In ecology, matutinal crepuscular animals are those that are significantly active during pre-dawn or early morning hours. During the morning’s twilight period and shortly thereafter, these animals partake in important tasks, such as scanning for mates, mating, and foraging. Matutinal behaviour is thought to be adaptive because there may be less competition between species, and sometimes even a higher prevalence of food during these hours. It may also serve as an anti-predatory adaptation by allowing animals to sit between the brink of danger that may come with nocturnal and diurnal activity.
Etymology
The etymology of the term matutinal is the Latinwordmātūtīnus, + -ālis,.
Adaptive Relevance
, such as high predatory activity or low food may require animals to change their behaviours to adapt. An animal changing the time of day at which it carries out significant tasks is recognized as one of these adaptive behaviours. For example, human activity, which is more predominant during daylight hours, has forced certain species living in urban areas to shift their schedules to crepuscular ones. When observed in environments where there is little or no human activity, these same species often do not exhibit this temporal shift. It may be argued that if the goal is to avoid human activity, or any other diurnal predator's activity, a nocturnal schedule would be safer. However, many of these animals depend on sight, so a matutinal or crepuscular schedule is especially advantageous as it allows animals to both avoid predation, and have sufficient light to mate and forage.
Matutinal Mating
For certain species, commencing mating during the early morning's twilight period may be adaptive because it could reduce the risk of predation, increase the chance of finding mates, and reduce competition for mates, all of which may increase reproductive success.
Anti-Predatory Adaptation
Animals are generally more vulnerable during copulation, so mating during a time when there is less predatory activity may be an anti-predatory adaptation. Some species may even take up to several hours to finish mating, which increases this vulnerability. For species that copulate for longer periods, shifting their mating schedule may additionally allow enough time for the male to completely inseminate the female. One example of a matutinal mating routine is exhibited by female tropical praying mantises.'' To avoid detection from predators they use different stances to blend in with their environment. They can orient themselves to look like leaves or sticks. However, when females are ready to mate they will take up a different posture where they expose pheromone-emitting glands that attract mates, and in the process must disengage from their normal camouflaging stance. Likely to compensate for this vulnerability, females will initiate this stance only at first light when diurnal predators that are visual hunters are less active.
Reduced Competition
Some animals engage in matutinal searching flights to find mates early in the morning. It is thought that this is adaptive because it increases the chance of finding mates, and reduces competition for mates. This is supported by the mating behaviour of certain socially monogamous birds. For example, female superb fairywrens '', are a monogamous bird that perform extra-pair copulations during matutinal hours. One explanation for the prevalence of extra-pair copulation is that it enhances the gene pool of the species' offspring. This activity is most often seen matutinally because they: can avoid being followed by their monogamous partner in the dimly-lit early morning, males are more likely to be present in their territory during these hours, and males are more likely to have a higher quantity of sperm in the early morning. These points may apply to how matutinal mating is adaptive in other species. Similar behaviours have been observed in other species, such as in males of two species of dragonflies. They engage in matutinal searching flights each morning until they find a receptive female to mate with. A similar phenomenon is seen in male praying mantises, where they respond to the emerging light each morning by increasing flight activity.
Matutinal Foraging
Some animals exhibit increased foraging behaviour during the matutinal hours. Some examples of why this may be adaptive are: it may increase predatory success and competition for food may be reduced.
Predatory Adaptation
The blue shark '' is a predator that primarily hunts during the pre-dawn to dawn period. During matutinal hours, they spend more time than any other point in the day at the surface of the ocean. It is likely that they are taking advantage of the increased density of prey at the water's surface during dawn. It is also possible that, since only a thin layer at the surface of the ocean is dimly lit during this twilight period, the shark has vision of the prey, but the prey do not have vision of the shark, allowing the shark to sneak up on the prey, increasing predatory success.
Reduced Competition
Some bees forage matutinally, possibly because there is less competition for food during this period. The Hemihalictus lustrans, for example, is a bee that works mutualistically with the dandellion Pyrrhopappus carolinianus during matutinal hours.Pyrrhopappus carolinianus flowers very early in the morning and Hemihalictus lustrans begins foraging at the same time. The bee tears open the dandellion's anthers just as it is flowering, which speeds up anthesis and ensures that it almost always has first claim to the dandellion's pollen.
Physiological Evidence of Adaptation
These matutinal behaviours may be induced by physiological adaptations. Robinson & Robinson reversed the day-night schedule of female tropical praying mantises. After they adjusted to the schedule, the praying mantises were removed from their chambers at different times throughout the newly adjusted night period and placed in the light. Each praying mantis initiated their pheromone-emitting stance during this transition regardless of the time, which suggests that this behaviour depends solely on the transition from dark to light. The authors suggested that this was likely a physiological adaptation.
