Alvarezsauroidea


Alvarezsauroidea is a group of small maniraptoran dinosaurs. Alvarezsauroidea, Alvarezsauridae, and Alvarezsauria are named for the historian Gregorio Álvarez, not the more familiar physicist Luis Alvarez, who proposed that the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event was caused by an impact event. The group was first formally proposed by Choiniere and colleagues in 2010, to contain the family Alvarezsauridae and non-alvarezsaurid alvarezsauroids, such as Haplocheirus, which is the basalmost of the Alvarezsauroidea. The discovery of Haplocheirus extended the stratigraphic evidence for the group Alvarezsauroidea about 63 million years further in the past. The division of Alvarezsauroidea into the Alvarezsauridae and the non-alvarezsaurid alvarezsauroids is based on differences in their morphology, especially in their hand morphology.

Introduction

The first fossil alvarezsauroids were recognized in the 1990s. Since then, the number of specimens found has dramatically increased. Most of the recent alvarezsauroids are found in China, but they are also known from the Americas and Europe. They existed from the Late Jurassic to the Late Cretaceous. The basalmost and oldest alvarezsauroid of the Chinese alvarezsaurs is from the Shishugou Formation in Xinjiang. Additionally, two derived members of the derived alvarezsaur group Parvicursorinae are known from the Inner Mongolia and Henan.
The size of the derived members of Alvarezsauroidea range between, but some members may have been larger. Haplocheirus, for example, was the largest member of the Alvarezsauroidea. Because of the size of Haplocheirus and its basal phylogenetic position, a pattern of miniaturization for the Alvarezsauroidea is suggested. Miniaturizations are very rare in dinosaurs, but convergently evolved in Paraves.

Classification

The phylogenetic placement of Alvarezsauroidea is still unclear. At first, they were interpreted as a sister group of Avialae or nested within the group Avialae and considered to be flightless birds, because they share many morphological characteristics with them, such as a loosely sutured skull, a keeled sternum, fused wrist elements, and a posteriorly directed pubis. But this association was reevaluated after the discovery of the primitive forms like Haplocheirus, Patagonykus and Alvarezsaurus, which do not show all bird-like features as the first discovered species Mononykus and Shuvuuia. This shows that bird-like characteristics were developed multiple times within the Maniraptora. Furthermore, the Alvarezsauroidea had simplified homogenous dentition, convergent with that of some extant insectivorous mammals. More recently, they have been placed within the Coelurosauria basal to the Maniraptora or as a sister taxa of Ornithomimosauria within the Ornithomimiformes.
The cladogram below is based on Choniere et al..

ImageSize = width:1000px height:auto barincrement:15px
PlotArea = left:10px bottom:50px top:10px right:10px
Period = from:1970 till:2040
TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal
ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:50 start:1970
ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:10 start:1970
TimeAxis = orientation:hor
AlignBars = justify
Colors =
#legends
id:CAR value:claret
id:ANK value:rgb
id:HER value:teal
id:HAD value:green
id:OMN value:blue
id:black value:black
id:white value:white
id:1900s value:rgb
id:2000s value:rgb
id:2000syears value:rgb
id:1900syears value:rgb
id:1700s value:rgb
id:1700syears value:rgb
id:latecretaceous value:rgb
id:1800syears value:rgb
id:paleogene value:rgb
id:paleocene value:rgb
id:eocene value:rgb
id:oligocene value:rgb
id:1800s value:rgb
id:miocene value:rgb
id:pliocene value:rgb
id:quaternary value:rgb
id:pleistocene value:rgb
id:holocene value:rgb
BarData=
bar:eratop
bar:space
bar:periodtop
bar:space
bar:NAM1
bar:NAM2
bar:NAM3
bar:NAM4
bar:NAM5
bar:NAM6
bar:NAM7
bar:NAM8
bar:NAM9
bar:NAM10
bar:space
bar:period
bar:space
bar:era
PlotData=
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark: width:25
shift:

