Synchronized skating


Synchronized skating is a gender neutral sport where between eight and twenty figure skaters perform together as a team. They move as a flowing unit at high speed over the ice, while completing complicated footwork and elements. This complex sport was originated in 1956 was first called "precision skating," because of the emphasis on maintaining precise formations and timing of the group. Synchronized skating's popularity has grow immensely over the past 40 years and has been quickly embraced by several European countries who have produced teams that dominate international championships year after year. Today there are more than 600 synchro teams in the United States alone.

Details

Similar to any other discipline of figure skating, there are many different levels in US Figure Skating at which synchronized skaters can compete. These levels include: Snowplow Sam Synchro, Synchro Skills 1, 2, and 3, Preliminary, Pre-juvenile, Open Juvenile, Juvenile, Intermediate, Novice, Junior, Senior, Open Collegiate, Collegiate, Adult, Open Adult, Open Masters, and Masters. Synchronized skating uses a similar judging system as singles, pairs and ice dancing. The discipline is primarily judged on skating skills, transitions, performance, composition, interpretation and difficulty of elements. What makes the sport so unique is the incredible teamwork, speed, and intricate formations.
Each level performs a free-skate program that requires elements such as circles, lines, blocks, wheels, intersections, no holds, and, at higher levels, lifts. Teams are required to perform step sequences, ranging in difficulty with each level. In the highest ranking levels, Junior and Senior division teams are required to perform the free-skate, also known as long program, as well as a short program. Generally, the short program is more technical in nature, where the free skating program is longer and provides an opportunity to showcase expression, emotion and interpretation.
The different levels are permitted to compete at different competitions. Synchro Skills levels can compete at any U.S. Figure Skating synchronized skating non-qualifying competition or a Learn to Skate USA competition. Preliminary, pre-juvenile, open-juvenile, open-collegiate and open-adult can compete at the same competitions as well the Eastern, Midwestern or Pacific Coast Synchronized Skating Sectional Championships. Teams at the juvenile, intermediate, novice, junior, senior, collegiate, adult or masters are permitted to compete at all competitions listed above. However, at their respective sectional championship a placement in the top four earns them a spot at the U.S. Synchronized Skating Championships. Junior level teams compete in a world qualifying competition where the top two teams attend the Junior World Synchronized Skating Championships. At the senior level, teams compete at nationals for a spot at the World Synchronized Skating Championships, the top two teams attend.
As stated above, a synchronized skating routine may consist of straight line sequences, wheels, blocks, circle step sequences, or also moves in isolation. Moves in isolation, used in more advanced levels, consist of one or more skaters separating from the rest of the team to performs freestyle type moves. For example, three figure-skaters may separate and go into sit spins, while the rest of the team is in a circle formation. The three figure skaters will then join the group again and carry on with the routine. Similarly, Novice, Junior, and Senior programs include moves in the fields. This is where the whole team performs moves such as bellman spirals, 170 spirals, unsupported spirals, spread eagles, or bauers connected.

Required elements''''''

'''Block'''

This is an element where the figure skaters are lined up in at least three parallel lines. Five lines is the maximum a block can have. The block should travel over the entire ice surface. The lines should be straight and evenly spaced. To increase the difficulty of the block teams can add step sequences, pivot the block, or change the configuration.

'''Circle'''

There are many different ways to complete this element. Teams can have one circle, multiple circles, a circle within a circle, interlocked circles, or a disconnected circle. The circle should be evenly spaced between the skaters and should form a round shape. To increase the difficulty of a circle a team can include step sequences, traveling, and changes of rotational direction. Assisting of travel can also be present in a circle, and is usually noted by a skater trying to cut through the rotation of the circle on a straight path; this will be noticeable with the same jerky/whipping motion of the circle.

'''Line'''

There are many different types of lines. Lines can be two parallel lines, one straight line, or a diagonal line. To increase the difficulty the team may pivot the line, change configuration, or incorporate retrogression into the line.

'''Wheel'''

For a wheel every figure skater must rotate around a common center point. There are many different formations that teams can form including a two to five spoke or a parallel wheel. Each spoke of the wheel should be straight and the figure skaters should be leaning into the center of the wheel. The difficulty of the wheel can be increased by adding footwork, changing the rotational direction of the wheel, configuration of the wheel, or traveling. Traveling is difficult because a lot of the time teams will get called for "assisting the travel" which occurs when a team member a team member will look out of place and b) the wheel will whip or be very jerky in movement.

