Noasauridae


Noasauridae was a family of diverse theropod dinosaurs from the group Ceratosauria. They were closely related to the short-armed abelisaurids, although most noasaurids had a much more traditional body types generally similar to other theropods. Their heads, on the other hand, had unusual adaptations depending on the subfamily. 'Traditional' noasaurids, sometimes grouped in the subfamily Noasaurinae, had sharp teeth which splayed outwards from a downturned lower jaw.
The most complete and well-known example of these kinds of noasaurids was Masiakasaurus knopfleri from Madagascar. Another group, Elaphrosaurinae, has also been placed within Noasauridae by some studies. Elaphrosaurines developed toothless jaws and herbivorous diets, at least as adults.
The most complete and well known elaphrosaurine was Limusaurus inextricabilis. At least some noasaurids had pneumatised cervical vertebrae. Some are considered to have had cursorial habits. Noasauridae is defined as all theropods closer to Noasaurus than to Carnotaurus.

Description

Noasauridae was a very diverse group, with the two most complete members, Masiakasaurus and Limusaurus, showing unusual features very different from each other. Masiakasaurus had an unusually downturned jaw, with long and sharply pointed spoon-shaped teeth. Some of these teeth were nearly horizontal in orientation. Limusaurus, on the other hand, was completely toothless as an adult and likely possessed a horny beak. This large disparity means that it is difficult to find any skull features shared by members of Noasauridae as a whole.
, the most complete and well-known noasaurine|left
Noasaurids had longer arms than their relatives the abelisaurids, whose arms were tiny and diminished. Although by no means as large or specialized as the arms of advanced bird-like theropods, noasaurid arms were nevertheless capable of movement and use, possibly even for hunting in large-clawed genera such as Noasaurus. Some genera such as Limusaurus did have somewhat reduced arms and hands, but far from the extent that abelisaurids acquired. Noasaurids were also nimble and lightly built, with feet showing adaptations for running such as a long central foot bone. Noasaurids varied in size, from the small Velocisaurus which was under 5 feet long, to much larger genera such as Elaphrosaurus and Deltadromeus, which were more than 20 feet in length.
A collection of features which characterize noasaurids in particular has been compiled by Rauhut & Carrano, who included controversial taxa such as Deltadromeus and the elaphrosaurines within Noasauridae. If these groups did not belong to Noasauridae as the study claims, then these similarities are examples of convergent evolution. Among the most prominent traits relate to the shoulder region. In this family, the long, upward-stretching scapula merges with the smaller and more compact coracoid, forming a fused shoulder bone known as a scapulocoracoid. While the presence of a scapulocoracoid is by no means unique to this family, noasaurids do have particularly large and wide scapulocoracoids, with a tall and semicircular coracoid region. The hooked rear edge of the coracoid region is also offset from the glenoid by a large U-shaped notch. The humerus was thin and straight, with a low and somewhat rounded humeral head. In contrast, abelisaurids had a large and bulbous humeral head while that of other theropods was flattened from front to back.
, the most complete and well-known elaphrosaurine
The leg is also somewhat characteristic in members of this family. The tibia was flattened from the front near the foot, although it was rounded further up the leg. As in other theropods, the femur of a noasaurid had a ridge along the inner rear surface, known as a fourth trochanter. However, in noasaurines and elaphrosaurines, this fourth trochanter was much smaller and lower than the enlarged crest-like structure present in the majority of basal theropods; only a few other groups of theropods also have reduced fourth trochanters. In addition, the two subfamilies have a metatarsal II which was flattened from the side. Further reductions to this metatarsal were present in noasaurines. In these genera as well as Deltadromeus, metatarsal IV also became reduced in some respects.
In all noasaurids, the mid caudals had very low neural spines. The cervical vertebrae, on the other hand, were quite varied within this family. In noasaurines and a few other genera, the neural spines of vertebrae at the front of the neck were positioned towards the front part of their respective vertebrae. This is quite unusual compared to other theropods, which have neural spines roughly midway down their vertebrae. These genera also have long and spine-like epipophyses on the cervicals of most of the neck, although they diminish near the neck. Epipophyses are bony projections located above the postzygapophyses. Elaphrosaurines, on the other hand, have cervical epipophyses which are much more diminished or even absent in the case of Elaphrosaurus. Many noasaurids are only known from vertebrae, including both valid and dubious genera.

