Sarcopterygii
The Sarcopterygii or lobe-finned fish —sometimes considered synonymous with Crossopterygii —constitute a clade of the bony fish. A strict cladistic view shows that some Sarcopterygii evolved into the tetrapods, a superclass including amphibians, reptiles, and mammals.
The living non-tetrapod sarcopterygians include two species of coelacanths and six species of lungfish.
Characteristics
Early lobe-finned fishes are bony fish with fleshy, lobed, paired fins, which are joined to the body by a single bone. The fins of lobe-finned fishes differ from those of all other fish in that each is borne on a fleshy, lobelike, scaly stalk extending from the body. The scales of sarcopterygians are true scaloids, consisting of lamellar bone surrounded by layers of vascular bone, dentine-like cosmine, and external keratin. The morphology of tetrapodomorphs, fish that are similar-looking to tetrapods, give indications of the transition from water to terrestrial life. Pectoral and pelvic fins have articulations resembling those of tetrapod limbs. These fins evolved into the legs of the first tetrapod land vertebrates, amphibians. They also possess two dorsal fins with separate bases, as opposed to the single dorsal fin of actinopterygians. The braincase of sarcopterygians primitively has a hinge line, but this is lost in tetrapods and lungfish. Many early sarcopterygians have a symmetrical tail. All sarcopterygians possess teeth covered with true enamel.Most species of lobe-finned fishes are extinct. The largest known lobe-finned fish was Rhizodus hibberti from the Carboniferous period of Scotland which may have exceeded 7 meters in length. Among the two groups of extant species, the coelacanths and the lungfishes, the largest species is the West Indian Ocean coelacanth, reaching in length and weighing up. The largest lungfish is the African lungfish which can reach 2 m in length and weigh up to.
Classification
Taxonomists who subscribe to the cladistic approach include the grouping Tetrapoda within this group, which in turn consists of all species of four-limbed vertebrates. The fin-limbs of lobe-finned fishes such as the coelacanths show a strong similarity to the expected ancestral form of tetrapod limbs. The lobe-finned fishes apparently followed two different lines of development and are accordingly separated into two subclasses, the Rhipidistia and the Actinistia.Taxonomy
The classification below follows Benton 2004, and uses a synthesis of rank-based Linnaean taxonomy and also reflects evolutionary relationships. Benton included the Superclass Tetrapoda in the Subclass Sarcopterygii in order to reflect the direct descent of tetrapods from lobe-finned fish, despite the former being assigned a higher taxonomic rank.Actinistia | Actinistia, coelacanths, are a subclass of mostly fossil lobe-finned fishes. This subclass contains the coelacanths, including the two living coelacanths, the West Indian Ocean coelacanth and the Indonesian coelacanth. | |
Dipnoi | Dipnoi, lungfish, also known as salamanderfish, are a subclass of freshwater fish. Lungfish are best known for retaining characteristics primitive within the bony fishes, including the ability to breathe air, and structures primitive within the lobe-finned fishes, including the presence of lobed fins with a well-developed internal skeleton. Today, lungfish live only in Africa, South America, and Australia. While vicariance would suggest this represents an ancient distribution limited to the Mesozoic supercontinent Gondwana, the fossil record suggests advanced lungfish had a widespread freshwater distribution and the current distribution of modern lungfish species reflects extinction of many lineages following the breakup of Pangaea, Gondwana, and Laurasia. | |
