For positive integer arguments, the gamma function coincides with the factorial. That is, and hence and so on. For non-positive integers, the gamma function is not defined. For positive half-integers, the function values are given exactly by or equivalently, for non-negative integer values of : where denotes the double factorial. In particular, and by means of the reflection formula,
In analogy with the half-integer formula, where denotes the th multifactorial of. Numerically, It is unknown whether these constants are transcendental in general, but and were shown to be transcendental by G. V. Chudnovsky. has also long been known to be transcendental, and Yuri Nesterenko proved in 1996 that,, and are algebraically independent. The number is related to Gauss's constant by and it has been conjectured by Gramain that where is the Masser–Gramain constant, although numerical work by Melquiond et al. indicates that this conjecture is false. Borwein and Zucker have found that can be expressed algebraically in terms of,,,, and where is a complete elliptic integral of the first kind. This permits efficiently approximating the gamma function of rational arguments to high precision using quadratically convergentarithmetic–geometric mean iterations. No similar relations are known for or other denominators. In particular, where AGM is the arithmetic–geometric mean, we have Other formulas include the infinite products and where is the Glaisher–Kinkelin constant and is Catalan's constant. The following two representations for were given by I. Mező and where and are two of the Jacobi theta functions.
Products
Some product identities include: In general: From those products can be deduced other values, for example, from the former equations for, and, can be deduced: Other rational relations include and many more relations for where the denominator d divides 24 or 60. Gamma quotients with algebraic values must be "poised" in the sense that the sum of arguments is the same for the denominator and the numerator. A more sophisticated example:
Imaginary and complex arguments
The gamma function at the imaginary unit gives, : It may also be given in terms of the Barnes -function: Curiously enough, appears in the below integral evaluation: Here denotes the fractional part. Because of the Euler Reflection Formula, and the fact that, we have an expression for the modulus squared of the Gamma function evaluated on the imaginary axis: The above integral therefore relates to the phase of. The gamma function with other complex arguments returns