Grothendieck's proof of the theorem is based on proving the analogous theorem for finite fields and their algebraic closures. That is, for any field F that is itself finite or that is the closure of a finite field, if a polynomialP from Fn to itself is injective then it is bijective. If F is a finite field, then Fn is finite. In this case the theorem is true for trivial reasons having nothing to do with the representation of the function as a polynomial: any injection of a finite set to itself is a bijection. When F is the algebraic closure of a finite field, the result follows fromHilbert's Nullstellensatz. The Ax–Grothendieck theorem for complex numbers can therefore be proven by showing that a counterexample over C would translate into a counterexample in some algebraic extension of a finite field. This method of proof is noteworthy in that it is an example of the idea that finitistic algebraic relations in fields of characteristic 0 translate into algebraic relations over finite fields with large characteristic. Thus, one can use the arithmetic of finite fields to prove a statement about C even though there is no homomorphism from any finite field to C. The proof thus uses model-theoretic principles to prove an elementary statement about polynomials. The proof for the general case uses a similar method.
Other proofs
There are other proofs of the theorem. Armand Borel gave a proof using topology. The case of n = 1 and field C follows since C is algebraically closed and can also be thought of as a special case of the result that for any analytic functionf on C, injectivity of f implies surjectivity of f. This is a corollary of Picard's theorem.
Related results
Another example of reducing theorems about morphisms of finite type to finite fields can be found in EGA IV: There, it is proved that a radicialS-endomorphism of a scheme X of finite type over S is bijective, and that if X/S is of finite presentation, and the endomorphism is a monomorphism, then it is an automorphism. Therefore, a scheme of finite presentation over a base S is a cohopfian object in the category of S-schemes. The Ax–Grothendieck theorem may also be used to prove the Garden of Eden theorem, a result that like the Ax–Grothendieck theorem relates injectivity with surjectivity but in cellular automata rather than in algebraic fields. Although direct proofs of this theorem are known, the proof via the Ax–Grothendieck theorem extends more broadly, to automata acting on amenable groups. Some partial converses to the Ax-Grothendieck Theorem:
A generically surjective rational map of n-dimensional affine space over a Hilbertian field is generically bijective with a rational inverse defined over the same field.