Tetrapodomorpha | Tetrapodomorpha, tetrapods and their extinct relatives, are a clade of vertebrates consisting of tetrapods and their closest sarcopterygian relatives that are more closely related to living tetrapods than to living lungfish. Advanced forms transitional between fish and the early labyrinthodonts, like Tiktaalik, have been referred to as "fishapods" by their discoverers, being half-fish, half-tetrapods, in appearance and limb morphology. The Tetrapodomorpha contain the crown group tetrapods and several groups of early stem tetrapods, and several groups of related lobe-finned fishes, collectively known as the osteolepiforms. The Tetrapodamorpha minus the crown group Tetrapoda are the stem tetrapoda, a paraphyletic unit encompassing the fish to tetrapod transition. Among the characters defining tetrapodomorphs are modifications to the fins, notably a humerus with convex head articulating with the glenoid fossa. Tetrapodomorph fossils are known from the early Devonian onwards, and include Osteolepis, Panderichthys, Kenichthys, and Tungsenia. |
- Subclass Sarcopterygii
- * †Order Onychodontida
- * Order Actinistia
- * Infraclass Dipnomorpha
- ** †Order Porolepiformes
- ** Subclass Dipnoi
- *** Order Ceratodontiformes
- *** Order Lepidosireniformes
- * Infraclass Tetrapodomorpha
- ** †Order Rhizodontida
- ** Superorder Osteolepidida
- *** †Order Osteolepiformes
- **** †Family Tristichopteridae
- *** †Order Panderichthyida
- *** Superclass Tetrapoda
Phylogeny
|upright
- Sarcopterygii incertae sedis
- *†Guiyu oneiros Zhu et al., 2009
- *†Diabolepis speratus
- *†Langdenia campylognatha Janvier & Phuong, 1999
- *†Ligulalepis Schultze, 1968
- *†Meemannia eos Zhu, Yu, Wang, Zhao & Jia, 2006
- *†Psarolepis romeri Yu 1998 sensu Zhu, Yu, Wang, Zhao & Jia, 2006
- *†Megamastax ambylodus Choo, Zhu, Zhao, Jia, & Zhu, 2014
- *†Sparalepis tingi Choo,Zhu,Qu,Yu,Jia & Zhaoh, 2017
- Paraphyletic Osteolepida incertae sedis :
- *†Bogdanovia orientalis Obrucheva 1955
- *†Canningius groenlandicus Säve-Söderbergh, 1937
- *†Chrysolepis
- *†Geiserolepis
- *†Latvius
- **†L. grewingki
- **†L. porosus Jarvik, 1948
- **†L. obrutus Vorobyeva, 1977
- *†Lohsania utahensis Vaughn, 1962
- *†Megadonichthys kurikae Vorobyeva, 1962
- *†Platyethmoidia antarctica Young, Long & Ritchie, 1992
- *†Shirolepis ananjevi Vorobeva, 1977
- *†Sterropterygion brandei Thomson, 1972
- *†Thaumatolepis edelsteini Obruchev, 1941
- *†Thysanolepis micans Vorobyeva, 1977
- *†Vorobjevaia dolonodon Young, Long & Ritchie, 1992
- Paraphyletic Elpistostegalia/Panderichthyida incertae sedis
- *†Parapanderichthys stolbovi Vorobyeva, 1992
- *†Howittichthys warrenae Long & Holland, 2008
- *†Livoniana multidentata Ahlberg, Luksevic & Mark-Kurik, 2000
- Stegocephalia incertae sedis
- *†Antlerpeton clarkii Thomson, Shubin & Poole, 1998
- *†Austrobrachyops jenseni Colbert & Cosgriff, 1974
- *†Broilisaurus raniceps Kuhn, 1938
- *†Densignathus rowei Daeschler, 2000
- *†Doragnathus woodi Smithson, 1980
- *†Jakubsonia livnensis Lebedev, 2004
- *†Limnerpeton dubium Fritsch, 1901
- *†Limnosceloides Romer, 1952
- **†L. dunkardensis Romer, 1952
- **†L. brahycoles Langston, 1966
- *†Occidens portlocki Clack & Ahlberg, 2004
- *†Ossinodus puerorum emend Warren & Turner, 2004
- *†Romeriscus periallus Baird & Carroll, 1968
- *†Sigournea multidentata Bolt & Lombard, 2006
- *†Sinostega pani Zhu et al., 2002
- *†Ymeria denticulata Clack et al., 2012
Evolution
In the Early Devonian, the sarcopterygians split into two main lineages: the coelacanths and the rhipidistians. Coelacanths never left the oceans and their heyday was the late Devonian and Carboniferous, from 385 to 299 Ma, as they were more common during those periods than in any other period in the Phanerozoic; coelacanths still live today in the open oceans.
