August, is a novel written by Judith Rossner focused on a psychoanalyst and one of her analysands. The title refers to the month of August, when analysts leave the city for the month and thus leave some of their patients without the emotional support of the analytic relationship.
Plot introduction
The novel focuses on the relationship between a psychoanalyst, Dr. Lulu Shinefield, and a young troubled woman, Dawn Henley, from the beginning of their therapy together through to its termination.
Characters
Lulu Kagan Shinefield: Main character and psychoanalyst which the book centers on
Anita Kagan: Lulu's mother
George Kagan: Lulu's father
Luther "Woody" Samuelson: Lulu's first husband
Sascha Shinefield: Lulu's daughter by her first husband
Nathan Shinefield: Lulu's second husband
Teddy Shinefield: Lulu's son by her second husband
Walden Shinefield: Lulu's son by her second husband
Bonnie and Duke Mayer: Friends of Lulu's and fellow analysts
Alan Gartner: Dawn's early boyfriend and biological father of her aborted child
Rob Grace: Another boyfriend of Dawn's
Tom Grace: Another of Dawn's lovers, and father to Rob Grace
Bill Denton: Another boyfriend of Dawn's
Jack Stewart: Final boyfriend of Dawn's mentioned in the novel
Polly Campbell, Lillian, Jessica Rubenstein, Sandy: Friends of Dawn's
Reception
The New York Times reviewer Walter Kendrick praised the book for "almost photographic realism" in showing life on Manhattan's Upper West Side and in East Hampton, as well as its depiction of the relationship between analyst and patient. The reviewer concluded, "I know of no other account, imagined or factual, that gives such a vivid picture of the analytic experience, on both sides of its intense, troubled, ambiguous relationship." Norman N. Holland, in his 1990 Holland's Guide to Psychoanalytic Psychology and Literature-and-Psychology, wrote that August, though a "pop novel", provided an "accurate picture of a New York psychoanalysis today" and "a fascinating study of separation anxiety". UPI reviewer David R. Schweisberg likewise credited the book's writing and its portrayal of psychology, but he felt that Rossner had pursued "realism and nuance at the expense of leaving the reader behind", making the book "boring".
