Redistribution of Seats Act 1885
The Redistribution of Seats Act 1885 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It was a piece of electoral reform legislation that redistributed the seats in the House of Commons, introducing the concept of equally populated constituencies, a concept in the broader global context termed equal apportionment, in an attempt to equalise representation across the UK. It was associated with, but not part of, the Representation of the People Act 1884.
Background
The first major reform of Commons' seats took place under the Reform Act 1832. The second major reform of Commons' seats occurred in three territory-specific Acts in 1867–68:- the Reform Act 1867 applied to English and Welsh constituencies
- the Representation of the People Act 1868 applied to Scottish constituencies and gave Scotland an additional quota of seats
- the Representation of the People Act 1868 applied to Irish constituencies.
By the 1880s, continued industrial growth and resulting population movements had resulted in an increased imbalance between the constituencies in terms of the numbers of MPs and the population.
The Third Reform Bill
, leading a Liberal government, introduced a Representation of the People Bill in 1884, which sought to greatly extend the franchise but not to alter the boundaries of constituencies. The Liberals had a large majority in the House of Commons, and the measure passed through the House easily. The House of Lords, on the other hand, was dominated by the Conservative Party. The Conservative leader, Lord Salisbury, was opposed to the bill. The majority of the Conservative party's MPs were elected by the counties, with the Liberals being electorally strong in the boroughs. He realised that the bill's extension of household suffrage into the counties would enfranchise many rural voters such as coalminers and agricultural labourers who were likely to vote for the Liberals. This, he claimed, would lead to "the absolute effacement of the Conservative Party". Salisbury hoped to use the Conservative majority in the Lords to block the bill and force Gladstone to seek a dissolution of Parliament before the reforms could be enacted. The Lords duly rejected the bill and returned it to the Commons, provoking outrage among the Radical wing of the Liberals. A campaign organised around the slogan "The Peers Against the People" called for reform or abolition of the Lords if they rejected the bill a second time.The "Arlington Street Compact"
During October 1884 Queen Victoria intervened in what was rapidly becoming a constitutional crisis, urging the party leaders to meet and break the deadlock. Negotiations duly started at Salisbury's London home in Arlington Street, Westminster, between the Conservative leader and Sir Charles Dilke, a member of Gladstone's cabinet. Lord Salisbury agreed to allow the reform bill to pass on condition that a bill to redistribute parliamentary seats was also enacted; the two parties reached an agreement, the "Arlington Street Compact", whereby the bulk of MPs would be elected in single-member constituencies. He calculated that this would minimise the adverse effect on the Conservatives of the extension of the vote: dividing the counties would allow Liberal-voting and Conservative-voting districts to be separated. The division of boroughs would allow the suburban areas of towns to be represented separately from the inner cities, allowing the growth of "Villa Toryism". Dilke, a member of the Radical wing of the Liberal Party, also favoured the division of boroughs to weaken the influence of the Whig faction in the party. Before 1885 many existing two-member boroughs one Whig and one Radical were nominated by agreement, often leading to uncontested elections.The Boundary Commissions
Three boundary commissions were appointed in late 1884, one for England and Wales, one for Scotland and one for Ireland. Each commission was given similar instructions.In dividing the counties they were to use Ordnance Survey maps and other documents in order to determine the boundaries of divisions. In doing so they were to ensure that each division of a county was to have an equal population "so far as practicable". In addition they were instructed "in all those cases where there are populous localities of an urban character to include them in one and the same division, unless this cannot be done without grave inconvenience, and involving boundaries of a very irregular and objectionable character". Subject to these rules, the divisions were to be as compact as possible and should be based on "well known local areas" such as petty sessional divisions or other aggregations of parishes. If necessary, an individual parish or parishes could be added to existing areas in order to equalise population, but under no circumstances was a parish to be divided. The county divisions were to be named after an "important town or place" within it, "preference being given to any merged borough or boroughs, or when it consists mainly of a well-known area, from that area". When the commissioners had devised a scheme of divisions for a county the details were to be advertised in the local press. A date would then be announced when one of the commissioners would attend at "a principal town" in the county to hear objections or proposed alterations.
