List of NBA G League yearly standings
These are regular season standings and playoff results for the NBA G League. The NBA G League is the official minor league basketball organization owned and run by the National Basketball Association. The league was formed in 2001 as the National Basketball Development League. The league was renamed to NBA Development League in 2005 to reflect its close affiliation with the NBA. In 2017, it was renamed NBA G League, as part of a sponsorship deal with Gatorade.
2001–02
Team | W | L | Win % | GB |
North Charleston Lowgators | 36 | 20 | .643 | — |
Greenville Groove | 36 | 20 | .643 | — |
Columbus Riverdragons | 31 | 25 | .554 | 5 |
Mobile Revelers | 30 | 26 | .536 | 6 |
Huntsville Flight | 26 | 30 | .464 | 10 |
Asheville Altitude | 26 | 30 | .464 | 10 |
Fayetteville Patriots | 21 | 35 | .375 | 15 |
Roanoke Dazzle | 18 | 38 | .321 | 18 |
2002–03
Team | W | L | Win % | GB |
Fayetteville Patriots | 32 | 18 | .640 | — |
North Charleston Lowgators | 26 | 24 | .520 | 6 |
Mobile Revelers | 26 | 24 | .520 | 6 |
Roanoke Dazzle | 26 | 24 | .520 | 6 |
Asheville Altitude | 23 | 27 | .460 | 9 |
Columbus Riverdragons | 23 | 27 | .460 | 9 |
Greenville Groove | 22 | 28 | .440 | 10 |
Huntsville Flight | 22 | 28 | .440 | 10 |
2003–04
Team | W | L | Win % | GB |
Asheville Altitude | 28 | 18 | .609 | — |
Charleston Lowgators | 27 | 19 | .587 | 1 |
Huntsville Flight | 24 | 22 | .522 | 4 |
Fayetteville Patriots | 21 | 25 | .457 | 7 |
Roanoke Dazzle | 20 | 26 | .435 | 8 |
Columbus Riverdragons | 18 | 28 | .391 | 10 |
2004–05
Team | W | L | Win % | GB |
Columbus Riverdragons | 30 | 18 | .625 | — |
Asheville Altitude | 27 | 21 | .563 | 3 |
Huntsville Flight | 27 | 21 | .563 | 3 |
Roanoke Dazzle | 26 | 22 | .542 | 4 |
Fayetteville Patriots | 17 | 31 | .354 | 13 |
Florida Flame | 17 | 31 | .354 | 13 |
2005–06
Team | W | L | Win % | GB |
Fort Worth Flyers | 28 | 20 | .583 | — |
Albuquerque Thunderbirds | 26 | 22 | .542 | 2 |
Florida Flame | 25 | 23 | .521 | 3 |
Roanoke Dazzle | 25 | 23 | .521 | 3 |
Arkansas RimRockers | 24 | 24 | .500 | 4 |
Austin Toros | 24 | 24 | .500 | 4 |
Tulsa 66ers | 24 | 24 | .500 | 4 |
Fayetteville Patriots | 16 | 32 | .333 | 12 |
2006–07
Regular season
Eastern Division
Western Division
Notes- x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
- Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.
Playoffs
Notes
- The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
- An asterisk denotes overtime period.
- Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
- Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2007–08
Regular season
Central Division
Southwest Division
Western Division
Notes
- x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
- Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.
Playoffs
Notes
- The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
- The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
- The division winners are marked by an asterisk.
- Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
- Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2008–09
Regular season
Complete rosters for each of the 16 2008–09 NBA D-League teams will consist of the ten players drafted November 7 along with seven returning, allocation, and local tryout players. Rosters will be reduced to 12 players on November 20 and opening-day 10-man rosters must be set by November 26 in anticipation of the November 28 tip off of the NBA D-League's eighth season. Each team will play one preseason game between November 19 and 25.Central Division
Southwest Division
Western Division
Notes
- x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
- Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.
Playoffs
Notes
- The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
- The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
- The division winners are marked by an asterisk.
- Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
- Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2009–10
Regular season
Eastern Conference
Western Conference
Notes- x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
- Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.
Playoffs
Notes
- The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
- The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
- The conference champions are marked by an asterisk.
- Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
- Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2010–11
Regular season
Eastern Conference
Western Conference
Notes- x indicates a team that had qualified for the playoffs
- Number in parentheses indicates the team's seeding for the playoffs.
Playoffs
Notes
- The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
- The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
- The conference champions are marked by an asterisk.
- Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
- Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2011–12
Regular season
Eastern Conference
Western Conference
Notes- x indicates teams that have qualified for the playoff
Playoffs
Notes
- The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
- The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
- The conference champions are marked by an asterisk.
- Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
- Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2012–13
Regular season
Eastern Conference
Central Conference
Western Conference
Notes- x indicates teams that have qualified for the playoff
- Maine qualified over Erie due to a better head-to-head record.
Playoffs
Notes
- The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
- The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
- The conference champions are marked by an asterisk.
- Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
- Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Finals
2013–14
Regular season
East Division
Central Division
- In addition to finishing tied with each other, Iowa and Sioux Falls also finished tied with Los Angeles. The tie among the three teams was broken with a multiple-team tiebreaker by comparing the teams' records in games against one another. Los Angeles was 3–2, Iowa was 4–3, and Sioux Falls was 4–6. This gave Los Angeles the #2 seed, Iowa the #3 seed and the Central Division championship and left Sioux Falls with the #4 seed.
- Texas and Tulsa split their regular-season series, 3–3. Texas was 8–11 against opponents with records of.500 or better compared with Tulsa's record of 12–17 in such games.
West Division
- Idaho won the season series against Bakersfield, 3–2.
- x indicates teams that have qualified for the playoffs with seeding in.
- If Los Angeles had not been involved in a three-way tie with Iowa and Sioux Falls, Iowa still would have won the Central Division championship. Iowa and Sioux Falls split their regular-season series, 3-3. Iowa was 13-14 against opponents with records of.500 or better compared with Sioux Falls's record of 12-13 in such games. If Sioux Falls had not been involved in a three-way tie with Iowa and Los Angeles, or if the league broke ties within divisions before interdivisional ties, Iowa would have been the #2 seed based on head-to-head record against Los Angeles, since Iowa won the only game the teams played.
- If the league broke ties for non-playoff teams in the same way as it does to determine playoff seeding, the tie among Texas, Tulsa, Idaho and Bakersfield would have been broken using a multiple-team tiebreaker by considering the teams' records in games they played against one another. Tulsa was 5-4, Bakersfield was 6-5, Idaho was 5-5 and Texas was 6-8 in such games. This would have given Tulsa fourth place in the Central Division, Bakersfield fourth place in the West Division, Idaho last place in the West Division and Texas fifth place in the Central Division.
Playoffs
Notes
- The numbers to the left of each team indicate the team's seeding.
- The numbers to the right indicate the number of games the team won in that round.
- The division champions are marked by an asterisk.
- Teams in bold advanced to the next round.
- Teams in italics have home-court advantage in that round.
Quarterfinals
Semifinals
Finals
2014–15
Regular season
;Eastern ConferenceTeam | ||||||
x- Maine Red Claws | 35 | 15 | – | 20–6 | 15-9 | |
x- Canton Charge | 31 | 19 | 4 | 14–10 | 17–9 | |
Erie BayHawks | 24 | 26 | 11 | 15–10 | 9–16 | |
Delaware 87ers | 20 | 30 | 15 | 11–14 | 9–16 | |
Westchester Knicks | 10 | 40 | 25 | 9–16 | 1–24 |
Team | ||||||
x- Sioux Falls Skyforce | 29 | 21 | – | 14–10 | 15–11 | |
x- Fort Wayne Mad Ants | 28 | 22 | 1 | 14–11 | 14–11 | |
Iowa Energy | 26 | 24 | 3 | 13–12 | 13–12 | |
Grand Rapids Drive | 23 | 27 | 6 | 15–9 | 8–18 |
;Western Conference
Team | ||||||
x- Austin Spurs | 32 | 18 | – | 18–8 | 14–10 | |
x- Oklahoma City Blue | 28 | 22 | 4 | 16–9 | 12–13 | |
Rio Grande Valley Vipers | 27 | 23 | 5 | 14–11 | 13–12 | |
Texas Legends | 22 | 28 | 10 | 8-17 | 14–11 |
2015–16
Regular season
;Eastern ConferenceTeam | ||||||
y-Maine Red Claws | 31 | 19 | – | 15–10 | 16–9 | |
x-Westchester Knicks | 28 | 22 | 3 | 13-12 | 15–10 | |
Raptors 905 | 23 | 27 | 8 | 10-15 | 13-12 | |
Delaware 87ers | 21 | 29 | 10 | 13-11 | 8-18 | |
Erie BayHawks | 12 | 38 | 19 | 9-16 | 3-22 |
Team | ||||||
z-Sioux Falls Skyforce | 40 | 10 | – | 22–3 | 18–7 | |
x-Canton Charge | 31 | 19 | 9 | 18-7 | 13-12 | |
Iowa Energy | 26 | 24 | 14 | 15-11 | 12-13 | |
Grand Rapids Drive | 21 | 29 | 19 | 14-11 | 7-18 | |
Fort Wayne Mad Ants | 20 | 30 | 20 | 13-12 | 7-18 |
;Western Conference
Team | ||||||
z-Reno Bighorns | 33 | 17 | – | 20-5 | 13–12 | |
x-Los Angeles D-Fenders | 27 | 23 | 6 | 17–8 | 10–15 | |
Bakersfield Jam | 22 | 28 | 11 | 13–12 | 9-16 | |
Idaho Stampede | 20 | 30 | 13 | 13–12 | 7–18 | |
Santa Cruz Warriors | 19 | 31 | 14 | 12–13 | 7–18 |