NEXRAD
NEXRAD or Nexrad is a network of 159 high-resolution S-band Doppler weather radars operated by the National Weather Service, an agency of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the United States Department of Commerce, the Federal Aviation Administration within the Department of Transportation, and the U.S. Air Force within the Department of Defense. Its technical name is WSR-88D.
NEXRAD detects precipitation and atmospheric movement or wind. It returns data which when processed can be displayed in a mosaic map which shows patterns of precipitation and its movement. The radar system operates in two basic modes, selectable by the operator – a slow-scanning clear-air mode for analyzing air movements when there is little or no activity in the area, and a precipitation mode, with a faster scan for tracking active weather. NEXRAD has an increased emphasis on automation, including the use of algorithms and automated volume scans.
Deployment
In the 1970s, the U.S. Departments of Commerce, Defense, and Transportation, agreed that to better serve their operational needs, the existing national radar network needed to be replaced. The radar network consisted of WSR-57 developed in 1957, and WSR-74 developed in 1974. Neither system employed Doppler technology, which provides wind speed and direction information.The Joint Doppler Operational Project was formed in 1976 at the National Severe Storms Laboratory to study the usefulness of using Doppler radar to identify severe and tornadic thunderstorms. Tests over the next three years, conducted by the National Weather Service and the Air Weather Service agency of the U.S. Air Force, found that Doppler radar provided much improved early detection of severe thunderstorms. A working group that included the JDOP published a paper providing the concepts for the development and operation of a national weather radar network. In 1979, the NEXRAD Joint System Program Office was formed to move forward with the development and deployment of the proposed NEXRAD radar network. That year, the NSSL completed a formal report on developing the NEXRAD system.
When the proposal was presented to the Reagan administration, two options were considered to build the radar systems: allow corporate bids to build the systems based on the schematics of the previously developed prototype radar or seek contractors to build their own systems using predetermined specifications. The JSPO group opted to select a contractor to develop and produce the radars that would be used for the national network. Radar systems developed by Raytheon and Unisys were tested during the 1980s. However, it took four years to allow the prospective contractors to develop their proprietary models. Unisys was selected as the contractor, and was awarded a full-scale production contract in January 1990.
Installation of an operational prototype was completed in the fall of 1990 in Norman, Oklahoma. The first installation of a WSR-88D for operational use in daily forecasting was in Sterling, Virginia on June 12, 1992. The last system deployed as part of the installation program was installed in North Webster, Indiana on August 30, 1997. In 2011, the new Langley Hill NEXRAD was added at Langley Hill, Washington to better cover the Pacific Coast of that area; other radars also filled gaps in coverage at Evansville, Indiana and Ft. Smith, Arkansas, following the initial installations. The site locations were strategically chosen to provide overlapping coverage between radars in case one failed during a severe weather event. Where possible, they were co-located with NWS Weather Forecast Offices to permit quicker access by maintenance technicians.
The NEXRAD radars incorporated a number of improvements over the radar systems that were previously in use. The new system provided Doppler velocity, improving tornado prediction ability by detecting rotation present within the storm at different scan angles. It provided improved resolution and sensitivity, enabling operators to see features such as cold fronts, thunderstorm gust fronts, and mesoscale to even storm scale features of thunderstorms that had never been visible on radar. The NEXRAD radars also provided volumetric scans of the atmosphere allowing operators to examine the vertical structure of storms and can act as wind profilers by providing detailed wind information for several kilometers above the radar site. The radars also had a much increased range allowing detection of weather events at much greater distances from the radar site.
WSR-88D development, maintenance, and training are coordinated by the NEXRAD Radar Operations Center located at the National Weather Center in Norman, Oklahoma.