The procedure for boroughs was similar. Firstly the commissioners were to determine whether the present boundaries, or the boundaries proposed in the bill, embraced "the whole of the population which ought to be included within the borough". They could decide if an area formed a "community of interest" with the town and should be included within the borough boundaries. Where suburban areas had a sufficiently large population and distinct identity they might form a county division rather than be included in the borough. If boroughs were extended, existing "well-established" boundaries were to be used if possible. Where boroughs were to be divided, the population of each division was to be approximately equal, and "special regard" was to be had to the "pursuits of the population". This was clearly understood as meaning that working class and middle class parts of towns were to be separated where possible.
Passage through parliament
The Bill was introduced to the House of Commons by the Prime Minister William Gladstone on 1 December 1884. The Bill was seen as a compromise measure, and did not include proportional representation. This led to unrest among the Liberals. Leonard Courteney, Financial Secretary to the Treasury, felt forced to resign his post and the party whip. Gladstone had held a meeting with Liberal MPs earlier in the day at the Foreign Office, where he defended the bill. He stated that far from being a compromise it was very much a government bill, and that the discussions with the opposition had been conducted with "no party bias". The bill received its second reading on 4 December 1884, and was then sent forward to the committee stage, which was to commence on 19 February 1885. The delay was to allow the boundary commissions to complete their work, with the boundaries and names of the new constituencies to be included as the schedules of the final Act.In committee few changes were made to the boundaries recommended by the commissioners. However the committee felt that the proposed names for many of the divisions were unfamiliar, and preferred to use what they termed "geographical" names incorporating a compass point. A compromise was made where both were incorporated in the names of many of the constituencies: thus the seat officially called the "Northern or Biggleswade Division of Bedfordshire" was informally referred to as "Biggleswade", the "Biggleswade Division", "Northern Bedfordshire" or "North Bedfordshire".
The act received Royal Assent on 25 June, and the provisions of both the redistribution and representation acts first came into use at the 1885 general election.
Provisions
The Committee's work coupled with the Arlington Street Compact resulted a major redistribution under the Act as follows:- Parliamentary boroughs :
- *All these units with a population of 15,000 or less ceased to have separate representation and were merged into a wider division of their county — namely 79 constituencies were disenfranchised.
- *Six other boroughs were also merged into the county divisions: four that included large extents of countryside and two that had been disenfranchised for corruption.
- *Those with populations between 15,000 and 50,000 were to have their representation reduced from two MPs to one, namely 76 constituencies.
- *Those with populations of more than 50,000 continued to be a set of two-member constituencies
- *The City of London would have its representation reduced to two MPs and remain undivided
- *The Universities of Oxford, Cambridge, and Dublin. would return two MPs
- Two low-population English counties lost an MP: Rutland was reduced to one MP and Herefordshire to two MPs.
- The number of seats in the Commons was increased from 652 to 670, inclusive of Ireland.
The number of seats had been fixed at 658 in the 1832 and 1867/8 legislation, but two two-member boroughs and two single-member boroughs had been disenfranchised for corruption.
Consequences
Cessation of dual-MP constituency pacts and majority-minority appeal
The reduction in the number of two-member constituencies ended cross-party cooperation: before the Act, in many counties and boroughs the two main parties had agreed to nominate one candidate each, and no election was held. Contested elections became the norm after the Act: 657 of 670 seats were contested at the 1885 general election.Recognition of the middle and working classes
The division of former two-member constituencies had a direct, clear consequence: it hastened the decline of the domination of Parliament by the aristocracy. After 1885, for the first time, MPs connected to industry and commerce outnumbered those closely related to the gentry. The Lords immediately stood out therefore as non-representative of the electorate; the "household suffrage" of 1885 gave the majority of men the vote; and by the end of 1918 all those aged over 21 could vote and some women.Nonetheless the Lords and their sons, grandsons and nephews in the Commons continued to form the greater part of the Cabinet until the Asquith ministry — further, the Lords legally bore equal strength, save for their inability to initiate bills spending public funds since 1407, until Asquith's constitutional Parliament Act 1911. The Lords could veto bills and propose most types of bills.
