Poincaré recurrence theorem


In physics, the Poincaré recurrence theorem states that certain systems will, after a sufficiently long but finite time, return to a state arbitrarily close to, or exactly the same as, their initial state.
The Poincaré recurrence time is the length of time elapsed until the recurrence; this time may vary greatly depending on the exact initial state and required degree of closeness. The result applies to isolated mechanical systems subject to some constraints, e.g., all particles must be bound to a finite volume. The theorem is commonly discussed in the context of ergodic theory, dynamical systems and statistical mechanics.
The theorem is named after Henri Poincaré, who discussed it in 1890 and proved by Constantin Carathéodory using measure theory in 1919.

Precise formulation

Any dynamical system defined by an ordinary differential equation determines a flow map f t mapping phase space on itself. The system is said to be volume-preserving if the volume of a set in phase space is invariant under the flow. For instance, all Hamiltonian systems are volume-preserving because of Liouville's theorem. The theorem is then: If a flow preserves volume and has only bounded orbits, then for each open set there exist orbits that intersect the set infinitely often.

Discussion of proof

The proof, speaking qualitatively, hinges on two premises:
  1. A finite upper bound can be set on the total potentially accessible phase space volume. For a mechanical system, this bound can be provided by requiring that the system is contained in a bounded physical region of space – combined with the conservation of energy, this locks the system into a finite region in phase space.
  2. The phase volume of a finite element under dynamics is conserved.
Imagine any finite starting volume of phase space and follow its path under dynamics of the system. The volume "sweeps" points of phase space as it evolves, and the "front" of this sweeping has a constant size. Over time the explored phase volume grows linearly, at least at first. But, because the accessible phase volume is finite, the phase tube volume must eventually saturate because it cannot grow larger than the accessible volume. This means that the phase tube must intersect itself. In order to intersect itself, however, it must do so by first passing through the starting volume. Therefore, at least a finite fraction of the starting volume is recurring.
Now, consider the size of the non-returning portion of the starting phase volume – that portion that never returns to the starting volume. Using the principle just discussed in the last paragraph, we know that if the non-returning portion is finite, then a finite part of the non-returning portion must return. But that would be a contradiction, since any part of the non-returning portion that returns, also returns to the original starting volume. Thus, the non-returning portion of the starting volume cannot be finite and must be infinitely smaller than the starting volume itself. Q.E.D.
The theorem does not comment on certain aspects of recurrence which this proof cannot guarantee:
Let
be a finite measure space and let
be a measure-preserving transformation. Below are two alternative statements of the theorem.

Theorem 1

For any, the set of those points of for which there exists such that for all has zero measure.
In other words, almost every point of returns to. In fact, almost every point returns infinitely often; i.e.
For a proof, see the cited reference.

Theorem 2

The following is a topological version of this theorem:
If is a second-countable Hausdorff space and contains the Borel sigma-algebra, then the set of recurrent points of has full measure. That is, almost every point is recurrent.
For a proof, see the cited reference.

Quantum mechanical version

For time-independent quantum mechanical systems with discrete energy eigenstates, a similar theorem holds. For every and there exists a time T larger than, such that, where denotes the state vector of the system at time t.
The essential elements of the proof are as follows. The system evolves in time according to:
where the are the energy eigenvalues, and the are the energy eigenstates. The squared norm of the difference of the state vector at time and time zero, can be written as:
We can truncate the summation at some n = N independent of T, because
which can be made arbitrarily small by increasing N, as the summation, being the squared norm of the initial state, converges to 1.
The finite sum
can be made arbitrarily small for specific choices of the time T, according to the following construction. Choose an arbitrary, and then choose T such that there are integers that satisfies
for all numbers. For this specific choice of T,
As such, we have:
The state vector thus returns arbitrarily close to the initial state.