Directive-type Memorandum-19-004


Directive-type Memorandum-19-004 is a memorandum signed by David L. Norquist of the United States Department of Defense. The DTM bans most transgender individuals from serving or enlisting in the United States Armed Forces and applies to all organizational entities in the United States Department of Defense and the United States Coast Guard.
The memorandum bans new applicants who have any history of medical transition treatment. Applicants with a history of gender dysphoria are presumptively disqualified unless they have been deemed "stable" after 36 months and willing to detransition under their birth sex. The DTM took effect on April 12, 2019 and was scheduled to expire on March 12, 2020, but it has since been extended till September 12, 2020.

History

On October 3, 2016, Donald Trump called transgender individuals serving the United States military as "politically correct", but said he would leave such decisions to top military leaders. On May 16, 2017, a letter that was signed by dozens of right-leaning groups pushing for banning transgender individuals from the United States military. After the failure of passage of House Amendment 183, an amendment to prohibit the Pentagon funding gender reassignment surgeries sponsored by Vicky Hartzler, to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018, House Republicans went to Defense Secretary James Mattis to prohibit the Pentagon funding gender reassignment surgeries, who refused to immediately upend the policy. An extensive Defense Department review of the policy was already underway, but a decision wasn’t expected for months. So House Republicans went to the White House to prohibit the Pentagon funding gender reassignment surgeries. Chief strategist Steve Bannon encouraged Trump to deal with the matter now and played a role in pushing Trump to move ahead with banning transgender individuals from the military, despite the ongoing Pentagon review.
On July 26, 2017, President Trump tweeted he that would ban transgender personnel in the United States military. According to Politico, President Trump had always planned to ban transgender individuals from the military and prohibit the Pentagon funding gender reassignment surgeries. According to numerous congressional and White House sources, the tweet was a last-ditch attempt to save a House proposal that was a priority for Trump and was on the verge of defeat.

Provisions

Waivers are granted separately for gender dysphoria, to serve as one’s preferred gender, and to receive maintenance hormone therapy. There is ambiguity as to the consequences of a denial of the waiver.
On May 14, 2020, for the first time the United States Navy granted a wavier to an anonymous Naval officer, who was facing involuntary discharge serve, to serve in their preferred gender, to include obtaining a gender marker change in and being allowed to adhere to standards associated with their preferred gender, such as uniforms and grooming.

Comparison table

Enforcement

As of August 7, 2019, according to the Washington Blade, the United States Army, the United States Navy, the United States Air Force, the United States Marine Corps, and the United States Coast Guard have engaged in no discharges under Directive-type Memorandum-19-004. Also reported by the Washington Blade, the United States Army, the United States Navy, the United States Air Force, and the United States Marine Corps have engaged in no denial of enlistment to applicants under Directive-type Memorandum-19-004.

United States Coast Guard

As of August 7, 2019, according to the Washington Blade, the United States Coast Guard reported denying enlistment to two applicants under Directive-type Memorandum-19-004.

United States National Guard

The following state national guards are currently not enforcing the ban on transgender troops: California, Colorado, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington.

United States Navy

Service Members may live socially in their preferred gender while off-duty. There is no policy that prohibits the ability of a Service Member to express themselves off-duty in their preferred gender. Appropriate civilian attire, as outlined in the uniform regulations, will not be determined based on gender. Regional commanders and the senior officers present may suspend or restrict the privilege of wearing preferred gender civilian attire to meet local conditions and host-nation agreements with foreign countries.

United States Naval Academy

Starting in the fall of 2020, the United States Naval Academy will ban people who are transgender from attending the school.

Retention bills

CongressBill numbersDate introducedSponsors# of cosponsorsLatest status
116th CongressMay 2, 2019Adam Smith1House - 07/12/2019 The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 2500.
116th CongressMay 15, 2019Rosa L. DeLauro0Senate - 07/10/2019 Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 140.
116th CongressFebruary 7, 2019Jackie Speier23House - 02/08/2019 Referred to the Subcommittee on Military Personnel.
116th CongressFebruary 7, 2019Kirsten Gillibrand12Senate - 02/07/2019 Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.

Lawsuits

There are currently four lawsuits challenging Directive-type Memorandum-19-004:
The decision by the United States Supreme Court to stay preliminary injunctions in the cases Karnoski v. Trump and Stockman v. Trump suggests the justices are likely to uphold the ban if they ever rule on the issue.

H.Res. 124

On March 28, 2019, the United States House of Representatives passed, with 238 yeas, 185 nays, 1 present, and 8 not voting,, a non-binding resolution expressing opposition to banning service in the Armed Forces by openly transgender individuals.

Opinion polling

Reactions

said, "This administration's ban on transgender service members will go into effect this Friday April 12, 2019. They have targeted trans people from the moment they took power."
Kirsten Gillibrand blasted Trump for his discriminatory directive, saying, "A man who has never served has told men and women that their service is not worthy, based on their gender identity. I can't think of a more discriminatory, outrageous statement." Another Democratic politician, Steve Bullock, the governor of Montana, announced he would allow transgender Americans to serve in the military. Elizabeth Warren has pledged to overturn military transgender ban on the first day of her presidency.
The American Medical Association told the Associated Press in April 2019 that the memorandum mischaracterized transgender people as having a "deficiency."
On March 18, 2019, Democratic 2020 presidential candidate Cory Booker vowed to reverse Donald Trump’s ban on transgender individuals serving in the military if elected.
The military ban has widespread support among Republicans. The Republican National Committee has endorsed the trans ban from the military. Representative Ken Calvert of California has called for the exclusion of trans soldiers due to "deployability" problems. Calvert stated, "Individuals with medical conditions that do not allow them to deploy, such as those identified in the policy, adversely impact military readiness and reduce the military’s warfighting capability."
Some of Trump's own supporters have expressed their opposition to Directive-type Memorandum-19-004, including Christopher R. Barron. In addition, 56 retired generals and admirals signed on to a statement opposing the directive.
During his 2020 presidential campaign, Mike Bloomberg pledged to reverse the ban on transgender individuals in the military.