bar:periodtop
from: 1970 till: 1980 color:1900syears text:70s
from: 1980 till: 1990 color:1900syears text:80s
from: 1990 till: 2000 color:1900syears text:90s
from: 2000 till: 2010 color:2000syears text:00s
from: 2010 till: 2020 color:2000syears text:10s
from: 2020 till: 2030 color:2000syears text:20s
from: 2030 till: 2040 color:2000syears text:30s
bar:eratop
from: 1970 till: 2000 color:1900s text:20th
from: 2000 till: 2040 color:2000s text:21st
PlotData=
align:left fontsize:M mark: width:5 anchor:till align:left
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:1973 mark: text:Tugulusaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:1991 mark: text:Alvarezsaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM2 at:2018 mark: text:Bannykus
color:1900s bar:NAM2 at:1975 mark: text:Heptasteornis
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:2018 mark: text:Xiyunykus
color:1900s bar:NAM2 at:2009 mark: text:Kol
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:2007 mark: text:Achillesaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM9 at:2012 mark: text:Bonapartenykus
color:1800s bar:NAM3 at:1996 mark: text:Patagonykus
color:1900s bar:NAM4 at:1996 mark: text:Parvicursor
color:1900s bar:NAM7 at:2011 mark: text:Albinykus
color:1800s bar:NAM3 at:2009 mark: text:Ceratonykus
color:1800s bar:NAM6 at:2010 mark: text:Xixianykus
color:1900s bar:NAM4 at:2009 mark: text:Albertonykus
color:1800s bar:NAM8 at:2011 mark: text:Linhenykus
color:1900s bar:NAM2 at:1993 mark: text:Mononykus
color:1900s bar:NAM5 at:1998 mark: text:Shuvuuia
color:1900s bar:NAM10 at:2012 mark: text:Alnashetri
color:1900s bar:NAM5 at:2010 mark: text:Haplocheirus
color:1900s bar:NAM3 at:2019 mark: text:Shishugounykus
PlotData=
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark: width:25
bar:period
from: 1970 till: 1980 color:1900syears text:70s
from: 1980 till: 1990 color:1900syears text:80s
from: 1990 till: 2000 color:1900syears text:90s
from: 2000 till: 2010 color:2000syears text:00s
from: 2010 till: 2020 color:2000syears text:10s
from: 2020 till: 2030 color:2000syears text:20s
from: 2030 till: 2040 color:2000syears text:30s
bar:era
from: 1970 till: 2000 color:1900s text:20th
from: 2000 till: 2040 color:2000s text:21st

Geographical distribution

At first, alvarezsauroids were thought to have been originated in South America. However, the discovery of Haplocheirus, and its basal phylogenetic position, as well as its early temporal position, suggests they derived in Asia rather than South America. Xu et al. suggested that at least three dispersal events of alvarezsauroids took place; one from Asia to Gondwana, one from Gondwana to Asia, and one from Asia to North America. This hypothesis is consistent with faunal interchanges. On the other hand, some theropod groups are inconsistent with this hypothesis. Xu et al. used event−based tree−fitting to perform a quantitative analysis of alvarezsauroid biogeography. Their results showed an absence of statistical support for previous biogeographic hypotheses that favour pure vicariance or pure dispersal scenarios as explanations for the distributions of alvarezsauroids across South America, North America and Asia. They instead found that statistically significant biogeographic reconstructions suggest a dominant role for sympatric events, combined with a mix of vicariance, dispersal and regional extinction. The Asian origin of alvarezsauroids is also bolstered by the discovery of alvarezsaurid specimens from the Turonian-age Bissekty Formation of Uzbekistan and Bannykus, Tugulusaurus, and Xiyunykus from the Early Cretaceous of China.

Hand morphology

The differences in the morphology of the hand of basic Alvarezsauroidea and the derived members are characterized by digit reduction. In the evolution of theropod dinosaurs, modifications of the hand were typical. The digital reduction, for instance, is a striking evolutionary phenomenon that is clearly exemplified in theropod dinosaurs. The enlargement of the manual digit II in alvarezsauroids and the concurrent reduction of the lateral digits, created one functional medial digit and two very small, and presumably vestigial, lateral digits. These morphological changes have been interpreted as adaptations for digging.
One possible interpretation suggests that the alvarezsauroids feed on insects, using their hand to search beyond the tree bark. This interpretation is consistent with their long, elongate snout and small teeth. Another interpretation suggests that they used their claws to break into ant and termite colonies. But the arm anatomy of an alvarezsaurid would require the animal to lie on its chest against a termite nest.
In contrast to the digit reduction of the hand of derived alvarezsauroid to a claw used for digging, Haplocheirus was still able to grab things. However, Haplocheirus already shows the enlargement of the second manual digit. Important data on the evolution of the alvarezsauroid hand is also provided by the basal parvicursorine Linhenykus.
Another difference between Alvarezsauridae and Haplocheirus is the dentition. While alvarezsauroids show a simplified homogenous dentition, Haplocheirus on the other side possesses recurved serrated teeth. The dentition of Haplocheirus and their basal phylogenetic position, suggest that carnivory was the primitive condition for the clade. Furthermore, Haplocheirus possesses more teeth on the maxilla than other alvarezsauroids.