Database testing usually consists of a layered process, including the user interface layer, the business layer, the data access layer and the database itself. The UI layer deals with the interface design of the database, while the business layer includes databases supporting business strategies.
Purposes
s, the collection of interconnected files on a server, storing information, may not deal with the same type of data, i.e. databases may be heterogeneous. As a result, many kinds of implementation and integration errors may occur in large database systems, which negatively affect the system's performance, reliability, consistency and security. Thus, it is important to test in order to obtain a database system which satisfies the ACID properties of a database management system. One of the most critical layers is the data access layer, which deals with databases directly during the communication process. Database testing mainly takes place at this layer and involves testing strategies such as quality control and quality assurance of the product databases. Testing at these different layers is frequently used to maintain consistency of database systems, most commonly seen in the following examples:
Data is critical from a business point of view. Companies such as Google or Symantec, who are associated with data storage, need to have a durable and consistent database system. If database operations such as insert, delete, and update are performed without testing the database for consistency first, the company risks a crash of the entire system.
Some companies have different types of databases, and also different goals and missions. In order to achieve a level of functionality to meet said goals, they need to test their database system.
The current approach of testing may not be sufficient in which developers formally test the databases. However, this approach is not sufficiently effective since database developers are likely to slow down the testing process due to communication gaps. A separate database testing team seems advisable.
Database testing mainly deals with finding errors in the databases so as to eliminate them. This will improve the quality of the database or web-based system.
Database testing should be distinguished from strategies to deal with other problems such as database crashes, broken insertions, deletions or updates. Here, database refactoring is an evolutionary technique that may apply.
Types of testings and processes
The figure indicates the areas of testing involved during different database testing methods, such as black-box testing and white-box testing.
Black-box
Black-box testing involves testing interfaces and the integration of the database, which includes:
With the help of these techniques, the functionality of the database can be tested thoroughly. Pros and Cons of black box testing include: Test case generation in black box testing is fairly simple. Their generation is completely independent of software development and can be done in an early stage of development. As a consequence, the programmer has better knowledge of how to design the database application and uses less time for debugging. Cost for development of black box test cases is lower than development of white box test cases. The major drawback of black box testing is that it is unknown how much of the program is being tested. Also, certain errors cannot be detected.
White-box
White-box testing mainly deals with the internal structure of the database. The specification details are hidden from the user.
It involves the testing of database triggers and logical views which are going to support database refactoring.
It performs module testing of database functions, triggers, views, SQL queries etc.
It validates database tables, data models, database schema etc.
The main advantage of white box testing in database testing is that coding errors are detected, so internal bugs in the database can be eliminated. The limitation of white box testing is that SQL statements are not covered.
The WHODATE approach
While generating test cases for database testing, the semantics of SQL statement need to be reflected in the test cases. For that purpose, a technique called WHite bOx Database Application Technique "" is used. As shown in the figure, SQL statements are independently converted into GPL statements, followed by traditional white box testing to generate test cases which include SQL semantics.
A set fixture describes the initial state of the database before entering the testing. After setting fixtures, database behavior is tested for defined test cases. Depending on the outcome, test cases are either modified or kept as is. The "tear down" stage either results in terminating testing or continuing with other test cases. For successful database testing the following workflow executed by each single test is commonly executed:
Clean up the database: If the testable data is already present in the database, the database needs to be emptied.
Set up Fixture: A tool like PHPUnit will then iterate over fixtures and do insertions into the database.
Run test, Verify outcome and then Tear down: After resetting the database to empty and listing the fixtures, the test is run and the output is verified. If the output is as expected, the tear down process follows, otherwise testing is repeated.
The setup for database testing is costly and complex to maintain because database systems are constantly changing with expected insert, delete and update operations.
Extra overhead is involved in order to determine the state of the database transactions.
After cleaning up the database, new test cases have to be designed.
An SQL generator is needed to transform SQL statements in order to include the SQL semantic into database test cases.
