The case of the construction of vector bundles from data on a disjoint union of topological spaces is a straightforward place to start. Suppose X is a topological spacecovered by open setsXi. Let Y be the disjoint union of the Xi, so that there is a natural mapping We think of Y as 'above' X, with the Xi projection 'down' onto X. With this language, descent implies a vector bundle on Y , and our concern is to 'glue' those bundles Vi, to make a single bundle V on X. What we mean is that V should, when restricted to Xi, give back Vi, up to a bundle isomorphism. The data needed is then this: on each overlap intersection of Xi and Xj, we'll require mappings to use to identify Vi and Vj there, fiber by fiber. Further the fij must satisfy conditions based on the reflexive, symmetric and transitive properties of an equivalence relation. For example, the composition for transitivity. The fii should be identity maps and hence symmetry becomes . These are indeed standard conditions in fiber bundle theory. One important application to note is change of fiber: if the fij are all you need to make a bundle, then there are many ways to make an associated bundle. That is, we can take essentially same fij, acting on various fibers. Another major point is the relation with the chain rule: the discussion of the way there of constructingtensor fields can be summed up as 'once you learn to descend the tangent bundle, for which transitivity is the Jacobianchain rule, the rest is just 'naturality of tensor constructions'. To move closer towards the abstract theory we need to interpret the disjoint union of the now as the fiber product of two copies of the projection p. The bundles on the Xij that we must control are V′ and V", the pullbacks to the fiber of V via the two different projection maps to X. Therefore, by going to a more abstract level one can eliminate the combinatorial side and get something that makes sense for p not of the special form of covering with which we began. This then allows a category theory approach: what remains to do is to re-express the gluing conditions.
Let. Each sheaf F on X gives rise to a descent data: where satisfies the cocycle condition: The fully faithful descent says: is fully faithful. The descent theory tells conditions for which there is a fully faithful descent.