'''Intersection'''

An intersection, also known as a pass through, is when the figure skaters skate towards each other in lines and intersect. The intersection can be two lines, such as an angled intersection, but can have three or four lines, such as a triangle or box. At the point of intersection skaters could do turns or free skating movements to increase the difficulty. The entry to the intersection can be made more difficult by intersecting from an angle or from a whip.

'''No Hold Element'''

The no hold element has the same qualities as a regular block. The only difference is that the skaters are not connected in a no hold block. The goal of this maneuver is to stay in perfect alignment while doing the footwork. The neater the block and the harder the footwork, the more points a team can receive.

'''Pairs Element'''

This is a free skating move where one figure skater holds on to another. Different types of pairs element include spins, lifts, and pivots such as death spirals. Again, this element is really not a necessity for team skating, but it is seen at the Junior and Senior level. A pairs element can be used to boost skating skills and transition scores.

'''Movement in Isolation'''

In this element, some of the figure skaters are isolated from the rest of the team while performing free skating elements such as spins, spirals, lifts, vaults, or jumps. The free skating elements must be performed by a minimum of three skaters and a maximum of less than half of the team.

'''Moves in the Field'''

This element is a sequence of movements that must include free skating moves such as spirals, spread eagles, Ina Bauers, and other flowing moves with strong edges, connected with linking steps. It must include at least three different free skating moves.

History

The Beginning of Synchronized Skating

In 1956, The first synchronized skating team was formed by Dr. Richard Porter, who became known as the 'father of synchronized skating'. The 'Hockettes' skated out of Ann Arbor, Michigan and entertained spectators during intermissions of the University of Michigan Wolverines hockey team. In the early days, precision skating resembled a drill team routine, or a precision dance company such as The Rockettes.
During the 1970s, the interest for this new sport spawned tremendous growth and development. As each season passed, more and more teams were developing more creative and innovative routines incorporating stronger basic skating skills, new maneuvers and more sophisticated transitions with greater speed, style and agility. Due to the enormous interest in the sport in North America, the first official international competition was held between Canadian and American teams in Michigan in March 1976. With the internationalization of the sport, it has evolved rapidly, with increasing emphasis on speed and skating skills, and "highlight" elements such as jumps, spirals, spins, and lifts that originally were not permitted in competition.

Competitions

International

There are international synchronized skating competitions at the Senior, Junior, and Novice levels. The International Skating Union held the first official World Synchronized Skating Championships in 2000 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. The top Junior teams from around the world competed from 2001 to 2012 at the ISU Junior World Challenge Cup, held in a different location every year. The JWCC were accompanied in 2013 by the ISU World Junior Synchronized Skating Championships, to be held biannually in odd-numbered years with the JWCC in even-numbered years. Other long-running, major international events attracting elite teams at different levels include the French Cup, Spring Cup, Neuchâtel Trophy, Cup of Berlin, Zagreb Snowflakes Trophy, Leon Lurje Trophy and Prague Cup.

ISU World Synchronized Skating Championships

The ISU World Synchronized Skating Championships are the world championships for synchronized skating. Held since 2000, the WSSC is an annual event organized by the International Skating Union and attracts the most elite teams from around the world to compete. The top positions have been dominated by Finland with three different World Champions and 19 medals and Sweden with the team with most World titles and medals for a single team. Other major countries include Canada with two gold, four silvers and five bronzes, as well as the United States with one silver and four bronzes.

ISU World Junior Synchronized Skating Championships

YearLocationGoldSilverBronzeSource
2020 Nottingham, United Kingdom Team Fintastic Team Junost Team Crystal Ice
2019 Neuchatel, Switzerland Team Junost Team Crystal Ice Team Skyliners
2018 Zagreb, Croatia Team Junost Team Skyliners Team Crystal Ice
2017 Mississauga, Canada Team Junost Team Fintastic Musketeers
2015 Zagreb, Croatia Musketeers Team Fintastic Les Suprêmes
2013 Helsinki, Finland Musketeers Team Fintastic Spartak-Junost

