some discontinuity in the use of the site.

In fiction