The term On refers to counting phonetic sounds inJapanese poetry. In the Japanese language, the word "on" means "sound". It is used to mean the phonetic units counted in haiku, tanka, and other such poetic forms. Known as "morae" to English-speaking linguists, the modern Japanese term for the linguistic concept is either haku or mōra. Ji is Japanese for "symbol" or "character". The concatenation of the two words"on" and "ji" into "onji" was used by Meiji era grammarians to mean "phonic character" and was translated into English by Nishi Amane in 1870 as "letter". Since then, the term "onji" has become obsolete in Japan, and only survives in foreign-language discussion of Japanese poetry. Gilbert and Yoneoka call the use of the word"onji" "bizarre and mistaken". It was taken up after a 1978 letter to Frogpond: Journal of the Haiku Society of America decrying the then-current use of the word "jion", which itself appears to have arisen in error. The normal Japanese term in the context of counting sounds in poetry is "on". Counting on in Japanese poetry is the same as counting characters when the text is transliterated into hiragana. In cases where a hiragana is represented by a pair of symbols each pair equates to a single on. When viewed this way, the term "ji" is used in Japanese. In English-language discussions of Japanese poetry, the more familiar word "syllable" is sometimes used. Although the use of "syllable" is inaccurate, it sometimes happens that the syllable count and the on count match in Japanese-language haiku. The disjunction between syllables and on becomes clearer when counting sounds in English-language versions of Japanese poetic forms, such as haiku in English. An English syllable may contain one, two or three morae and, because English word sounds are not readily representable in hiragana, a single syllable may require many more ji to be transliterated into hiragana. There is disagreement among linguists as to the definitions of "syllable" and "mora". In contrast, ji is unambiguously defined by reference to hiragana.
Examples
To illustrate the distinction between on and syllables, the following four words each contain the same number of on, but different numbers of syllables:
rōmaji
on
hiragana
kanji
syllables
Comparison
Nagasaki
na-ga-sa-ki
な.が.さ.き
長崎
na-ga-sa-ki
4 on; 4 syllables.
Ōsaka
o-o-sa-ka
お.お.さ.か
大阪
ō-sa-ka
4 on; 3 syllables.
Tōkyō
to-u-kyo-u
と.う.きょ.う
東京
tō-kyō
4 on; 2 syllables.
Nippon
ni-p-po-n
に.っ.ぽ.ん
日本
nip-pon
4 on; 2 syllables.
Nihon
ni-ho-n
に.ほ.ん
日本
ni-hon
3 on; 2 syllables
The examples show the various ways in which hiragana differ from syllables. In Nagasaki each hiragana character represents a single on, and hence the four hiragana are also four syllables. In Ōsaka, the initial O is a long vowel, and hence counts as two on. Tōkyō includes two long vowels, which contribute two on each in Japanese but only one syllable each in English, which does not distinguish long vowels from short; meanwhile kyō is perceived by Japanese speakers to be a single sound but in this context is perceived by English speakers as two syllables.. In Nippon the doubled "P" each is pronounced separately; the final "N" is also a separate hiragana, so the two English syllables translate to four on.
