History of Federal Open Market Committee actions
This is a list of historical rate actions by the United States Federal Open Market Committee. The FOMC controls the supply of credit to banks and the sale of treasury securities. The Federal Open Market Committee meets every two months during the fiscal year. At scheduled meetings, the FOMC meets and makes any changes it sees as necessary, notably to the federal funds rate and the discount rate. The committee may also take actions with a less firm target, such as an increasing liquidity by the sale of a set amount of Treasury bonds, or affecting the price of currencies both foreign and domestic by selling dollar reserves. Jerome Powell is the current chairperson of the Federal Reserve and the FOMC.
Famous actions
Operation Twist (1961)
The Federal Open Market Committee action known as Operation Twist began in 1961. The intent was to flatten the yield curve in order to promote capital inflows and strengthen the dollar. The Fed utilized open market operations to shorten the maturity of public debt in the open market. It performs the 'twist' by selling some of the short term debt it purchased as part of the quantitative easing policy back into the market and using the money received from this to buy longer term government debt. Although this action was marginally successful in reducing the spread between long-term maturities and short-term maturities, Vincent Reinhart and others have suggested it did not continue for a sufficient period of time to be effective. Despite being considered a failure since a 1966 near-term analysis by Franco Modigliani and Richard Sutch, the action has subsequently been reexamined and in a 2011 paper economist Eric Swanson of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco has suggested that "Operation Twist" was more effective than originally thought. Swanson suggested similar action as an alternative to quantitative easing by central banks; the FOMC did in fact take an analogous action in 2011.Saturday Night Special (1979)
Soon after becoming chairman, Paul Volcker's federal reserve increased the Fed Funds rate from 11% to 12% during the weekend.Quantitative Easing 1 (QE1, December 2008 to March 2010)
"On November 25, 2008, the Federal Reserve announced that it would purchase up to $600 billion in agency mortgage-backed securities and agency debt. However, these purchases were to have no impact on the balance sheet, and would have been sterilized by Treasury sales by the SOMA desk. On December 1, Chairman Bernanke provided further details in a speech. On December 16 the program was formally approved by the FOMC, however their approval was not required as the SOMA desk was already authorized to acquire Agency debt and MBS as part of their OMOs. On March 18, 2009, the FOMC announced that the program would be expanded by an additional $750 billion in purchases of agency MBS and agency debt and $300 billion in purchases of Treasury securities. These purchases would be unsterilized and this date more appropriately marks the beginning of QE in the US.Zero Interest Rate Policy (ZIRP) (December 2008 to December 2015)
In August 2007, the Federal Open Market Committee's target for the federal funds rate was 5.25 percent. Sixteen months later, with the financial crisis in full swing, the FOMC had lowered the target for the federal funds rate to nearly zero, thereby entering the unfamiliar territory of having to conduct monetary policy with the policy interest rate at its effective lower bound. The unusual severity of the recession and ongoing strains in financial markets made the challenges facing monetary policymakers all the greater.In the height of the financial crisis in 2008, the Federal Open Market Committee decided to lower overnight interest rates to zero to help with easing of money and credit. Over the past five years, the Federal Reserve has acted to support economic growth and foster job creation, and it is important to achieve further progress, particularly in the labor market. Taking due account of the uncertainties and limits of its policy tools, the Federal Reserve will provide additional policy accommodation as needed to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability.
Quantitative Easing 2 (QE2, November 2010 to June 2011)
On November 3, 2010, the Fed announced that it would purchase $600 billion of longer dated treasuries, at a rate of $75 billion per month. That program, popularly known as "QE2", concluded in June 2011.Operation Twist (2011)
The Federal Open Market Committee concluded its September 21, 2011 Meeting at about 2:15 p.m. EDT by announcing the implementation of Operation Twist. This is a plan to purchase $400 billion of bonds with maturities of 6 to 30 years and to sell bonds with maturities less than 3 years, thereby extending the average maturity of the Fed's own portfolio. This is an attempt to do what Quantitative Easing tries to do, without printing more money and without expanding the Fed's balance sheet, therefore hopefully avoiding the inflationary pressure associated with QE. This announcement brought a bout of risk aversion in the equity markets and strengthened the US Dollar, whereas QE I had weakened the USD and supported the equity markets.Further, on June 20, 2012 the Federal Open Market Committee announced an extension to the Twist programme by adding additionally $267 billion thereby extending it throughout 2012.
Quantitative Easing 3 (QE3, September 2012 to December 2013)
On September 13, 2012, the Federal Reserve announced a third round of quantitative easing. This new round of quantitative easing provided for an open-ended commitment to purchase $40 billion agency mortgage-backed securities per month until the labor market improves "substantially". Some economists believe that Scott Sumner's blog on nominal income targeting played a role in popularizing the "wonky, once-eccentric policy" of "unlimited QE".The Federal Open Market Committee voted to expand its quantitative easing program further on December 12, 2012. This round continued to authorize up to $40 billion worth of agency mortgage-backed securities per month and added $45 billion worth of longer-term Treasury securities. The outright Treasury purchases as part of the augmented program continued at a pace comparable to that under "Operation Twist"; however, the Federal Reserve could no longer sell short-dated Treasury securities to buy longer-dated ones since they had insufficient holdings of short-dated Treasuries.