Radar properties
A standard WSR-88D operates in the S band, at a frequency of around 2800 MHz, with a typical gain around 53 dB using a center-fed parabolic antenna. The pulse repetition frequency varies from 318 to 1300 Hz with a maximum power output of 700 kW at Klystron output, although dependent on the volume coverage pattern selected by the operator. All NEXRADs have a dish diameter of 9.1 m and an aperture diameter of 8.5 m. Using the predetermined VCPs, NEXRADs have a traditional elevation minimum and maximum ranging from 0.1 to 19.5 degrees, although the non-operational minimum and maximum spans from −1 to +45 degrees. Unlike its predecessor, the WSR-74, the antenna can not be manually steered by the operator. WSR-88D Level I data is the recorded output of the digital receiver. Spatial resolution varies with data type and scan angle – level III data has a resolution of 1 km x 1 degree in azimuth, while super-res level II,, has a resolution of 250m by 0.5 degrees in azimuth below 2.4 degrees in elevation.Scan strategies
The NEXRAD radar system continually refreshes its three-dimensional database via one of several predetermined scan patterns. These patterns have differing PRFs to fit the respective use, but all have a constant resolution. Since the system samples the atmosphere in three dimensions, there are many variables that can be changed, depending on the desired output. With all traditional VCPs, the antenna scans at a maximum of 19.5 degrees in elevation, and a minimum of.5, with some coastal sites scanning as low as.2 or lower. Due to the incomplete elevation coverage, a phenomenon known as "The Cone of Silence" is present with all NEXRAD radars. The term describes the lack of coverage directly above the radar sites.There are currently seven Volume Coverage Patterns available to NWS meteorologists, with an eighth in the process of replacing one of the existing seven. Each VCP is a predefined set of instructions that control antenna rotation speed, elevation angle, transmitter pulse repetition frequency and pulse width. The radar operator chooses from the VCPs based on the type of weather occurring:
- Clear Air or Light Precipitation: VCP 31, 32, and 35
- Shallow Precipitation: VCP 35, 112, and 215
- Non-Tropical Convection: VCP 12, 212, and 215
- Tropical System Convection: VCP 212, 215, 112, and 121
| VCP | Scan time | Elevation scans | Elevation angles | Usage | SAILS available? |
| 12 | 4.2 | 14 | 0.5, 0.9, 1.3, 1.8, 2.4, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 6.4, 8, 10, 12.5, 15.6, 19.5 | Severe weather, including tornadoes, located closer to the radar | Yes |
| 212 | 4.5 | 14 | 0.5, 0.9, 1.3, 1.8, 2.4, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 6.4, 8, 10, 12.5, 15.6, 19.5 | Severe weather, including tornadoes, over 70 miles away from the radar, or widespread severe convection. Best VCP for MRLE use. Completion time for VCP 212 + 1 SAILS scan is similar to VCP 12 + 2 SAILS scans | Yes |
| 112 | 5.5 | 14 | 0.5, 0.9, 1.3, 1.8, 2.4, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 6.4, 8, 10, 12.5, 15.6, 19.5 | Variant of VCP 212 designed for tropical systems and strong, non-severe wind shear events. Uses a combination of MPDA and SZ-2 to form a contiguous velocity display. MRLE use is not possible with this VCP | Yes |
| 215 | 6 | 15 | 0.5, 0.9, 1.3, 1,8, 2.4, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 6.4, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16.7, 19.5 | General-purpose precipitation, including tropical systems capable of producing tornadoes. Most vertical resolution of any VCP | Yes |
| 121 | 6 | 9 | 0.5, 1.5, 2.4, 3.4, 4.3, 6, 9.9, 14.6, 19.5 | Legacy VCP, originally designed for tropical systems. Has significant gaps in vertical resolution above 6°. Scan strategy ensures 20 rotations in six minutes, heavily wearing antenna mechanical components. Similar completion time to VCP 215. To be replaced by VCP 112 | No |
| 31 | 10 | 5 | 0.5, 1.5, 2.4, 3.4, 4.3 | Long-pulse clear air mode designed for maximum sensitivity. Excellent for detecting light snow or subtle boundaries. Prone to detecting ground clutter. May be prone to detecting virga | No |
| 32 | 10 | 5 | 0.5, 1.5, 2.4, 3.4, 4.3 | Short-pulse clear air mode designed for clear air or isolated light rain and/or wintry precipitation. Ideal to use when no precipitation is in the radar range, to reduce wear on antenna mechanical components | No |
| 35 | 7 | 7 | 0.5, 0.9, 1.3, 1,8, 2.4, 3.1, 4, 5.1, 6.4 | Short-pulse clear air VCP designed for scattered to widespread light to moderate precipitation from non-convective cloudforms, especially nimbostratus. Not recommended for convection, except for pop-up thundershowers produced by Cumulus congestus clouds located 30 miles or more away from the radar | Yes |
The specific VCP currently in use at each NEXRAD site is available.