Electoral results and impact on strategy and attitudes
Immediate expansion of the working class electorate caused the number of 'Lib/Lab' MPs to rise from 2 in 1874 to 13 in 1885. The Act's new seats saw a 1% single-party swing to the Conservatives and so a gain of only 10 seats and a similar gain of 11 seats by Independent Liberals, the latter often slightly more radical than both mainstream parties.The sudden balance of power of the seats held or won by Irish Parliamentary Party candidates galvanised those opposed to Home Rule. This third party power of veto coupled with the end of local electoral pacts in a foreseeable way; Disraeli and Gladstone needed central control of their members to pursue narrower narratives and promote differing values. The IPP were often labelled particularly by the media and Conservatives as 'Parnellites'. Their power saw Gladstone make Home Rule his touchstone but, in so doing, distance his party from most peers who, until the House of Lords was flooded with Liberal peers in 1911, preferred conservative policies and guarded their near-equal power. Peers of the Whig persuasion flocked to a conservative line given immediate loss of family ties in the Commons and tide of reformist policies engulfing the Liberal party caused by the Act's generous franchise and loss of their coveted and often sponsored Whig-Radical and Whig-Conservative dual-member seats in the Commons. In short most peers felt change had gone far and fast enough. The opening words of free thought of the Lords, in its reply to the Queen's Speech came from the Duke of Abercorn who said:-
Liberal MPs opposing Home Rule rapidly formed a new party to stand at the next election in 1886, the Liberal Unionists who were willing to govern with Conservatives.
Liberals were unable to rely on any Lords' majorities on their Bills from 1885 until the Parliament Act 1911. The 1911 Act ended the equal power of the House of Lords forever, constitutionally.
132 small areas were merged with part or all of their surrounding county constituency, all of which had previously returned two members. Courted for decades with the promise of for social change, religious freedom and free trade by Liberals, often served by a Radical-leaning alongside and a Whig-leaning MP, these boroughs had few Conservative MPs at most elections. Their substitute single-member seats where gaining suburban and wealthy rural parts particularly assisted the Conservative party, which took a position of national "strength and unity" in opposing Chamberlain's "radicalism" preferring instead education reform and opposing Gladstone's Home Rule "crusade" in favour of budgetary concessions and support for unionist Irish businesses. The ensuing Queens Speech showed the Queen was "...resolutely opposed ...convinced that I shall be heartily supported by my Parliament and my people."
The Conservative party thinkers and leaders in both houses had now enfranchised the majority of men trusting them to break the deadlock in their favour; in return they had espoused religious freedom and almost completely free trade. The Liberal Party may have won the 1885 General Election however the new Lords heavy antipathy and the Irish question tore the party apart.
The majority of multi-member seats saw cooperation before 1885 whereas under the new one-MP-per-constituency norm, cooperation as patron and protégé or to attract opposing voters was futile. Whig and the most progressive Radical candidates could now be branded "weak", "divided" or "distanced" from the line of Gladstone and his successors which proved a flaw in the broad congregation of the Liberal Party until the formation of the final splinter group of 1931. Conservatives depicted Gladstone's dogged advancement of Home Rule, notably his failed first and second Irish Home Rule bills in 1886 and 1893, an open dissent from Her Majesty, as the root cause of Liberal Party disintegration. This unorthodoxy combined with heavy defeats on other Commons bills in the House of Lords which began to hemorrhage more Whigs led to electoral landslide victories for the Conservative party in 1886 and 1895 to break the deadlock.