On December 18, 2013 the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee announced they would be tapering back on QE3 at a rate of $ 10 billion at each meeting. The Federal Reserve ended its monthly asset purchases program in October 2014, ten months after it began the tapering process.
December 2015 historic interest rate hike
On December 16, 2015 the Fed increased its key interest rate, the Federal Funds Rate, for the first time since June 2006. The hike was from the range to the range .March 2020 Coronavirus interest rate cut
In an emergency decision the rate was cut by half a percentage point on March 3, 2020 to 1–1.25% in response to the risk that the Coronavirus pandemic in the United States poses to the American economy. It was the first emergency cut since the financial crisis of 2007–08.Historical actions
Currently, this only shows meetings, both scheduled and unscheduled "emergency" meetings. The FOMC makes a number of other important pronouncements as well such as during testimony to Congress whose effects are harder to quantify.| Easing |
| Neutral |
| Tightening |
| Inter-meeting action |
| Date | Fed. Funds Rate | Discount Rate | Votes | Notes |
| March 15, 2020 | 0%–0.25% | 0.25% | 9–1 | This was an emergency unscheduled meeting in response to the Coronavirus pandemic in the United States. |
| March 3, 2020 | 1%–1.25% | 2.75% | 10–0 | This was an emergency unscheduled meeting in response to the Coronavirus pandemic in the United States. |
| October 30, 2019 | 1.50%–1.75% | 2.75% | 8–2 | |
| September 18, 2019 | 1.75%–2.00% | 2.75% | 7–3 | |
| July 31, 2019 | 2.00%–2.25% | 2.75% | 8–2 | President Donald Trump demanded a cut though a bigger one. |
| December 19, 2018 | 2.25%–2.50% | 3.00% | 10–0 | |
| September 26, 2018 | 2.00%–2.25% | 2.75% | 9–0 | |
| June 13, 2018 | 1.75%–2.00% | 2.50% | 8–0 | |
| March 21, 2018 | 1.50%–1.75% | 2.25% | 8–0 | |
| December 13, 2017 | 1.25%–1.50% | 2.00% | 7–2 | Kashkari and Evans both dissented due to flattening yield curve concerns. |
| June 14, 2017 | 1.00%–1.25% | 1.75% | 8–1 | |
| March 15, 2017 | 0.75%–1.00% | 1.50% | 9–1 | |
| December 14, 2016 | 0.50%–0.75% | 1.25% | 10–0 | |
| December 16, 2015 | 0.25%–0.50% | 1.00% | 10–0 | |
| June 22, 2011 | 0.00%–0.25% | 0.75% | 10–0 | |
| December 16, 2008 | 0.00%–0.25% | 0.50% | 10–0 | See also: ZIRP |
| October 29, 2008 | 1.00% | 1.25% | 10–0 | |
| October 8, 2008 | 1.50% | 1.75% | This was an emergency unscheduled meeting in response to a rapidly weakening economy, made in coordination with several other central banks around the world. | |
| April 30, 2008 | 2.00% | 2.25% | 8–2 | The FOMC cut rates by 25 basis points. They drew back on their easing bias somewhat by removing "downside risks to growth remain" from its statement, but left no sign of a future pause to the interest rate cuts. Fisher and Plosser dissented, preferring no change. |
| March 18, 2008 | 2.25% | 2.50% | 8–2 | The FOMC made another unusually large cut, slashing 75 basis points off the federal funds rate in response to turmoil in the markets and the collapse of Bear Stearns. Despite some predicting an even larger 100 basis point cut, the markets rallied in response. Fisher and Plosser dissented, preferring a smaller cut. |
| March 16, 2008 | 3.00% | 3.25% | 10–0 | This was an emergency unscheduled meeting in response to the meltdown at Bear Stearns. The FOMC arranged loan securities for JPMorgan Chase and greased a buyout of Bear Stearns to make certain that Bear's debts would be backed. It also provided for the creation of a fund to swap safe Treasury securities for less secure ones held by banks. It lastly shaved the difference between the discount rate and the federal funds rate from 50 basis points to 25. |
| January 30, 2008 | 3.00% | 3.50% | 9–1 | Fisher dissented, preferring no change. |
| January 22, 2008 | 3.50% | 4.00% | 8–1 | This was an intermeeting rate cut held in response to the January stock downturn, with the results announced Tuesday morning before the U.S. market opened. Poole dissented, saying that emergency action was not required and could wait for the scheduled meeting. Mishkin was absent. |