Enhancements
Super resolution
Deployed from March to August 2008 with all level II data, the Super Resolution upgrade permitted the capability of the radar to produce much higher resolution data. Under legacy resolution, the WSR-88D provides reflectivity data at by 1 degree to range, and velocity data at by 1 degree to a range of. Super Resolution provides reflectivity data with a sample size of by 0.5 degree, and increase the range of Doppler velocity data to. Initially, the increased resolution is only available in the lower scan elevations. Super resolution makes a compromise of slightly decreased noise reduction for a large gain in resolution.The improvement in azimuthal resolution increases the range at which tornadic mesoscale rotations can be detected. This allows for faster lead time on warnings and extends the useful range of the radar. The increased resolution increases the detail of such rotations, giving a more accurate representation of the storm. Along with providing better detail of detected precipitation and other mesoscale features, Super Resolution also provides additional detail to aid in other severe storm analysis. Super Resolution extends the range of velocity data and provides it faster than before, also allowing for faster lead time on potential tornado detection and subsequent warnings.
Dual polarization
WSR-88D sites across the nation have been upgraded to polarimetric radar, which adds a vertical polarization to the traditional horizontally polarized radar waves, in order to more accurately discern what is reflecting the signal. This so-called dual polarization allows the radar to distinguish between rain, hail, and snow, something the horizontally polarized radars cannot accurately do. Early trials showed that rain, ice pellets, snow, hail, birds, insects, and ground clutter all have different signatures with dual polarization, which could mark a significant improvement in forecasting winter storms and severe thunderstorms. The deployment of the dual polarization capability to NEXRAD sites began in 2010 and was completed by the summer of 2013. The radar at Vance Air Force Base in Enid, Oklahoma is the first operational WSR-88D modified to utilize dual polarization technology. The modified radar went into operation on March 3, 2011.AVSET
When the NEXRAD system was initially implemented, the radar automatically scanned all scan angles in a Volume Coverage Pattern, even if the highest scan angles were free of precipitation. As a result, in many cases when severe weather was farther from the radar site, forecasters could not provide as timely severe weather warnings as possible. The Automated Volume Scan Evaluation and Termination algorithm helps solve this problem by immediately ending the volume scan when precipitation returns at higher scan angles drop below a set threshold. This can often allow for more volume scans per hour, improving severe weather detection without the need for hardware upgrades AVSET was initially deployed in RPG build 12.3, in Fall of 2011.SAILS and MESO-SAILS
One of the primary weaknesses of the WSR-88D radar system was the lack of frequency of base scans, especially during severe weather. Forecasters, and TV viewers at home, often had access to images that were four or five minutes old, and therefore had inaccurate information. TV viewers at home could be lulled into a false sense of security that a tornado was farther away from them than it really was, endangering residents in the storm's path. The Supplemental Adaptive Intra-Volume Low-Level Scan technique, deployed with Build 14 in the first half of 2014, allows operators the option to run an additional base scan during the middle of a typical volume scan. With one SAILS cut active on VCP 212, base scans occur about once every two and a half minutes, with more frequent updates if AVSET terminates the volume scan early.Multiple Elevation Scan Option for Supplemental Adaptive Intra-Volume Low-Level Scan is an enhancement to SAILS, which allows the radar operator to run one, two or three additional base scans during the course of a volume scan, per the operators request. During June 2013, the Radar Operations Center first tested SAILSx2, which adds two additional low-level scans per volume. It was executed for approximately 4.5 hours and during the testing, an Electronics Technician observed the pedestal/antenna assembly's behavior. No excessive wear was noted. Two days later, SAILSx3 was executed, which added 3 additional low-level scans to a volume. During this 1.5 hour test of SAILSx3, a ROC Radar Hardware Engineer accompanied the ROC Electronics Technician to observe the antenna/pedestal assembly. Again, no excessive wear was noted. MESO-SAILS was deployed with Build 16.1, in spring of 2016.
