NATO EPVAT testing
NATO EPVAT testing is one of the three recognized classes of procedures used in the world to control the safety and quality of firearms ammunition.
Beside this, there are also the Commission Internationale Permanente pour l'Epreuve des Armes à Feu Portatives class of procedures and the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute class of procedures.
EPVAT Testing is described in unclassified documents by NATO, more precisely by the AC/225 Army Armaments Group.
EPVAT is an abbreviation for "Electronic Pressure Velocity and Action Time". Action Time here means the time required between the ignition of the primer and the projectile leaving the barrel. This is a comprehensive procedure for testing ammunition using state-of-the-art instruments and computers. The procedure itself is described in NATO document AC/225 D/200.
Unlike the C.I.P. procedures aiming only at the user's safety, the NATO procedures for ammunition testing also includes comprehensive functional quality testing in relation with the intended use. That is, not only the soldier's safety is looked at, but also his capacity to incapacitate the enemy. As a result, for every ammunition order by NATO, a complete acceptance approval on both safety and functionality is performed by both NATO and the relevant ammunition manufacturers in a contradictory fashion.
For this, a highly accurate and indisputable protocol has been defined by NATO experts using a system of reference cartridges.
The civilian organisations C.I.P. and SAAMI use less comprehensive test procedures than NATO, but NATO test centres have the advantage that only a few chamberings are in military use. The C.I.P. and SAAMI proof houses must be capable of testing hundreds of different chamberings requiring many different test barrels, etc..
Proofing
The minimum proof and performance requirements for small arms ammunition of NATO calibres are covered in STANAGs as follows:- 5.56 mm. STANAG 4172 and NATO Manual of Proof and Inspection AC/225 D/8.
- 7.62 mm. STANAG 2310 and NATO Manual of Proof and Inspection AC/225 D/9.
- 9 mm. STANAG 4090 and NATO Manual of Proof and Inspection AC/225 D/170.
- 12.7 mm. STANAG 4383 and NATO Manual of Proof and Inspection AC/225 D/11.
Each weapon will be individually tested, from an ammunition lot that produces a minimum corrected mean chamber pressure in accordance with the table below:
Calibre | Specific Weapon Detail | Service Pressure Pmax MPa / | Proof Round Pressure Requirement MPa / | Detailed Requirement for Proof Ammunition |
5.56 mm | Designed to chamber NATO ammunition | 430.0 / | 537.5 / | Pressure recorded in NATO design EPVAT Barrel with Kistler 6215 Transducer, HPI GP6 Transducer or by equipment to Commission Internationale Permanente pour l’épreuve des Armes á Feu Portatives requirements |
7.62 mm | Designed to chamber NATO ammunition | 415.0 / | 519.0 / | Pressure recorded in NATO design EPVAT Barrel with Kistler 6215 Transducer, HPI GP6 Transducer or by equipment to C.I.P. requirements |
9 mm | Designed to chamber NATO ammunition | 252.0 / | 315.0 / | Pressure recorded in C.I.P. design barrel at mid-case position |
12.7 mm | Designed to chamber NATO ammunition | 417.0 / | 521.3 / | Pressure recorded in NATO design EPVAT Barrel with Kistler 6215 Transducer, HPI GP6 Transducer or by equipment to C.I.P. requirements |
All other small arms ammunition for use in "non-NATO Chamber" weapons | As defined by the current C.I.P. legislation. | As defined by the current C.I.P. legislation |
The above proof round pressure requirements for the 9 mm and 12.7 mm rounds established by the British Ministry of Defence are higher than the current C.I.P. proof round pressure requirement legislation for the civilian equivalent 9mm Parabellum and.50 Browning rounds. The 9×19mm NATO and 12.7×99mm NATO rounds can be regarded as overpressure ammunition
Unlike the civilian C.I.P. test procedures NATO EPVAT testing procedures for the "NATO chamberings" require the pressure sensor or transducer to be mounted ahead of the case mouth. The advantage of this mounting position is that there is no need to drill the cartridge case to mount the transducer. Drilling prior to firing is always a time consuming process. The disadvantage of this mount is that the pressure rises much faster than in a drilled cartridge case. This causes high frequency oscillations of the pressure sensor and this requires electronic filtering with the drawback that filtering also affects the lower harmonics where a peak is found causing a slight error in the measurement. This slight error is not always well mastered and this causes a lot of discussion about the filter order, cutoff frequency and its type.
Due to NATO EPVAT using technically differing proof test standards than SAAMI and C.I.P., EVPAT pressures cannot be directly compared with SAAMI and C.I.P. pressures.