The name consists of two elements; "Culve" and "stan", the second element being Old English for a stone. The meaning of the first element is much less certain, and may derive from a personal name, possibly Cuthwulf. The stone presumably referred to the original folkmoot place, for it was common for Anglo-Saxon communities to meet at a specific moot hill, tree or stone, and many Anglo-Saxon hundreds are then named after that specific place. However for Culvestan it is not known where this original meeting place was, other than within the bounds of the hundred. The manor of Culmington in the hundred has a similar name but it is not clear whether the two share a common toponymy, with Culmington's name possibly deriving instead from "the estate of Cuthhelm". The Domesday Book recorded two slightly different spelling variants of the hundred's name — twice as Colmestan and once as Comestane — which are more similar to Culmington. However this is believed to be the possible result of assimilation to the name of Culmington by the scribe.
Following the Norman conquest of England, many of the manors in the hundreds of Culvestan and Patton were owned by Roger de Montgomerie, 1st Earl of Shrewsbury, including the Culvestan manors of Corfham and Aston. Corfham was already by 1066 the caput for both Culvestan and Patton. It is believed that by the 12th century the caput for both hundreds was moved to Aston, northwest from Corfham Castle on the other side of the River Corve. Aston was near the tumulus known as Munslow and the place later became known as Aston Munslow.
Amalgamation into Munslow
The hundreds of Shropshire were greatly reformed throughout the 12th century, with the merger of Culvestan and Patton into Munslow being one of the earliest changes made. During the reign of Henry I the hundreds of Culvestan and Patton were formally merged and the new hundred formed was named Munslow. The new hundred included most of the manors of Culvestan and Patton, together with some from the hundred of Leintwardine which was being dissolved. Cleestanton, due to its connections with Wenlock Priory, would later form part of the franchise of Wenlock — see the section in the Patton article. The resulting hundred of Munslow resembled quite closely the hundred of Culvestan, as around half of the Patton element was removed. Culvestan continued to be a name used to describe the lower Corve valley for at least a century after the formal amalgamation of the hundred into Munslow.
Domesday Book manors
The following 28 manors were listed in the Domesday Book as belonging to the hundred of Culvestan. The modern place-names are given by way of extending in brackets the name of the manor. The two manors that did not become part of Munslow hundred are marked. ₩ Held by Wenlock Priory and became part of the Wenlock franchise. ṣ Became part of Stottesdon hundred. ♦ These three manors together formed a detached part of the hundred.
Boroughs and towns
At the time of the Domesday survey, there were no formal towns or boroughs in Culvestan, though Ludlow Castle had begun construction; Ludlow itself developed as a planned town during the 12th century, possibly in existence in the final years of Culvestan as a hundred. Church Stretton was granted a market charter about a century after the hundred's abolition, in 1214.
Religious establishments
, a college of secular canons founded before 1061, has a separate entry in the Domesday Book to the manor of Bromfield. Superior churches existed at Diddlebury in the manor of Corfham, Bromfield and Stanton.
Present-day
Culvestan is not a name in use in modern times. It is sometimes written as Culvestone in contemporary works. The entire area covered by the hundred in 1086 continues to be within Shropshire and in the hundred of Munslow, with Cleestanton returned to Munslow in an enlargement in 1836.