Redistributed seats: England
Bedfordshire
Representation decreased from 4 to 3 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Berkshire
Representation decreased from 8 to 5 MPs‡ The Borough of Abingdon was partly in Oxfordshire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!change!!After 1885
Buckinghamshire
Representation decreased from 8 to 3 MPs‡ The Borough of Great Marlow was partly in Berkshire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
The Buckingham Division absorbed Buckingham and the Wycombe Division absorbed Chipping Wycombe.
Cambridgeshire
Representation decreased from 5 to 4 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Cheshire
Representation decreased from 14 to 13 MPs‡ The Boroughs of Stalybridge and Stockport were partly in Lancashire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
- The East Division formed the basis of the new Macclesfield Division
- The Mid Division was divided into the new Altrincham, Hyde and Knutsford Divisions
- The South Division was divided into the new Eddisbury and Wirral Divisions.
Cornwall
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
- The Eastern Division was divided into the new North-Eastern and South-Eastern Divisions
- The Western Division was divided into the new North-Western, Truro and Western Divisions
Cumberland
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Derbyshire
Representation increased from 8 to 9 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Devon
Representation decreased from 17 to 13 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Dorset
Representation decreased from 10 to 4 MPs‡ The Borough of Shaftesbury was partly in Wiltshire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Durham
Representation increased from 13 to 16 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Essex
Representation increased from 10 to 11 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Gloucestershire
Representation decreased from 13 to 11 MPs‡ The Borough of Bristol was partly in Somerset
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Hampshire and Isle of Wight
Representation decreased from 16 to 12 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Herefordshire
Representation decreased from 6 to 3 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Hertfordshire
Representation remained at 4 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Huntingdonshire
Representation decreased from 3 to 2 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Kent
Representation decreased from 21 to 19 MPs† Formed part of "The Metropolis" of London
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Lancashire
Representation increased from 32 to 57 MPs‡ The Borough of Warrington was partly in Cheshire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Blackpool Division
Leicestershire
Representation remained at 6 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Lincolnshire
Representation decreased from 14 to 11 MPs‡ The Borough of Stamford was partly in Northamptonshire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
North Kesteven Division
Middlesex
Representation increased from 18 to 47 MPs† Formed part of "The Metropolis" of London
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Norfolk
Representation unchanged‡ The Borough of Great Yarmouth was partly in Suffolk
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Northamptonshire
Representation decreased from 8 to 7 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Northumberland
Representation decreased from 10 to 8 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Nottinghamshire
Representation decreased from 10 to 7 MPs‡ The Borough of East Retford was partly in the West Riding of Yorkshire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Oxfordshire
Representation decreased from 7 to 4 MPs‡ The Borough of Banbury was partly in Northamptonshire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Rutland
Representation reduced from 2 MPs to 1!colspan=3| Parliamentary County
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Shropshire
Representation decreased from 10 to 5 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Somerset
Representation decreased from 11 to 10 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Staffordshire
Representation decreased from 19 to 17 MPs‡ The Borough of Tamworth was partly in Warwickshire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Suffolk
Representation decreased from 9 to 8 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Surrey
Representation increased from 11 to 22 MPs† Formed part of "The Metropolis" of London
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Sussex
Representation decreased from 15 to 9 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Warwickshire
Representation increased from 11 to 14 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Westmorland
Representation decreased from 3 to 2 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Wiltshire
Representation decreased from 15 to 6 MPs‡ The Borough of Cricklade was partly in Gloucestershire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Worcestershire
Representation decreased from 11 to 8 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Yorkshire
Representation increased from 38 to 52 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Universities
University representation was not altered by the act.!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Redistributed seats: Wales
Anglesey
Representation decreased from 2 to 1 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Breconshire
Representation decreased from 2 to 1 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Cardiganshire
Representation decreased from 2 to 1 MPs‡ The Borough of Cardigan was partly in Pembrokeshire, the Boroughs of Adpar and Lampeter were partly in Carmarthenshire
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Carmarthenshire
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Carnarvonshire
Representation increased from 2 to 3 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Denbighshire
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Flintshire
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Glamorganshire
Representation increased from 6 to 10 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Merionethshire
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Monmouthshire
Representation increased from 3 to 4 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Montgomeryshire
''Representation unchanged!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Pembrokeshire
Representation decreased from 3 to 2 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Radnorshire
Representation decreased from 2 to 1 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Redistributed seats: Scotland
Burghs and Districts of Burghs
!colspan=3| Burghs and Districts!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Comprised five parliamentary burghs: Ayr and Irvine in Ayrshire, and Campbeltown, Inverary and Oban in Argyllshire.