Noasaurinae

Noasaurines are Late Cretaceous noasaurids known exclusively from southern continents and islands such as South America, Madagascar, and India. In 2020 indeterminate remains were described from the Barremian-Aptian and Cenomanian of Australia. Members of this subfamily are definitively part of Noasauridae, although this group may not necessarily be elevated to subfamily status whenever elaphrosaurines are found to be outside of Noasauridae. Many members of this subfamily are quite fragmentary, and as a result the appearance and biology of the average noasaurine must be inferred from the most complete member of the group, Masiakasaurus. Rauhut & Carrano define Noasaurinae as "all noasaurids more closely related to Noasaurus than to Elaphrosaurus, Abelisaurus, Ceratosaurus, or Allosaurus".
Masiakasaurus had a downturned lower jaw with long teeth splaying forwards. These teeth were spoon-shaped with sharply pointed tips and serrations along their outer edge. The rest of the teeth in the mouth were similar to the teeth of more conventional theropods. The rest of the body was also more similar to that of conventional theropods, with a neck, arms, and legs of moderate length. At least one noasaurine, the eponymous Noasaurus, had a large and deeply curved "sickle-shaped" claw of the hand. The diet of noasaurines is difficult to determine, with hypotheses ranging from fish to insects or other small animals.
Rauhut & Carrano found only a single unambiguous trait used to diagnose noasaurines to the exception of other noasaurids. That trait is the fact that their metatarsal II has a diminished proximal end. One noasaurine, Velocisaurus, took this trait even further, with both its metatarsal II and IV reduced to very thin rod-like bones along their entire length.

Elaphrosaurinae

It is not entirely certain if elaphrosaurines are legitimate examples of noasaurids. Both Limusaurus and Elaphrosaurus have been considered basal ceratosaurians by many studies, with most of these studies considering them even more primitive than Ceratosaurus. The most well-known elaphrosaurines lived during the Jurassic period, much older than the Late Cretaceous period noasaurines. Nevertheless, the existence of Eoabelisaurus shows that even abelisaurids had evolved by the Middle Jurassic, and Cretaceous elaphrosaurines such as Huinculsaurus have been discovered. It would make sense for Noasauridae to have evolved during the Jurassic, meaning that the early appearance of elaphrosaurines would not preclude a within Noasauridae. In 2016, a redescription of Elaphrosaurus by Oliver Rauhut and Matthew Carrano argued against earlier hypotheses that elaphrosaurines were basal ceratosaurs, instead placing them alongside noasaurines within a monophyletic Noasauridae. This study formally defined Elaphrosaurinae as "all noasaurids more closely related to Elaphrosaurus than to Noasaurus, Abelisaurus, Ceratosaurus, or Allosaurus".
Generally speaking, elaphrosaurines were lightly built theropods, with small skulls and long necks and legs. If Limusaurus is any indication, adult elaphrosaurines were completely toothless, and their mouths were probably edged with a horny beak. It is likely that Limusaurus and other elaphrosaurines were primarily herbivorous as adults, due to mature Limusaurus specimens preserving gastroliths and chemical signatures resembling those of herbivorous dinosaurs. However, juvenile Limusaurus specimens retained teeth and lacked these signs of herbivory, meaning that young elaphrosaurines may have been more capable of a carnivorous or omnivorous diet. The largest known noasaurid, Elaphrosaurus, is the namesake of Elaphrosaurinae. Members of this genus could grow up to 20 feet long, although they were significantly lighter than similarly-sized carnivorous contemporaries such as Ceratosaurus.
Rauhut & Carrano listed several features which could be used to diagnose Elaphrosaurinae. Elaphrosaurine cervical vertebrae are amphicoelous, meaning that both their front and rear faces are concave, particularly the front face which is quite strongly concave. While strongly concave front faces are common among many archosaurs, they are quite rare in all but the most basal theropods. Carnosaurs, megalosauroids, coelurosaurs, and most other ceratosaurians all have vertebrae which have front faces ranging from very weakly concave to flat or convex. Another notable feature of elaphrosaurine cervical vertebrae is that their cervical ribs are completely fused to the centrum of their corresponding vertebrae.
Elaphrosaurines also have several diagnostic hip features. The hip is quite small compared to their long legs. The femur is more than 1.3 times the length of the ilium in members of this subfamily, while most other ceratosaurians have shorter legs and a femur approximately the same length of the ilium. The connection between the ilium and the pubis is also more simple than in other ceratosaurians. While other ceratosaurians have a peg-and-socket connection between the two bones, elaphrosaurines simply have a flat contact between the two.
In 2020 a middle cervical vertebra from the lower Albian Eumeralla Formation of Cape Otway, Victoria, Australia was referred to Elaphrosaurinae. This is the first evidence of Elaphrosaurinae from Australia.