The Rhipidistians, whose ancestors probably lived in the oceans near the river mouths, left the ocean world and migrated into freshwater habitats. In turn, they split into two major groups: lungfish and the tetrapodomorphs. Lungfish radiated into their greatest diversity during the Triassic period; today fewer than a dozen genera remain. They evolved the first proto-lungs and proto-limbs, adapting to living outside a submerged water environment by the middle Devonian.
There are three major hypotheses as to how lungfish evolved their stubby fins. The traditional explanation is the "shrinking waterhole hypothesis", or "desert hypothesis", posited by the American paleontologist Alfred Romer, who believed that limbs and lungs may have evolved from the necessity of having to find new bodies of water as old waterholes dried up.
A second, the "inter-tidal hypothesis", was published by a team of Polish paleontologists—Grzegorz Niedźwiedzki, Piotr Szrek, Katarzyna Narkiewicz, Marek Narkiewicz, and Per Ahlberg—in 2010. They argued that sarcopterygians may have first emerged unto land from intertidal zones rather than inland bodies of water. Their hypothesis is based on the discovery of the 395 million-year-old Zachełmie tracks in Zachełmie, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, Poland, the oldest-ever-discovered fossil evidence of tetrapods.
The third hypothesis is dubbed the "woodland hypothesis" and was proposed by the American paleontologist Greg Retallack in 2011. He argues that limbs may have developed in shallow bodies of water in woodlands as a means of navigating in environments filled with roots and vegetation. He based his conclusions on the evidence that transitional tetrapod fossils are consistently found in habitats that were formerly humid and wooded floodplains.
A fourth, minority hypothesis posits that advancing onto land achieved more safety from predators, less competition for prey, and certain environmental advantages not found in water—such as oxygen concentration, and temperature control —implying that organisms developing limbs were also adapting to spending some of their time out of water. However, studies have found that sarcopterygians developed tetrapod-like limbs suitable for walking well before venturing onto land ; this suggests they adapted to walking on the ground-bed under water before they advanced onto dry land.
The first tetrapodomorphs, which included the gigantic rhizodonts, had the same general anatomy as the lungfish, who were their closest kin, but they appear not to have left their water habitat until the late Devonian epoch, with the appearance of tetrapods. Tetrapods are the only tetrapodomorphs which survived after the Devonian.
Non-tetrapod sarcopterygians continued until towards the end of Paleozoic era, suffering heavy losses during the Permian–Triassic extinction event.
Citations
Carroll RL, Irwin J, Green DM. 2005. Thermal physiology and the origin of terrestriality in vertebrates. Zoological Journey of the Linnean Society. 143:345–358.Hohn-Schulte, B., H. Preuschoft, U. Witzel, and C. Distler-Hoffmann. 2013. Biomechanics and functional preconditions for terrestrial lifestyle in basal tetrapods, with special consideration of Tiktaalik roseae. Historical Biology 25:167-181.
Clack JA. 2007. Devonian climate change, breathing, and the origin of the tetrapod stem group. Integrative and Comparative Biology. p. 1–14.
King, H.M., Shubin, N.H., Coates, M.I. & Hale, M.E. Behavioural evidence for the evolution of walking and bounding before terrestriality in sarcopterygian fishes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA 108: 21146–21151.
Pierce, S. E., J. A. Clack, and J. R. Hutchinson. 2012. Three-dimensional limb joint mobility in the early tetrapod Ichthyostega. Nature 486:523-U123.
Clack, J. A. 2009. The fin to limb transition: New data, interpretations, and hypotheses from paleontology and developmental biology. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 37:163-179.
Amemiya, C. T., J. Alfoldi, A. P. Lee, S. H. Fan, H. Philippe, I. MacCallum, I. Braasch et al. 2013. The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution. Nature 496:311-316.