MRLE
Mid-Volume Rescan of Low-Level Elevations is a dynamic scanning option for the WSR-88D derived from MESO-SAILS, a separate scanning option implemented in NEXRAD RPG 14.0, in the Spring of 2014.During quasi-linear convective systems, colloquially known as squall lines, the detection of mesovortices, which generate at 4,000 to 8,000 feet above ground level, is not always possible with SAILS cuts, as the base 0.5 degree scan travels below the formation of mesovortices at closer distances to the radar. MRLE consecutively scans either the two, three or four lowest scan angles during the middle of a typical volume scan, allowing more frequent surveillance of mesovortex formation during QLCS events. MRLE will be deployed on a non-operational basis in RPG 18.0 in spring of 2018, with possible operational deployment with RPG 19.0, if proven useful or of importance.
Deployment was anticipated by the Radar Operations Center to commence in October 2017, along with the RPG 18.0 build, on a non-operational basis. The scanning option will only be available for use with Volume Coverage Patterns 21, 12, 212, and additionally 215. If proven to be significant in terms of warning dissemination, MRLE will deploy operationally nationwide with RPG 18.0, planned for 2018.
Concept
The concept of MRLE derives from the need of more frequent low-level scans during quasi-linear convective systems. During QLCSs, it is not uncommon for brief and otherwise un-noticeable mesovortices to spawn at points along the line. Due to untimely radar data and time being taken to complete the entire volume, these vortices often spawn without warning or prior notice. With MRLE, the operator has the choice between 2 and 4 low-level scans. Unlike MESO-SAILS, which scans at one angle and can only do up to 3 low-level scans per volume, MRLE scans at 4 possible angles, and can cut into a volume up to 4 times, depending on the operators choice. The angles are as followed, alongside their respective scan frequencies:- MRLEx2 = 0.5° and 0.9° elevations
- MRLEx3 = 0.5°, 0.9° and 1.3° elevations
- MRLEx4 = 0.5°, 0.9°, 1.3° and 1.8° elevations
Service Life Extension Program
Started on March 13, 2013, the SLEP, or Service Life Extension Program, is an extensive effort to keep and maintain the current NEXRAD network in working order for as long as possible. These improvements include Signal Processor upgrades, Pedestal upgrades, Transmitter upgrades, and shelter upgrades. The program is anticipated to be finished by 2022, which coincides with the beginnings of a nationwide implementation of Multi-function Phased Array Radars.Coverage gaps
WSR-88D has coverage gaps below 10,000 feet in many parts of the continental United States, often for terrain or budgetary reasons, or remoteness of the area. Such notable gaps include most of Alaska; several areas of Oregon, including the central and southern coast and much of the area east of the Cascade Mountains; many portions of the Rocky Mountains; Pierre, South Dakota; portions of northern Texas; large portions of the Nebraska panhandle; an area near the Connecticut River in Vermont; and areas near the borders of the Oklahoma and Texas Panhandles. Notably, many of these gaps lie in tornado alley. At least one tornado has gone undetected by WSR-88D as a result of such a coverage gap – an EF1 tornado in Lovelady, Texas in April 2014. As a result of the coverage gap, initial reports of tornadic activity were treated with skepticism by the local National Weather Service forecast office.Coverage gaps can also be caused during radar outages, especially in areas with little to no overlapping coverage. For example, a hardware failure on July 16, 2013 resulted in an outage and coverage gap for the Albany, New York area that lasted through early August.
A coverage gap in North Carolina encouraged Senator Richard Burr to propose S. 2058, also known as the Metropolitan Weather Hazard Protection Act of 2015. The act mandates that any city with a population of 700,000 or more must have Doppler Radar coverage <6,000 feet above ground level. The bill passed the Senate, but died in a House committee.
