The piece begins with images of a tormented woman, projected with a recording of voices asking "Hey, why are you so tormented?" With Nishio on stage, wearing a house covering her face and head, a dialectic is created between emotions and thinking, then a recording of Nishio's voice outlines an effort to stay in control while participating in daily life:
hile the telephone rings and the dog shuffles by someone knocks at the door. Why don't you just sit down and think, think, think, think.
A diagram of the artist's head is flashed with the wordthink repeated and pointing to various parts of the brain. There is a film of Nishio inside the house that she wears. She performs a monologue about the thinking process after which she takes off the house and throws across the stage. A meditation tape is played, and the artist lies down performing the soothing exercises instructed. The final instruction is
nside the brain, imagine a huge switchboard. Walk over to it and pull out all the plugs but one. Your only thought is your whole body, feeling quiet, comfortable, relaxed.
The piece also makes use of Nishio's shadow, and her assistant comes in throughout the performance to put up then take down cutouts of women. In the earlier Franklin Furnace performance, the house covered Nishio's midsection.
Critical reception
Of the 1983 performance at the Woman's Building, Terry Wolverton described it as:
a fast-paced multi-media tour of the activities of the brain, and of the person who tries to live inside the brain, disassociated from flesh, spirit, emotion... Nishio plugs her audience into the rhythms of the over-taxed, over-stimulated nervous system.
Wolverton complains about the size of the L.A. performance space lauding the work itself writing, "there's scarcely a superfluous movement, image, or word." She further writes of Nishio's performance, "It is rare to witness a performer undergo an internal process while performing, and this willingness to be vulnerable gives the work a great sense of depth and strength." Lippard in her book called the work "bitterly beautiful," its meanings "layered," its images "striking." The critic interpreted the performance's themes as racism, real estate, and dislocation, and the use of "'interior decoration' as a metaphor for cultural differences."