Comprised five parliamentary burghs: Annan Lochmaben and Sanquhar in Dumfriesshire, Dumfries in Dumfriesshire and Kirkcudbrightshire, Kirkcudbright in Kirkcudbrightshire.
Comprised five parliamentary burghs: Inverurie, Kintore and Peterhead in Aberdeenshire, Banff and Cullen in Banffshire, and Elgin in Elginshire.
Boundaries widened to include entire municipal burgh of Hamilton.
Boundaries extended to include entire municipal burgh of Hawick.
Comprised four parliamentary burghs: Forres in Elginshire, Inverness in Inverness-shire, Nairn in Nairnshire and Fortrose in Ross and Cromarty.
Comprised three burghs in the County of Edinburgh: Leith, Musselburgh and Portobello.
Comprised five burghs: Arbroath, Brechin, Forfar and Montrose in Forfarshire and Inverbervie in Kincardineshire.
Comprised seven burghs in Fife: Anstruther Easter, Anstruther Wester, Crail, Cupar, Kilrenny, Pittenweem and St Andrews.
Comprised five burghs: Dunfermline and Inverkeithing in Fife; Queensferry in Linlithgowshire; Culross in Perthshire and Stirling in Stirlingshire.
Comprised six burghs: Wick in Caithness; Kirkwall in Orkney; Cromarty, Dingwall and Tain in Ross and Cromarty; Dornoch in Sutherland.
Aberdeenshire
Representation unchangedSee also the parliamentary burgh of Aberdeen and the Elgin District of Burghs which included Peterhead.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Argyllshire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burghs in the county formed part of the Ayr District.
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Ayrshire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burghs in the county formed parts of Ayr and Kilmarnock Districts.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Banffshire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burghs in the county formed part of the Elgin District.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Berwickshire
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Buteshire
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Caithness
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burgh in the county formed part of the Wick District
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Clackmannanshire and Kinross-shire
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
The constituency consisted of the combined parliamentary counties of Clackmannanshire and Kinross-shire, and also included the parishes of Tulliallan, Culross and Muckhart in Perthshire, the Perthshire portions of the parishes of Logie and Fossaway, and the Stirlingshire part of the parish of Alva.
