Erwin Julius Ritter von Zach was an Austriandiplomat and sinologist noted for his studies of Chinese literature and its translation, as well as his often harsh criticism of other scholars' work. His German translation of the early Chinese anthologySelections of Refined Literature was the work's first complete translation in a Western language. He was the second consul of the Austro-Hungarian concession of Tianjin.
After publishing two articles on Manchu grammar, von Zach chose to pursue a career as a diplomat rather than as a scholar. He served in the Austro-Hungarian consulate in Beijing from 1901 to 1907, using his spare time to compile four volumes of his critiques of previous Chinese scholarship by Western scholars of his and previous generations, which he entitled Lexicographische Beiträge. In 1909, he submitted and defended the work as a doctoral dissertation at the University of Vienna, and was awarded a PhD. He served as a diplomatic leader in Hong Kong, Yokohama, and then Singapore. In 1919, following Austria-Hungary's dissolution after its defeat in World War I, von Zach's diplomatic post ceased to exist, leaving him with only a small pension. He then became a diplomat for the Dutch government in Indonesia - then part of the Netherlands East Indies - and served until 1925. In addition to authoring articles on topics of Chinese literature and translation, von Zach also spent years working on German translations of the Wen Xuan and the poems of Du Fu and Li Bai.
Death and legacy
In 1942, near the height of World War II, the 69-year-old von Zach and a large number of Germans were put onto a Dutch ship for transport to Sri Lanka. On the 19th of January, the ship was attacked and sunk by a Japanese torpedo bomber off the western coast of Sumatra. The Dutch crew escaped with all but one lifeboat, into which 53 of the 477 German passengers were loaded. The rest, including von Zach, drowned in the sea. Von Zach is remembered as a brilliant scholar who possessed "an astounding knowledge of Chinese", but whose legacy was deeply marred by his "irascible personality and a penchant for acerbic criticism of other Sinologists' work", which alienated him from his peers and prevented him from publishing his work in the major journals of Chinese and Asian scholarship. By the early 1930s, Paul Pelliot felt von Zach's rude and demeaning writings had become unbearable, and banned him from ever publishing articles in T'oung Pao. Von Zach's publications often consisted of what he called verbesserung articles, in which he would thoroughly identify and criticize errors in other scholars' work. He was often known to rail against the competing opinions of others without producing evidence for his position, simply stating that he was right and others were wrong. Although his arrogance and contentious nature alienated him from his colleagues throughout his life, von Zach's talent and insights ensured that much of his work was published and appreciated for its quality.