| December 11, 2007 | 4.25% | 4.75% | 9–1 | Rosengren dissented, preferring a 50 basis point cut. The markets, disappointed with a 25 basis point cut, fell in response; the Fed issued a statement the day after pledging an increased money supply to the markets in conjunction with other central banks. , |
| October 31, 2007 | 4.50% | 5.00% | 9–1 | Hoenig dissented, preferring no change. |
| September 18, 2007 | 4.75% | 5.25% | 10–0 | |
| August 17, 2007 | 5.25% | 5.75% | 10–0 | The subprime mortgage crisis roiled the markets shortly after the Fed's August 7 meeting, causing the board to release a statement on August 10 saying that they were prepared to act in response to the downturn and had increased liquidity. In an unscheduled meeting on August 17 the Fed "temporarily" reduced the spread between the primary credit rate and the federal funds rate to 50 basis points from the 100-point spread established in January 2002. , , . |
| August 7, 2007 | 5.25% | 6.25% | 10–0 | |
| June 28, 2007 | 5.25% | 6.25% | 10–0 | |
| May 9, 2007 | 5.25% | 6.25% | 10–0 | |
| March 21, 2007 | 5.25% | 6.25% | 10–0 | Bies recused herself. |
| January 31, 2007 | 5.25% | 6.25% | 11–0 | |
| December 12, 2006 | 5.25% | 6.25% | 10–1 | Lacker dissented, preferring a 25 basis point increase. |
| October 25, 2006 | 5.25% | 6.25% | 10–1 | Lacker dissented, preferring a 25 basis point increase. |
| September 20, 2006 | 5.25% | 6.25% | 10–1 | Lacker dissented, preferring a 25 basis point increase. First vote from Frederic Mishkin after his appointment. |
| August 8, 2006 | 5.25% | 6.25% | 9–1 | The Fed kept rates stable this meeting; they had raised the rates by 25 basis points for seventeen consecutive meetings prior. Lacker dissented, preferring a 25 basis point increase. |
| June 29, 2006 | 5.25% | 6.25% | 10–0 | Mark W. Olson not voting, as his appointment and departure for the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in July has already been announced. |
| May 10, 2006 | 5.00% | 6.00% | 11–0 | |
| March 28, 2006 | 4.75% | 5.75% | 11–0 | This was Ben Bernanke's first meeting as new Chairman, replacing Alan Greenspan. He continued Greenspan's policy of gradual tightening and pledged increased transparency for the Federal Reserve. |
| January 31, 2006 | 4.50% | 5.50% | 10–0 | |
| December 13, 2005 | 4.25% | 5.25% | 10–0 | |
| 4.00% | 5.00% | 10–0 | ||
| 3.75% | 4.75% | 9–1 | Olson dissented, preferring no change. | |
| August 9, 2005 | 3.50% | 4.50% | 10–0 | Edward Gramlich not voting, as his return to the University of Michigan in September has already been announced. |
| June 30, 2005 | 3.25% | 4.25% | 11–0 | |
| May 3, 2005 | 3.00% | 4.00% | 11–0 | Ben Bernanke not voting, as his appointment and departure for the Council of Economic Advisers to the White House in June has already been announced. |
| March 22, 2005 | 2.75% | 3.75% | 12–0 | |
| February 2, 2005 | 2.50% | 3.50% | 12–0 | |
| December 14, 2004 | 2.25% | 3.25% | 12–0 | The FOMC changed their previous policy on the release of the minutes from each meeting. Previously, the minutes were released only after the next meeting had already finished, rendering them only of historical interest; this was changed to be released three weeks after the date of a policy decision. The minutes thus became available for predicting the FOMC's action in the next meeting. |
| November 10, 2004 | 2.00% | 3.00% | 12–0 | |
| September 21, 2004 | 1.75% | 2.75% | 12–0 | |
| August 10, 2004 | 1.50% | 2.50% | 12–0 | |
| June 30, 2004 | 1.25% | 2.25% | 12–0 | |
| May 4, 2004 | 1.00% | 2.00% | 12–0 | |
| March 16, 2004 | 1.00% | 2.00% | 12–0 | |
| January 28, 2004 | 1.00% | 2.00% | 12–0 | |
| December 9, 2003 | 1.00% | 2.00% | 12–0 | |
| October 28, 2003 | 1.00% | 2.00% | 12–0 | |
| September 16, 2003 | 1.00% | 2.00% | 12–0 | |
| August 12, 2003 | 1.00% | 2.00% | 12–0 | |
| June 25, 2003 | 1.00% | 2.00% | 11–1 | Parry dissented, preferring a 50 basis point cut. |
| May 6, 2003 | 1.25% | 2.25% | 12–0 | |
| March 18, 2003 | 1.25% | 2.25% | 12–0 | |
| January 29, 2003 | 1.25% | 2.25% | 12–0 | |
| January 9, 2003 | 1.25% | 2.25% | No meeting, but new discount window rules introduced in October were implemented. These mandated a discount rate 100 basis points higher than the federal funds rate, effectively hiking it by 150 basis points. | |
| December 10, 2002 | 1.25% | 0.75% | 12–0 |