Dumfriesshire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burghs in the county formed part of the Dumfries District
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Dumbartonshire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burgh of Dumbarton formed part of Kilmarnock District
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
County of Edinburgh
Representation unchangedSee also the parliamentary burgh of Edinburgh and the Leith District of Burghs.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Elginshire and Nairnshire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burgh of Elgin formed part of Elgin District; the burghs of Forres and Nairn were part of Inverness District.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Fife
Representation increased from 1 to 2 MPsThe 13 parliamentary burghs in the county formed the Kirkcaldy District, the St Andrews District and part of the Stirling District.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Forfarshire
Representation unchangedSee also the parliamentary burgh of Dundee and the Montrose District of Burghs.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Haddingtonshire
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Inverness-shire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burgh of Inverness formed part of the Inverness District of Burghs.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Kincardineshire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burgh of Montrose formed part of the Montrose District of Burghs.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Kirkcudbrightshire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burgh of Kirkcudbright and the burgh of Dumfries formed part of Dumfries District.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Lanarkshire
Representation increased from 2 to 6 MPsSee also the parliamentary burgh of Glasgow, the Falkirk District of Burghs which included three Lanarkshire burghs and the Kilmarnock District of Burghs which included the burgh of Rutherglen.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Linlithgowshire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burgh of Linlithgow formed part of Fakirk District and the burgh of Queensferry formed part of Stirling District.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Orkney and Shetland
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burgh of Kirkwall formed part of Wick District.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Peeblesshire and Selkirkshire
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burghs of Galashiels and Selkirk formed part of the Hawick District
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Perthshire
Representation increased from 1 to 2 MPsSee also the parliamentary burghs of Perth City and Culross. Detached parts of the county formed part of the Clackmannanshire and Kinross-shire constituency.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Renfrewshire
Representation increased from 1 to 2 MPsSee also the parliamentary burghs of Greenock and Paisley; and two burghs in the Kilmarnock District: Port Glasgow and Renfrew. Part of the parliamentary burgh of Glasgow was in Renfrewshire.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Ross and Cromarty
Representation unchangedParliamentary burghs of Cromarty, Dingwall and Tain formed part of the Dingwall District; the burgh of Fortrose was part of the Inverness District.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Roxburghshire
Representation unchangedParliamentary burgh of Hawick formed part of the Hawick District.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Stirlingshire
Representation unchangedParliamentary burgh of Falkirk formed part of the Falkirk District; burgh of Stirling was part of Stirling District. The Stirlingshire portion of the parish of Alva formed of the Clackmannanshire and Kinross-shire constituency.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Sutherland
Representation unchangedThe parliamentary burgh of Dornoch formed part of the Wick District.
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Wigtownshire
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Universities
Redistributed seats: Ireland
Antrim
Representation increased from 6 to 8 MPs‡ The parliamentary boroughs of Belfast and Lisburn were partly in County Down
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Armagh
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Carlow
Representation decreased from 3 MPs to 1.‡ Part of the borough of Carlow was in Queen's County
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Cavan
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Clare
Representation decreased from 3 to 2 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Cork
Representation increased from 8 to 9 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Donegal
''Representation increased from 2 to 4 MPs!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Down
Representation increased from 4 to 5 MPs‡ The Borough of Newry was partly in County Armagh.
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Dublin
Representation increased from 4 to 6 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Fermanagh
Representation reduced from 3 to 2 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Galway
Representation increased from 4 to 5 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Kerry
Representation increased from 3 to 4 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Kildare
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Kilkenny
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
King's County
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Leitrim
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Limerick
Representation reduced from 4 to 3 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Londonderry
Representation reduced from 4 to 3 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Longford
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Louth
Representation reduced from 4 to 2 MPs‡ The parliamentary borough of Drogheda lay partly in County Meath.
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Mayo
Representation increased from 2 to 4 MPs!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Meath
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Monaghan
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Queen's County
Representation reduced from 3 MPs to 2.‡ The parliamentary borough of Portarlington was partly in King's County
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Roscommon
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Sligo
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Tipperary
Representation increased from 3 MPs to 4.‡ The parliamentary borough of Clonmel was partly in County Waterford
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Tyrone
Representation increased from 3 MPs to 4.!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Waterford
Representation reduced from 5 to 3 MPs!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Westmeath
Representation reduced from 3 to 2 MPs‡ The parliamentary borough of Athlone was partly in County Roscommon.
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Wexford
Representation reduced from 4 to 2 MPs‡ The parliamentary borough of New Ross was partly in County Kilkenny.
!colspan=3| Boroughs
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885
Wicklow
Representation unchanged!colspan=3| County Divisions
!Before 1885!!Change!!After 1885