Environmental product declaration
An Environmental Product Declaration is defined by International Organization for Standardization 14025 as a Type III declaration that "quantifies environmental information on the life cycle of a product to enable comparisons between products fulfilling the same function." The EPD methodology is based on the Life Cycle Assessment tool that follows ISO series 14040.
EPDs are primarily intended to facilitate business-to-business transactions, although they may also be of benefit to consumers who are environmentally focused when choosing goods or services. Companies implement EPDs in order to improve their sustainability goals, and to demonstrate a commitment to the environment to customers.
Content of EPDs
EPD reports are available from The International EPD System database. Specific content will vary according to the category of the product, but most summarize environmental information on the product in fewer than 50 pages. The text and illustrations are designed to be easily understood by consumers and retailers.As an example, a 38-page EPD for a pasta product contains sections on the brand and product, environmental performance calculations, information on sustainable wheat cultivation, milling, packaging production, pasta production, distribution, cooking, packaging end-of-life, and summary tables for environmental results in different markets.
Framework for creating an EPD
The first step in creating an EPD is defining the product, using the appropriate Product Category Rules. PCRs are specific rules and requirements verified by an independent, third-party panel. A Life Cycle Inventory for the LCA must be verified and from reliable sources. A Life Cycle Environmental Impact Analysis is performed by an LCA expert using software and a variety of assessment tools. The EPD is delivered as a document or report following a series of verification reviews; it is then ready for registration and publication.Product category rules
Environmental Product Declarations follow Life Cycle Assessment methodology. However, LCA studies can vary in terms of assumptions and information included. Consequently, the results for products that fulfill the same function may not be consistent with one another.Product Category Rules provide guidance that enables fair comparison among products of the same category. PCRs include the description of the product category, the goal of the LCA, functional units, system boundaries, cut-off criteria, allocation rules, impact categories, information on the use phase, units, calculation procedures, requirements for data quality, and other information. The goal of PCRs is to help develop EPDs for products that are comparable to others within a product category. ISO 14025 establishes the procedure for developing PCRs and the required content of a PCR, as well as requirements for comparability.
Duplication in PCRs for similar products in different countries arises from the different purposes of the PCRs, the varying standards they were based on, or the use of different product categorization systems. Different interpretations of PCR's can cause variances in data reporting within a product category.
However, EPDs that are effective require the use of standard factors in their formulation. Global harmonization of PCR and EPD standards remains a challenge.
Challenges in Creating EPDs
- Diverse range of PCR's: The presence and adaptation of non-uniform PCR's for the same product lead to fluctuating and varying EPD's, which leads to a fallacious comparison between the products. PCRs vary according to the geographical scope of the product, lack of specific standards of data and lack of coordination between program operators.
- Complex and inconsistent database: Due to the complex and time-consuming nature of data collection procedures, the Life Cycle Assessment requirement for an EPD becomes prolonged. Due to lack of precise site-specific data and the use of generic data over specific data can leads to inaccurate declarations. Report CEN 15941 states, "generic data should never replace specific data when specific data are available".
- Lack of satisfactory and acceptable third-party critical review: Inconsistency in sharing a common view on specific aspects and reviewing of only general aspects, leaving out more specific aspects, leads to varying interpretations of EPDs for similar products.
- Financial Constraints: Due to financial constraints in small scale companies and industries, publishing an EPD after performing an LCA becomes very cost-intensive.
- Incomplete formation and interpretation of results: Due to the unavailability of EPD's and PCR's for many products, it becomes very difficult to publish a complete and elaborate EPD for a product which involves the previous products in their life cycle. Lack of transparency in declaration procedure and uniform interpretation leads to an inconsistent comparison between products.
EPDs in Europe
In order to enhance harmonization, the main Programme Operators for EPD verification in the construction sector created the Association ECO Platform, with members from different European countries. The Programme Operators approved to issue EPD with the ECO Platform verified logo are:
- 2014:
- * Asociación Española de Normalización y Certificación - GlobalEPD Program
- * Bau EPD GmbH
- * EPD International AB - International EPD System
- * Institut Bauen und Umwelt e.V.
- 2015:
- * Building Research Establishment Limited
- * EPD Danmark
- * Instytut Techniki Budowlanej
- 2016:
- * Association HQE tio - FDES INIES
- * ICMQ S.p.a. - EPDItaly
- * DAPHabitat - DAPHabitat System
- Construction Products Europe
- Ceramie Unie ASBL
- Eurima AiSBL
EPDs in North America and Asia
Although the European-based EPD programs constitute a large portion of EPD programs all over the world, there are a number of North America and Asia EPD schemes:- North America
- * FP Innovations - EPD Program on Wood Products
- * NSF International
- * The Institute for Environmental Research & Education - Earthsure EPD
- * The Sustainability Consortium
- * UL Environment
- * ASTM International
- * Carbon Leadership Forum
- * ICC Evaluation Services
- * National Ready Mixed Concrete Association
- * SGS Global Services
- Asia
- *Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry
- *Korean Environmental Industry & Technology Institute
- *Environment and Development Foundation