FLOW (programming language)


FLOW is an educational programming language designed by Jef Raskin in 1970 and implemented on several minicomputers in the early 1970s. The goal of the language is to make it easy to explore algorithms through a highly interactive environment. The overall language is very similar in syntax and structure to the BASIC programming language, but has a number of changes in order to make typing code easier. Most notable among these was the concept of "typing amplification", in which short strings, often a single character, were expanded by the language into the complete "unamplified" source code. Modern integrated development environments and code-oriented text editors often include a similar feature, now normally referred to as autocomplete.

History

In 1970, the English Department of the University of Kansas hosted a meeting on the use of computers in the humanities. The conference was followed by a training session that ran from June 13 to August 18, where Jef Raskin was one of several teachers involved in training other teachers basic computer skills. During this period, Raskin developed the FLOW language concept.
A key design element of FLOW was the attempt to avoid syntax errors by automating the entry of the language as much as possible. For instance, if one wanted to enter the statement, the user simply had to type and the interactive editor would expand it out as they typed. If the user entered an illegal command, it would flash on the terminal and then be automatically erased so the user was "none the worse for hitting a wrong key". They referred to this concept as "typing amplification", and noted that it had the added advantage of removing an impediment for slow typers or those with physical problems using a terminal.
Lewis and Norman later referred to this concept as "gag", in that it gagged the user's input until they typed something useful. They illustrated this by recounting one of Raskin's favorite demonstrations of FLOW, where he would close his eyes and hit random keys on the terminal, building a syntactically correct, albeit meaningless, program.
Another aspect of the FLOW system's approach to user interaction was its debugger. This included the command, an analog to BASIC's that delayed after executing each statement in a fashion similar to modern single-step systems.
On his return to University of California, San Diego, Raskin was able to arrange funding from UCSD and matching funds from the National Science Foundation to purchase equipment to develop the FLOW system, a total of $76,000. The initial system consisted of three Data General Nova minicomputers with 12k words of memory, several VST 1200 terminals, a Tektronix 4002 graphics terminal, and an HP 7200 plotter. In September 1973 the CPUs were updated to 32k words of memory.
The first version of FLOW was implemented by two graduate students at UCSD.
The original version was implemented in FORTRAN but later ported to Nova assembler language. Later ports included MICRO
800 assembler, BASIC and Algol.

Description

Overall organization

Like BASIC, FLOW uses line numbers both as an editing aid as well as statement labels. Unlike most BASICs, FLOW automatically numbers programs starting at line 10 and incrementing by 10 as new lines are entered. The line numbers are formatted as three digits, so line 10 is displayed as 010. Users can also enter line numbers manually, and renumber the entire program with the command.
In contrast to BASIC, the command can be instructed to stop once a given line was reached, for instance,. To enter this command, the user simply types, with the rest being "amplified" into the command line.

Syntax and capabilities

The most obvious difference between FLOW and BASIC was that FLOW lacks variables and mathematical operators. The language has only seven statements, all of which apply basic logic or string manipulation. There is no equivalent of the for loop either, looping is handled entirely through tests and statements.
The language does not have direct user interaction like BASIC's, data is instead defined in FLOW's analog of BASIC's statement,. defines a quote-delimited string, like, which is then read character-at-a-time using the. is a meta-variable that contains the last read character, and can then be used in other statements, like. becomes a blank -not an empty string but a single space- when the is completely read.
Programs can contain multiple statements, but unlike BASIC's where all of the lines are considered to be one continuous block of data, only one statement is active at a time as they are encountered by the interpreter. In other words, if there are two statements in a program, they are not treated as one longer statement as is the case with, will return a blank when it runs off the end of the active statement and will not return more data until the next statement is encountered in the code.

Statements

From:

Program statements

Interactive commands

Example

010 COMMENT FIND IF A WORD HAS EITHER AN "F" OR A "G" IN IT
020 COMMENT BY LYRA FORET 19 OCTOBER 1971
030 COMMENT
040 COMMENT SOME TEST CASES ARE FOX, GOPHER, RAT, DOG, CAT
050 COMMENT THE RESPECTIVE ANSWERS SHOULD BE YES, YES, NO, YES, NO.
060 COMMENT
070 TEXT IS "DOG"
080 COMMENT OBTAIN A LETTER OF THE TEXT
090 GET IT
100 COMMENT CHECK FOR A BLANK WHICH INDICATES END OF WORD
110 IF IT IS " " JUMP TO 500
120 COMMENT CHECK FOR F'S OR G'S
130 IF IT IS "F" JUMP TO 200
140 IF IT IS "G" JUMP TO 200
150 COMMENT IT WAS SOME OTHER LETTER, SO GO ON TO THE NEXT CHAR. IN THE TEXT
160 JUMP TO 080
200 PRINT "THE WORD HAD AN 'F' OR A 'G' IN IT."
210 COMMENT WE ARE DONE
220 STOP
500 PRINT "THE WORD DID NOT HAVE AN "F' OR A 'G' IN IT."

Citations