The flatrod system dates to the period before the invention of the steam engine and electricity. Using flatrods it was possible to operate man engines and pumping systems, even though the water wheel in question had a rotary, not a reciprocal, motion. So that the rods could be made to move in a reciprocal fashion, a change of direction had to be achieved by means of specially shaped components. The components of the system that were mounted in the mining shaft were called shaft rods or pump rods. Systems mounted in drift mines were called drift rods. The flatrods themselves were used to transfer power over greater distances between the main engine and the pump rods. Iron collars were fitted onto the wheel axles, connecting pipes and metal sleeves as well as certain parts of the wooden flatrods. The actual rods were long squared timbers that transmitted the power horizontally or at an incline. They had articulated iron joints that were designed such that they could be interleaved into one another and secured with bolts or screws.
Lifting rods
The lifting rod system ran vertically up the mineshaft, either to transfer power to the individual sets of shaft pumps or, in the case of man engines, to operate the man engine rods. In some cases the lifting rod system performed both duties. It consisted of roughly 19 to 20 centimetre thick squared spruce timbers. The poles were dovetailed at the ends and sides and were fixed to one another with correspondingly mortised wooden joints. These joints were tightly bound to the ends of the lifting rods with iron collars. In addition the iron collars were prevented from slipping by bolts inserted through them. At set distances there were also hooks on the sides that were used to hang the piston rods. So that the horizontal movement of the flat rods could be turned into a vertical movement, a rotating cross-shaped lever was fitted to the lifting rods. Connexion to the cross lever was achieved using a crank. To balance the load it was usual to have two lifting rods.
Flatrods
The purpose of the flatrods was to transfer the power of the motive engine over greater distances to the pump rods in the shaft. This was necessary if the motive engine could not be mounted above or immediately next to the mine shaft. A flatrod system had the disadvantage that there were additional efficiency losses due to the greater masses that had to be moved. The reciprocal motion in the joints of the interconnected flatrods lead to lifting losses of from 25 to 50 percent. In addition the construction of flatrods required additional timber. This was very maintenance-intensive due to the effects of weathering and it needed additional staff to inspect and maintain the flatrods. The flatrods consisted of several wooden rods, fitted with iron hinges. At the ends of the rods, on either side, were so-called Kunstschlösser. These were cut to fit in such a way that one rod could be mortised into another. This was necessary so that the flatrods could not slide apart as a result of to-and-fro or up-and-down motion. There were two types of flatrod: flatrods with rollers and flatrods with oscillating cranks. The former were laid on rollers. The rollers consisted of round timbers about eight to ten inches thick, that were firmly set into the ground on their underside and fixed in place with braces. In order to minimise friction, the rod was fitted with a drag rail in the area of the individual rollers that was made of beechwood and long enough to for the entire stroke length.
