Chowilla Dam
Chowilla Dam was a proposed water storage reservoir on the Murray River in the 1960s. The dam wall would have been in South Australia, but the reservoir behind it would have stretched upstream into Victoria and New South Wales. The site was selected in 1960. Early preparations for its construction were conducted before the project was halted. These included a 23 km service railway from the Barmera railway line, which was dismantled without ever actually being used.
Purpose
The dam was proposed to provide flood regulation and reliable water supplies for South Australia, which pumps water from the lower Murray through pipelines across the Mount Lofty Ranges to Adelaide, and parts of the Mid North, Yorke Peninsula and Eyre Peninsula. It was announced on 21 April 1960 by Tom Playford, the Premier of South Australia.Cross border agreement
It had been agreed by the River Murray Commission in September 1961 and governments of South Australia, Victoria, New South Wales and Australia in 1963. A preliminary meeting was held on 16 April 1962 to start discussion on Chowilla Dam. Participants in that meeting were Prime Minister of Australia Bob Menzies, Premier of South Australia Tom Playford, Premier of Victoria, Deputy Premier of New South Wales and Minister for Development Jack Renshaw, Treasurer of Australia Harold Holt, Minister for National Development Bill Spooner. The follow-up meeting at which an agreement was reached was held on 19 November 1962. Participants were Spooner and Menzies for the Commonwealth, Renshaw and George Enticknap for NSW, Premier of Victoria Henry Bolte and Premier of South Australia Thomas Playford. The four governments would share the costs evenly, however the Commonwealth would extend a loan for the New South Wales component in exchange for water from the Menindee Lakes during construction.Reservoir
The reservoir would have been long and up to wide with a surface area of due to the flat terrain. The dam wall would have been long and the reservoir depth up to with a capacity of. The reservoir would have been approximately in South Australia, in Victoria and in New South Wales.Engineering
The dam was proposed to be an earth embankment up to high and long. It would include a concrete spillway long and a navigation lock. The lock was removed to save cost in later versions of the plans before the project was cancelled. The embankment would block the Murray River and both Chowilla Creek and Monoman Creek in the Chowilla floodplain. Most of both the impervious core and the compacted sand shoulders of the dam embankment would be sourced from local materials of specific layers of soil. There would also be an deep cut-off wall under the concrete spillway and lock to reduce seepage.The plan to deal with the highly saline groundwater was to drill relief wells and drains, and pump it to evaporation ponds several miles away. This is similar to what has been done more recently at several points along the Murray for what are now known as "salt interception schemes". Rock would need to be transported from further away to provide protective riprap, filters, and aggregate in concrete and bituminous membrane. This would be transported by rail from away.
The South Australian Railways were engaged to transport the rock that was required. A railway line was built, branching from the Barmera line eight kilometres north of Yamba. Sixty FCD-class flatcars were constructed by Islington Railway Workshops to carry skips that could be taken off the train by crane to move the rock to where it was required. A siding near Kinchina Quarry between Murray Bridge and Monarto South was built to collect the stone. When the project was cancelled, the line had been completed except for laying of ballast and the terminal siding. Work to remove the line began in September 1972, with the track used to upgrade the Waikerie line.
Controversy
The dam and reservoir would have flooded the wetlands in what is now the Chowilla Game Reserve, Chowilla Regional Reserve and northern edge of the Murray-Sunset National Park and potentially raised salinity in the Riverland and lower Murray as the reservoir would have been quite shallow in a hot dry climate.The dam was first proposed and announced by Tom Playford, the Liberal and Country League premier of South Australia in 1960. Playford's government had been in office since 1938, and through that time had presided over significant economic and infrastructure development in the state. This had included encouraging new industries, establishing satellite cities around Adelaide, nationalising the electricity generators and stimulating self-sufficiency by using Leigh Creek brown coal instead of importing black coal from interstate. The Chowilla Dam would have continued this theme by providing greater certainty and control over water supplies as Adelaide's water requirements were increasing.
Playford and the LCL won the 1962 state election only with the support of independent Tom Stott in an otherwise-hung parliament. Stott was a strong supporter of building the dam, which would be in his electorate. The Frank Walsh-led Australian Labor Party won the 1965 election. After leadership changes in both parties, the LCL led by Steele Hall defeated the ALP led by Don Dunstan in the 1968 election again through the support of Stott.
Hall became convinced that the Chowilla Dam was not a good idea and favoured agreements for water supply from Dartmouth Dam instead. This was due to a combination of the increasing cost estimates of building the dam, and the increasing awareness of the environmental impacts of the proposed dam. As Stott still believed that the dam would be valuable in his electorate, and with local community opinion mostly in its favour, he switched his support from Hall to Dunstan, resulting in the 1970 election which returned the ALP with a majority to govern in its own right.
Chowilla was one of the first instances of a campaign in which there was strong advocacy for environmental protection. The Sunraysia Salinity Committee opposed the dam as it believed that the combination of high evaporation and saline groundwater would lead to increased salinity downstream which would be harmful to horticulture. The future salinity concerns were raised in contrast to the local economic benefits to be brought by the construction project. The Victorian government was the first to change from support to opposition of the project.