It is not likely that additional WSR-88Ds will be deployed, as the production line was shut down in 1997, and the National Weather Service has an insufficient budget to restart production. In 2011, a known coverage gap was filled when the Langley Hill radar in southwestern Washington was installed, using the last remaining spare. This radar opportunity was spearheaded by a public campaign led by Professor Cliff Mass at the University of Washington, and likely helped the NWS office in Portland, Oregon issue a timely warning for the Manzanita, OR EF-2 tornado in October, 2016.
Destroyed radars
The NEXRAD site located in Cayey, Puerto Rico was destroyed during the passage of Hurricane Maria through the region in September 2017. In addition to a neighboring TDWR site that was rendered temporarily inoperable but ultimately survived, the Department of Defense deployed two short-range X-band radars on the island to provide radar coverage until the FAA-maintained NEXRAD site was restored. In June 2018, this NEXRAD radar site was restored to fully operational condition and was reinforced with several lightning rods and secured with a stronger fiberglass dome that included using more than 3,000 bolts.Future enhancements
Current NEXRAD system
The National Weather Service keeps a list of upcoming improvements to the WSR-88D system.Multi-function Phased Array Radar (MPAR)
Beyond dual-polarization, the advent of phased array radar will probably be the next major improvement in severe weather detection. Its ability to rapidly scan large areas would give an enormous advantage to radar meteorologists. Its additional ability to track both known and unknown aircraft in three dimensions would allow a phased array network to simultaneously replace the current Air Route Surveillance Radar network, saving the United States government billions of dollars in maintenance costs. Any large-scale installation by the NWS and Department of Defense is unlikely to occur before 2020. The National Severe Storms Laboratory predicts that a phased array system will eventually replace the current network of WSR-88D radar transmitters.Applications
Usage
NEXRAD data is used in multiple ways. It is used by National Weather Service meteorologists and is freely available to users outside of the NWS, including researchers, media, and private citizens. The primary goal of NEXRAD data is to aid NWS meteorologists in operational forecasting. The data allows them to accurately track precipitation and anticipate its development and track. More importantly, it allows the meteorologists to track and anticipate severe weather and tornadoes. Combined with ground reports, tornado and severe thunderstorm warnings can be issued to alert the public about dangerous storms. NEXRAD data also provides information about rainfall rate and aids in hydrological forecasting. Data is provided to the public in several forms, the most basic form being graphics published to the NWS website. Data is also available in two similar, but different, raw formats. Available directly from the NWS is Level III data, consisting of reduced resolution, low-bandwidth base products as well as many derived, post-processed products; Level II data consists of only the base products, but at their original resolution. Because of the higher bandwidth costs, Level II data is not available directly from the NWS. The NWS distributes this data freely to Amazon Web Services and several top-tier universities, which in turn distribute the data to private organizations.Operational locations
| State | City or Place Name | ICAO Location Identifier | Coordinates |
| PR | San Juan | ||
| ME | Houlton | ||
| ME | Gray/Portland | ||
| VT | Burlington | ||
