Didymus Chalcenterus, was an Ancient Greek scholar and grammarian who flourished in the time of Cicero and Augustus.
Life
The epithet "Bronze-Guts" came from his indefatigable industry: he was said to have written so many books that he was unable to recollect what he had written in earlier ones, and so often contradicted himself. Athenaeus records that he wrote 3500 treatises, while Seneca gives the figure of 4000. As a result, he acquired the additional nickname, meaning "Book-Forgetting" or "Book-forgetter", a term coined by Demetrius of Troezen. He lived and taught in Alexandria and Rome, where he became the friend of Varro. He is chiefly important as having introduced Alexandrian learning to the Romans.
Works
He was a follower of the school of Aristarchus, and wrote a treatise on Aristarchus' edition of Homer entitled On Aristarchus' recension, fragments of which are preserved in the Venetus A manuscript of the Iliad. He also wrote monographs on many other Greek poets and prose authors. He is known to have written on Hesiod, the Greek lyric poets, notably Bacchylides and Pindar, and on drama; the better part of the Pindar and Sophocles scholia originated with Didymus. The Aristophanes scholia also cite him often, and he is known to have written treatises on Euripides, Ion, Phrynichus's Kronos, Cratinus, Menander, and many of the Greek orators including Demosthenes, Aeschines, Isaeus, Hypereides and Deinarchus. Besides these commentaries there are mentions of the following works, none of which survives:
On phraseology in tragedy, which comprised at least 28 books
Comic phraseology, of which Hesychius made much use
a third linguistic work on words of ambiguous or uncertain meaning, comprising at least seven books
a fourth linguistic work on false or corrupt expressions
a collection of Greek proverbs in thirteen books, from which most of the proverbs in Zenobius' collection are taken.
On the law-tablets of Solon, a work mentioned by Plutarch.
He is attributed with writing a critique of Cicero's De re publica, comprising six books, referred to by Ammianus Marcellinus, which provoked Suetonius to counter with a defense of that Roman writer. The authenticity of the attribution has been questioned on the grounds there is no evidence Didymus knew Latin, and the suggestion the source may have confused Didymus Chalcenterus with Claudius Didymus, who wrote a critique of Thucydides' style, and a work comparing Latin and Greek.
In addition there survive extracts on agriculture and botany, mention of a commentary on Hippocrates, and a completely surviving treatise On all types of marble and wood. In view of the drastic difference in subject matter it is possible that these represent the work of a different Didymos. The Stoic philosopher, Seneca, in his Epistulae Morales ad Lucilium claims that Didymus wrote four thousand books, while making a commentary on the acquisition of useless knowledge. Further insight into Didymus' methods of writing was provided by the discovery of a papyrus fragment of his commentary on the Philippics of Demosthenes. This confirms that he was not an original researcher, but a scrupulous compiler who made many quotations from earlier writers, and who was prepared to comment about chronology and history, as well as rhetoric and style.
