Cost of poor quality
Cost of poor quality or poor quality costs, are costs that would disappear if systems, processes, and products were perfect.
COPQ was popularized by IBM quality expert H. James Harrington in his 1987 book Poor Quality Costs.
COPQ is a refinement of the concept of quality costs. In the 1960s, IBM undertook an effort to study its own quality costs and tailored the concept for its own use. While Feigenbaum's term "quality costs" is technically accurate, it's easy for the uninitiated to jump to the conclusion that better quality products cost more to produce. Harrington adopted the name "poor quality costs" to emphasize the belief that investment in detection and prevention of product failures is more than offset by the savings in reductions in product failures.
Harrington breaks down COPQ into the following elements:
Cost | Description |
Direct poor-quality costs
| Direct COPQ can be directly derived from entries in the company ledger. |
Indirect poor-quality costs | Indirect COPQ is difficult to measure because it is a delayed result of time, effort, and financial costs incurred by the customer. These customer costs add up to lost sales and therefore do not appear in the company's ledger. |
Examples
White collar COPQ
Harrington noted that expanding cost analyses to management and clerical workers could also make a significant dent in waste. He defined the following costs by functional area:Functional area | Controllable COPQ | Resultant COPQ |
Controller COPQ |
| |
Software COPQ | ||
Plant administration COPQ | ||
Purchasing COPQ | ||
Marketing COPQ | ||
Personnel COPQ | ||
Industrial engineering COPQ |
Cost of poor quality by inception point
The damages of poor quality augment as the inception point is further down the supply chain:TCFP =
Direct Cost
➔ failure at supplier's site
+ Labor Cost
+ Overhead Cost
+ Scrapping Cost
+ Rework
➔ failure at manufacturer's site
+ Repair / Recall Costs
+ Product Liability Costs
➔ failure at customers' site