Smart motorway


A smart motorway, also known in Scotland as an intelligent transport system, is a section of motorway that uses active traffic management techniques to increase capacity by use of variable speed limits and hard shoulder running at busy times. Benefits include smoother traffic flow, more reliable journey times, fewer road traffic collisions, and reduced noise and harmful vehicle emissions. The term controlled motorway is sometimes used for schemes that use variable speed limits without hard-shoulder running.
As of 2019, smart motorways are mainly found in Great Britain, although the concept is also becoming common in Australia and New Zealand and some parts of Switzerland.

History

The traffic management technique, including hard shoulder running, was first used in its full specification in the UK on the M42 motorway in the West Midlands in 2006. A higher speed limit of was trialled on the southbound carriageway between junctions 4 and 3A from 2008.
In 2007 plans were announced by the then secretary of state for transport, Ruth Kelly, to extend the scheme to two sections of the M6 motorway near Birmingham by 2011 at a cost of £150 million. The emergency refuges were to be extended to every on the roll out. A study into the use of ATM on the M1, M4, M20 and M25 motorways was also announced, however the Department for Transport had decided to proceed with a scheme to widen sections of the M25.
From 2013 the current term smart motorway was used by the Highways Agency to promote the technology to road users.

Contracts

A £2 billion contract was announced to extend the scheme to sections of the M1, M4, M5, M6, M60 and M62 in February 2010 with a further announcement by the new government in October 2010. The contract was awarded to four delivery partners Balfour Beatty, Carillion and joint ventures BAM Nuttall/Morgan Sindall Group and Costain Group/Serco. In January 2012, Carillion won the contract for M6 junctions 5 - 8 near Birmingham for £126 million.
In early 2018, the contracts previously awarded to Carillion were taken on by Kier, following the collapse of Carillion.

Map

The map to the right visually represents the operational and under construction elements of the UK's smart motorway system as of June 2017.

Effectiveness

In 2007 it was estimated that ATM could be introduced within two years at a cost of around £5-15 million per mile as opposed to 10 years and £79 million per mile for widening.
The M42 scheme was initially run as an experiment and a Highways Agency report into the first six months of the scheme showed a reduction in variability journey times of up to 27%. The journey time statistics can be broken down to show that northbound journey times were reduced by 26%, equating to an average reduction of 4 minute as compared to the period when the variable speed limits were on but the hard shoulder was not being used and 9% southbound during the afternoon rush hour. The report also indicated a fall in the number of accidents from over 5 a month to 1.5 per month on average. The Agency did state that normally accident statistics should be compared over a 3-year period, so the initial results should be treated with caution. They also stated that no accidents had been caused by hard shoulder use as a normal lane. The report also stated that there had been a 10% fall in pollution and 4% fall in fuel consumption. The report also indicated a compliance rate of 98% to the indicated speed limits when using the hard shoulder. For comparison before the introduction of mandatory speed limits at road works, the compliance rate was 10% as opposed to 89% afterwards, showing a similar effect.

Criticisms

The Campaign for Better Transport argued that whilst it would reduce the need for widening schemes, it did nothing to reduce traffic and CO2 emissions. Friends of the Earth criticised the scheme as "widening on the cheap" and also pointed to a possible increase in vehicle emissions. Highways England argue that ATM reduces the environmental impact in regards to widening as it is carried out within the existing boundaries of the motorway as well as a possible improvement in local air quality due to smoother traffic flow.
The RAC cited a study in the Netherlands that showed drivers using the hard shoulder when they were not permitted, increasing the risk of a collision for vehicles stopped. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents also expressed concern that emergency services would take longer to reach an incident. The Highways Agency rejected this concern based on the of dual carriageway that does not have a hard shoulder. Disability groups were concerned that some drivers would not be able to access the emergency phones or even exit their vehicles, leaving them at increased risk. Ruth Kelly, former Secretary of State for Transport stated that these schemes were useful, but that motorway widening would still be considered where it was appropriate.
The scheme has attracted criticism from motoring organisations such as the AA, who in 2018 reported that many members were concerned that speed limits were being imposed without good cause in situations where traffic was light. In response, Highways England stated that they had "started a comprehensive review of how variable speed limits are set, including the amount of time they are visible to drivers".
A campaign "Smart Motorways Kill" was set up in 2019 after the death of Jason Mercer and Alexandru Murgeanu on the M1 northbound near junction 34. They were killed by a heavy goods vehicle after they had pulled over after a minor accident on this "Smart Motorway" section.
In January 2020, it was announced that a review was planned after freedom of information requests showed that near misses had increased up to 20-fold, and that 38 people had died. The emergency refuge areas were placed apart on the M42 pilot scheme, but can be apart on stretches of the M25. Only 9% of drivers feel safe while using smart motorways. Some of the extra capacity is negated by drivers terrified to drive on the inside lane and not using them.
A BBC Panorama aired on 27 January 2020 accused smart motorways of being responsible for multiple deaths in the UK.
On 28 January 2020 Police Federation of England and Wales chief, reported The Times newspaper, John Apter said he did not "like the term 'smart motorways' because it infers they’re a good idea. They’re anything but" and "a recipe for disaster. It’s a death trap. It’s inherently dangerous and putting lives at risk."
In January 2020, all Smart Motorways were put under review to address safety concerns and determine an action plan. No new Smart Motorways would open until this review was published. On the 12th March 2020, the review and action plan was published. It stated changes to the standards for new smart motorways such as a reduction from upto 1.5 miles to 1 mile between Emergency refuge areas and Stranded vehicle detection radars to be installed as part of the project. Other actions it required to be taken is for all Dynamic Hard Shoulder Motorways to be converted into All-Lane-Running by March 2025, Stranded Vehicle Detection radars to be installed on all Smart Motorways within 36 months & a potential national programme to install more ERAs on current smart motorways.

Signage

Early systems used dot matrix signs on gantries to display short text messages, with smaller variable signs above each lane and to the sides of the carriageway. Current smart motorway systems often use the "MS4" sign type which can include pictograms from the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions.
In 2017, Highways England trialled a new type of emergency area on the M3 that would be more visibly obvious to motorists. A new sign accompanied the trial which is similar in design to European emergency area signs. These changes have subsequently been trialled on the M5 and M25 with the signs being authorised by the Department for Transport for further use.

Operation and variants

, the South Wales Trunk Road Agent, Transport NI and Transport Scotland are responsible for the construction and maintenance of smart motorways in their respective countries.

Controlled motorway

Variable speed limits with the hard shoulder operating as it would on a conventional motorway. They have most often been installed where a motorway has previously been widened but with a discontinuous hard shoulder to incorporate existing bridges, therefore using the hard shoulder as a running lane is ruled out. Existing gantries are upgraded to support signals capable of displaying a mandatory speed limit and speed cameras.

Locations

;Notes

Dynamic hard shoulder

Variable speed limits with the hard shoulder selectively opened as a running lane during periods when traffic levels are too high for only three lanes of running traffic. When activated, vehicles can use the hard shoulder as a running lane. All lanes are limited to a maximum of 60 mph, but these can be lowered further. Studies have shown that many users struggle to understand the complex signs and signals, which gave rise to plans in the mid-to-late 2020s to change the dynamic hard shoulder into a permanent running lane, thereby making these schemes [|all lane running].

Locations

Variable speed limits with the hard shoulder removed and converted to a permanent running lane.

Locations

Isolated stretches on a smart motorway where the hard shoulder becomes a permanent running lane through a junction and immediately surrounding the slip roads.

Locations

The following schemes are under construction:

To begin construction before 2020 (RIS1)

1995

2001

2005

2009

Statutory instruments

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*