Democracy voucher


A democracy voucher is a method of public financing of political campaigns used in municipal elections in Seattle, Washington.

Overview

The "democracy voucher" program was approved in a 2015 citywide referendum. Municipal elections in 2017 were the first year the program was implemented. It is the first program of its kind in the United States.
Under the program, each registered voter in Seattle received four $25 vouchers which they were eligible to give to any eligible candidates standing for election to municipal office. To be eligible, candidates must have
  1. already raised between $1,500 and $6,000 from a minimum number of donors;
  2. agreed to campaign finance restrictions, including accepting no more than $250 of non-voucher funds from any individual contributor, and
  3. agreed to cap campaign spending to a determined limit. In addition, participating candidates must not have received any contributions from a person or organization with more than $250,000 in service contracts with the city. People who are not eligible to vote, such as permanent residents, were also eligible.
The program was funded by a $3 million citywide increase in the real estate tax. The system was "first come, first served", with just 47,000 vouchers honored.
A similar plan was put forward by 2020 presidential candidate Andrew Yang. "Democracy Dollars" as the plan was called would give each registered voter $100 to put towards the political campaign of their choice annually.

Pro and con

Supporters said the program would increase the involvement of voters in election campaigns by increasing the percent of money given to political campaigns from less than 2 percent to between 10 and 15 percent, as well as limit the influence of special interests.
Opponents claimed that, because the vouchers would be distributed ten months before the general election and were assigned on a "first come, first served" basis, the program would largely benefit incumbent political candidates rather than challengers, because the latter typically launch their campaigns at a later date than incumbents. As a result, incumbents might receive all funds from the program, with available money completely depleted by the time challengers were able to organize campaigns.