Classification

The following cladogram is based on the phylogenetic analysis conducted by Rauhut and Carrano in 2016, showing the relationships among the Noasauridae:
Even in recent studies, the composition of Noasauridae has been difficult to resolve. An analysis conducted by Tortosa et al. recovered Dahalokely as a basal noasaurid. However, another analysis later that year found it to be a basal carnotaurine instead. Similarly, the genus Genusaurus has been found to be a noasaurid by some older studies, but other studies have classified it as an abelisaurid.Deltadromeus is a particularly controversial genus, as it shares many features with noasaurids but is also very similar to Gualicho, which has been classified as a close relative of the enigmatic megaraptorans. A 2017 study describing ontogenetic changes in Limusaurus and the affect of juvenile taxa on phylogenetic analyses provided various phylogenetic trees which varied based on which Limusaurus specimens were used. The structure of Noasauridae changed greatly depending on the age of the Limusaurus specimens, although Genusaurus and Deltadromeus'' were resolved as noasaurids in each diagnosis.
Timeline of descriptions of genera


ImageSize = width:1500px height:auto barincrement:15px
PlotArea = left:10px bottom:50px top:10px right:10px
Period = from:1900 till:2100
TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal
ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:50 start:1900
ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:10 start:1900
TimeAxis = orientation:hor
AlignBars = justify
Colors =
#legends
id:CAR value:claret
id:ANK value:rgb
id:HER value:teal
id:HAD value:green
id:OMN value:blue
id:black value:black
id:white value:white
id:1900s value:rgb
id:2000s value:rgb
id:2000syears value:rgb
id:1900syears value:rgb
id:1700s value:rgb
id:1700syears value:rgb
id:latecretaceous value:rgb
id:1800syears value:rgb
id:paleogene value:rgb
id:paleocene value:rgb
id:eocene value:rgb
id:oligocene value:rgb
id:1800s value:rgb
id:miocene value:rgb
id:pliocene value:rgb
id:quaternary value:rgb
id:pleistocene value:rgb
id:holocene value:rgb
BarData=
bar:eratop
bar:space
bar:periodtop
bar:space
bar:NAM1
bar:NAM2
bar:NAM3
bar:NAM4
bar:space
bar:period
bar:space
bar:era
PlotData=
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark: width:25
shift:

bar:periodtop
from: 1900 till: 1910 color:1900syears text:00s
from: 1910 till: 1920 color:1900syears text:10s
from: 1920 till: 1930 color:1900syears text:20s
from: 1930 till: 1940 color:1900syears text:30s
from: 1940 till: 1950 color:1900syears text:40s
from: 1950 till: 1960 color:1900syears text:50s
from: 1960 till: 1970 color:1900syears text:60s
from: 1970 till: 1980 color:1900syears text:70s
from: 1980 till: 1990 color:1900syears text:80s
from: 1990 till: 2000 color:1900syears text:90s
from: 2000 till: 2010 color:2000syears text:00s
from: 2010 till: 2020 color:2000syears text:10s
from: 2020 till: 2030 color:2000syears text:20s
from: 2030 till: 2040 color:2000syears text:30s
from: 2040 till: 2050 color:2000syears text:40s
from: 2050 till: 2060 color:2000syears text:50s
from: 2060 till: 2070 color:2000syears text:60s
from: 2070 till: 2080 color:2000syears text:70s
from: 2080 till: 2090 color:2000syears text:80s
from: 2090 till: 2100 color:2000syears text:90s
bar:eratop
from: 1900 till: 2000 color:1900s text:20th
from: 2000 till: 2100 color:2000s text:21st
PlotData=
align:left fontsize:M mark: width:5 anchor:till align:left
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:1920 mark: text:Elaphrosaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM2 at:1933 mark: text:Laevisuchus
color:1900s bar:NAM3 at:1933 mark: text:Compsosuchus
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:1980 mark: text:Noasaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM2 at:1991 mark: text:Velocisaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM3 at:1996 mark: text:Ligabueino
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:2001 mark: text:Masiakasaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM2 at:2004 mark: text:Spinostropheus
color:1900s bar:NAM3 at:2009 mark: text:Limusaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:2019 mark: text:Vespersaurus
PlotData=
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark: width:25
bar:period
from: 1900 till: 1910 color:1900syears text:00s
from: 1910 till: 1920 color:1900syears text:10s
from: 1920 till: 1930 color:1900syears text:20s
from: 1930 till: 1940 color:1900syears text:30s
from: 1940 till: 1950 color:1900syears text:40s
from: 1950 till: 1960 color:1900syears text:50s
from: 1960 till: 1970 color:1900syears text:60s
from: 1970 till: 1980 color:1900syears text:70s
from: 1980 till: 1990 color:1900syears text:80s
from: 1990 till: 2000 color:1900syears text:90s
from: 2000 till: 2010 color:2000syears text:00s
from: 2010 till: 2020 color:2000syears text:10s
from: 2020 till: 2030 color:2000syears text:20s
from: 2030 till: 2040 color:2000syears text:30s
from: 2040 till: 2050 color:2000syears text:40s
from: 2050 till: 2060 color:2000syears text:50s
from: 2060 till: 2070 color:2000syears text:60s
from: 2070 till: 2080 color:2000syears text:70s
from: 2080 till: 2090 color:2000syears text:80s
from: 2090 till: 2100 color:2000syears text:90s
bar:era
from: 1900 till: 2000 color:1900s text:20th
from: 2000 till: 2100 color:2000s text:21st