The standard Gaussian measure γn on n-dimensional Euclidean spaceRn is not translation-invariant. Instead, a measurable subset A has Gaussian measure Here refers to the standard Euclidean dot product in Rn. The Gaussian measure of the translation of A by a vector h ∈ Rn is So under translation through h, the Gaussian measure scales by the distribution function appearing in the last display: The measure that associates to the set A the number γn is the pushforward measure, denoted ∗. Here Th : Rn → Rn refers to the translation map: Th = x + h. The above calculation shows that the Radon–Nikodym derivative of the pushforward measure with respect to the original Gaussian measure is given by The abstract Wiener measureγ on a separableBanach spaceE, where i : H → E is an abstract Wiener space, is also a "Gaussian measure" in a suitable sense. How does it change under translation? It turns out that a similar formula to the one above holds if we consider only translations by elements of the dense subspacei ⊆ E.
Statement of the theorem
Let i : H → E be an abstract Wiener space with abstract Wiener measure γ : Borel → . For h ∈ H, define Th : E → E by Th = x + i. Then ∗ is equivalent to γ with Radon–Nikodym derivative where denotes the Paley–Wiener integral. The Cameron–Martin formula is valid only for translations by elements of the densesubspacei ⊆ E, called Cameron–Martin space, and not by arbitrary elements of E. If the Cameron–Martin formula did hold for arbitrary translations, it would contradict the following result: In fact, γ is quasi-invariant under translation by an element v if and only if v ∈ i. Vectors in i are sometimes known as Cameron–Martin directions.
Integration by parts
The Cameron–Martin formula gives rise to an integration by parts formula on E: if F : E → R has boundedFréchet derivative DF : E → Lin = E∗, integrating the Cameron–Martin formula with respect to Wiener measure on both sides gives for any t ∈ R. Formally differentiating with respect to t and evaluating at t = 0 gives the integration by parts formula Comparison with the divergence theorem of vector calculussuggests where Vh : E → E is the constant "vector field" Vh = i for all x ∈ E. The wish to consider more general vector fields and to think of stochastic integrals as "divergences" leads to the study of stochastic processes and the Malliavin calculus, and, in particular, the Clark–Ocone theorem and its associated integration by parts formula.