Linear time-invariant distributed parameter systems
Abstract evolution equations
Discrete-time
With U, X and YHilbert spaces and ' ∈ L, ' ∈ L, ' ∈ L and ' ∈ L the following difference equations determine a discrete-time linear time-invariant system: with ' a sequence with values in X, ' a sequence with values in U and a sequence with values in Y.
Continuous-time
The continuous-time case is similar to the discrete-time case but now one considers differential equations instead of difference equations: An added complication now however is that to include interesting physical examples such as partial differential equations and delay differential equations into this abstract framework, one is forced to consider unbounded operators. Usually A is assumed to generate a strongly continuous semigroup on the state space X. Assuming B, C and D to be bounded operators then already allows for the inclusion of many interesting physical examples, but the inclusion of many other interesting physical examples forces unboundedness of B and C as well.
The partial differential equation with and given by fits into the abstract evolution equation framework described above as follows. The input space U and the output space Y are both chosen to be the set of complex numbers. The state space X is chosen to be L2. The operator A is defined as It can be shown that A generates a strongly continuoussemigroup on X. The bounded operators B, C and D are defined as
The delay differential equation fits into the abstract evolution equation framework described above as follows. The input space U and the output space Y are both chosen to be the set of complex numbers. The state space X is chosen to be the product of the complex numbers with L2. The operator A is defined as It can be shown that A generates a strongly continuous semigroup on X. The bounded operators B, C and D are defined as
Transfer functions
As in the finite-dimensional case the transfer function is defined through the Laplace transform or Z-transform. Whereas in the finite-dimensional case the transfer function is a proper rational function, the infinite-dimensionality of the state space leads to irrational functions.
Discrete-time
In discrete-time the transfer function is given in terms of the state space parameters by and it is holomorphic in a disc centered at the origin. In case 1/z belongs to the resolvent set of A the transfer function equals. An interesting fact is that any function that is holomorphic in zero is the transfer function of some discrete-time system.
Continuous-time
If A generates a strongly continuous semigroup and B, C and D are bounded operators, then the transfer function is given in terms of the state space parameters by for s with real part larger than the exponential growth bound of the semigroup generated by A. In more general situations this formula as it stands may not even make sense, but an appropriate generalization of this formula still holds. To obtain an easy expression for the transfer function it is often better to take the Laplace transform in the given differential equation than to use the state space formulas as illustrated below on the examples given above.
Setting the initial conditionequal to zero and denoting Laplace transformswith respect tot by capital letters we obtain from the partial differential equation given above This is an inhomogeneous linear differential equation with as the variable, s as a parameter and initial condition zero. The solution is. Substituting this in the equation for Y and integrating gives so that the transfer function is.
Transfer function for the delay differential equation example
Proceeding similarly as for the partial differential equation example, the transfer function for the delay equation example is.
Controllability
In the infinite-dimensional case there are several non-equivalent definitions of controllability which for the finite-dimensional case collapse to the one usual notion of controllability. The three most important controllability concepts are:
Exact controllability,
Approximate controllability,
Null controllability.
Controllability in discrete-time
An important role is played by the maps which map the set of all U valued sequences into X and are given by. The interpretation is that is the state that is reached by applying the input sequence u when the initial condition is zero. The system is called
exactly controllable in time n if the range of equals X,
approximately controllable in time n if the range of is dense in X,
null controllable in time n if the range of includes the range of An.
Controllability in continuous-time
In controllability of continuous-time systems the map given by plays the role that plays in discrete-time. However, the space of control functions on which this operator acts now influences the definition. The usual choice is L2, the space of U-valued square integrable functions on the interval, but other choices such as L1 are possible. The different controllability notions can be defined once the domain of is chosen. The system is called
exactly controllable in time t if the range of equals X,
approximately controllable in time t if the range of is dense in X,
null controllable in time t if the range of includes the range of.
Observability
As in the finite-dimensional case, observability is the dual notion of controllability. In the infinite-dimensional case there are several different notions of observability which in the finite-dimensional case coincide. The three most important ones are:
Exact observability,
Approximate observability,
Final state observability.
Observability in discrete-time
An important role is played by the maps which map X into the space of all Y valued sequences and are given by if k ≤ n and zero ifk > n. The interpretation is that is the truncated output with initial condition x and control zero. The system is called
exactly observable in time n if there exists a kn > 0 such that for all x ∈ X,
approximately observable in time n if is injective,
final state observable in time n if there exists a kn > 0 such that for all x ∈ X.
Observability in continuous-time
In observability of continuous-time systems the map given by for s∈ and zero for s>t plays the role that plays in discrete-time. However, the space of functions to which this operator maps now influences the definition. The usual choice is L2, the space of Y-valued square integrable functions on the interval , but other choices such as L1 are possible. The different observability notions can be defined once the co-domain of is chosen. The system is called
exactly observable in time t if there exists a kt > 0 such that for all x ∈ X,
approximately observable in time t if is injective,
final state observable in time t if there exists a kt > 0 such that for all x ∈ X.
Duality between controllability and observability
As in the finite-dimensional case, controllability and observability are dual concepts. The correspondence under duality of the different concepts is: