In the case that W is the subspace of spanned by the rows of the next matrix, its orthogonal complement W⊥ is spanned by the three row-vectors of The fact that every vector on the first list is orthogonal to every vector on the second list can be checked by direct computation. The fact that the spans of these vectors are orthogonal then follows by bilinearity of the dot product. Finally, the fact that these spaces are orthogonal complementsfollows from the dimension relationships given below.
General bilinear forms
Let be a vector space over a field equipped with a bilinear form. We define to be left-orthogonal to, and to be right-orthogonal to, when. For a subset of we define the left orthogonal complement to be There is a corresponding definition of right orthogonal complement. For a reflexive bilinear form, where implies for all and in, the left and right complements coincide. This will be the case if is a symmetric or an alternating form. The definition extends to a bilinear form on a free module over a commutative ring, and to a sesquilinear form extended to include any free module over a commutative ring with conjugation.
Properties
An orthogonal complement is a subspace of ;
If then ;
The radical of is a subspace of every orthogonal complement;
The orthogonal complement is always closed in the metric topology. In finite-dimensional spaces, that is merely an instance of the fact that all subspaces of a vector space are closed. In infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces, some subspaces are not closed, but all orthogonal complements are closed. In such spaces, the orthogonal complement of the orthogonal complement of is the closure of, i.e., Some other useful properties that always hold are the following. Let be a Hilbert space and let and be its linear subspaces. Then:
For a finite-dimensional inner product space of dimension n, the orthogonal complement of a k-dimensional subspace is an -dimensional subspace, and the double orthogonal complement is the original subspace: If A is an matrix, where,, and refer to the row space, column space, and null space of A, we have
There is a natural analog of this notion in general Banach spaces. In this case one defines the orthogonal complement of W to be a subspace of the dual of V defined similarly as the annihilator It is always a closed subspace of V∗. There is also an analog of the double complement property. W⊥⊥ is now a subspace of V∗∗. However, the reflexive spaces have a natural isomorphismi between V and V∗∗. In this case we have This is a rather straightforward consequence of the Hahn–Banach theorem.