| MA | Boston | ||
| NY | Albany | ||
| NY | Binghamton | ||
| NY | Buffalo | ||
| NY | Montague | ||
| NY | New York City | ||
| DE | Dover AFB | ||
| PA | Philadelphia | ||
| PA | Pittsburgh | ||
| PA | State College | ||
| WV | Charleston | ||
| VA | Norfolk/Richmond | ||
| VA | Roanoke | ||
| VA | Sterling | ||
| NC | Morehead City | ||
| NC | Raleigh/Durham | ||
| NC | Wilmington | ||
| SC | Charleston | ||
| SC | Columbia | ||
| SC | Greer | ||
| GA | Atlanta | ||
| GA | Moody AFB | ||
| GA | Robins AFB | ||
| FL | Eglin AFB | ||
| FL | Jacksonville | ||
| FL | Key West | ||
| FL | Melbourne | ||
| FL | Miami | ||
| FL | Tallahassee | ||
| FL | Tampa | ||
| AL | Birmingham | ||
| AL | Fort Rucker | ||
| AL | Huntsville | ||
| AL | Maxwell AFB | ||
| AL | Mobile | ||
| MS | Brandon/Jackson | ||
| MS | Columbus AFB | ||
| TN | Knoxville/Tri Cities | ||
| TN | Memphis | ||
| TN | Nashville | ||
| KY | Fort Campbell | ||
| KY | Jackson | ||
| KY | Louisville | ||
| KY | Paducah | ||
| OH | Wilmington | ||
| OH | Cleveland | ||
| MI | Detroit/Pontiac | ||
| MI | Gaylord | ||
| MI | Grand Rapids | ||
| MI | Marquette | ||
| IN | Owensville | ||
| IN | Indianapolis | ||
| IN | North Webster | ||
| IL | Chicago | ||
| IL | Lincoln | ||
| WI | Green Bay | ||
| WI | La Crosse | ||
| WI | Milwaukee | ||
| MN | Duluth | ||
| MN | Minneapolis/St. Paul | ||
| IA | Davenport | ||
| IA | Des Moines | ||
| MO | Kansas City | ||
| MO | Springfield | ||
| MO | St. Louis | ||
| AR | Fort Smith | ||
| AR | Little Rock | ||
| LA | Fort Polk | ||
| LA | Lake Charles | ||
| LA | New Orleans | ||
| LA | Shreveport | ||
| TX | Amarillo | ||
| TX | Austin/San Antonio | ||
| TX | Brownsville | ||
| TX | Corpus Christi | ||
| TX | Dallas/Ft. Worth | ||
| TX | Dyess AFB | ||
| TX | El Paso | ||
| TX | Fort Hood | ||
| TX | Houston/Galveston | ||
| TX | Laughlin AFB | ||
| TX | Lubbock | ||
| TX | Midland/Odessa | ||
| TX | San Angelo | ||
| OK | Frederick | ||
| OK | Oklahoma City | ||
| OK | Norman | No Level III Data | |
| OK | Tulsa | ||
| OK | Vance AFB | ||
| KS | Dodge City | ||
| KS | Goodland | ||
| KS | Topeka | ||
| KS | Wichita | ||
| NE | Grand Island/Hastings | ||
| NE | North Platte | ||
| NE | Omaha | ||
| SD | Aberdeen | ||
| SD | Rapid City | ||
| SD | Sioux Falls | ||
| ND | Bismarck | ||
| ND | Grand Forks | ||
| ND | Minot AFB | ||
| MT | Billings | ||
| MT | Glasgow | ||
| MT | Great Falls | ||
| MT | Missoula | ||
| WY | Cheyenne | ||
| WY | Riverton | ||
| CO | Denver | ||
| CO | Grand Junction | ||
| CO | Pueblo | ||
| NM | Albuquerque | ||
| NM | Cannon AFB | ||
| NM | Holloman AFB | ||
| AZ | Flagstaff | ||
| AZ | Phoenix | ||
| AZ | Tucson | ||
| AZ | Yuma | ||
| UT | Cedar City | ||
| UT | Salt Lake City | ||
| ID | Boise | ||
| ID | Pocatello/Idaho Falls | ||
| NV | Elko | ||
| NV | Las Vegas | ||
| NV | Reno | ||
| CA | Beale AFB | ||
| CA | Edwards AFB | ||
| CA | Eureka | ||
| CA | Los Angeles | ||
| CA | Sacramento | ||
| CA | San Diego | ||
| CA | San Francisco | ||
| CA | San Joaquin Valley | ||
| CA | Santa Ana Mountains | ||
| CA | Vandenberg AFB | ||
| HI | Kauai | ||
| HI | Kohala | ||
| HI | Molokai | ||
| HI | South Shore | ||
| OR | Medford | ||
| OR | Pendleton | ||
| OR | Portland | ||
| WA | Langley Hill | ||
| WA | Seattle/Tacoma | ||
| WA | Spokane | ||
| AK | Bethel | ||
| AK | Fairbanks/Pedro Dome | ||
| AK | Kenai | ||
| AK | King Salmon | ||
| AK | Middleton Island | ||
| AK | Nome | ||
| AK | Sitka/Biorka Island | ||
| GU | Andersen AFB | ||
| NA | Lajes Field, Azores | LPLA | |
| SK | Kunsan Air Base, South Korea | RKJK | |
| SK | Camp Humphreys, South Korea | RKSG | |
| JP | Kadena Air Base, Japan | RODN |