ISU Junior World Challenge Cup

YearLocationGoldSilverBronzeSource
2016 Zagreb, Croatia Les Suprêmes Team Fintastic Team Junost
2014 Neuchâtel, Switzerland Team Fintastic Les Suprêmes Musketeers
2012 Gothenburg, Sweden Team Fintastic Musketeers Les Suprêmes
2011 Neuchâtel, Switzerland Team Fintastic Musketeers Team Braemar
2010 Gothenburg, Sweden Team Fintastic NEXXICE Musketeers
2009 Neuchâtel, Switzerland Team Fintastic NEXXICE Musketeers
2008 Rouen, France Team Fintastic Gold Ice Musketeers
2007 Nottingham, Great Britain Team Fintastic Les Suprêmes Chicago Jazz
2006 Helsinki, Finland Musketeers Team Fintastic Chicago Jazz
2005 Neuchâtel, Switzerland Musketeers Team Mystique Gold Ice
2004 Milan, Italy Musketeers Team Mystique Gold Ice
2003 Kungsbacka, Sweden Musketeers Burlington Ice Image Les Suprêmes
2002 Zagreb, Croatia Ice Image Spartak-Leader Musketeers
2001 Neuchâtel, Switzerland Team Fintastic Les Suprêmes Superettes

Finland

The Finnish member of ISU, the Finnish Figure Skating Association, holds the Finnish Synchronized Skating Championships at the Novice, Junior and Senior levels. Also, it holds two Finnish Championships Qualifiers before the nationals. Since the late 1990s, the senior-level battle for the qualifier wins and Finnish Championship—and the ensuing ISU World Synchronized Skating Championships entries—has mainly been fought between three teams from Helsinki, Marigold IceUnity, Rockettes and Team Unique, while a fourth and sometimes a fifth Senior team has competed along in the intervening years.

Finnish Senior Championships medalists

Finnish qualifications for the ISU WSSC

Throughout the years, the Finnish senior teams qualifying for the World Championships have been selected based on their performance at the two qualifiers and the national championships. In the season 2012-13, the teams were selected as follows: the Finnish Champion qualified automatically as Team Finland 1 for the WSSC. Team Finland 2 at the WSSC was the team which earned the fewest points from the first qualifier, the second qualifier and the Finnish Championships. The points equaled the sum of the positions at the three competitions with growing coefficients: the coefficient was 0,3 for the first competition result, 0,5 for the second and 1 for the last.

United States

In the United States, there are several other recognized age and skill levels. Sanctioned by the US Figure Skating Association, the divisions include Beginner, Pre-Juvenile, Preliminary, Open Juvenile, Open Collegiate, and Open Adult and Juvenile, Intermediate, Novice, Junior, Senior, Collegiate, Adult, and Masters.
ISI is another governing body which focuses on a more recreational form of competition and does not have the same divisions as those of the USFSA. Teams can compete in the Tot, Jr. Youth, Youth Sr. Youth, Teen, Collegiate, Adult, or Master age groups, in any of five categories: Formation, Advanced Formation, Skating, Open Skating, and Dance.
While most skaters participating in synchronized skating are female, the rules allow mixed-gender teams.

US Figure Skating Senior Championship

The Senior team level consists of 16 skaters. Skaters must be at least 15 years old and have passed the Novice Moves in the Field test.
YearLocationGoldScoreSilverScoreBronzeScorePewterScoreSource
2020Providence, Rhode IslandHaydenettes203.19Skyliners194.94Crystallettes193.09Miami University192.39
2019Plymouth, MichiganHaydenettes226.37Skyliners218.14Crystallettes201.63Miami University196.95
2018Portland, OregonHaydenettes204.05Skyliners185.86Miami University182.99Crystalettes166.89
2017Rockford, IllinoisHaydenettes208.83Crystallettes189.50Skyliners172.96Miami University172.84
2016Kalamazoo, MichiganHaydenettes202.26Miami University183.86Skyliners169.47Crystallettes166.96
2015Providence, Rhode IslandHaydenettes210.55Miami University194.70Skyliners178.99Crystallettes173.78
2014Colorado Springs, ColoradoHaydenettes205.02Crystallettes179.77Starlights154.90Miami University149.64
2013Plymouth, MichiganHaydenettes206.33Miami University191.28Crystallettes176.96Skyliners151.56
2012Worcester, MassachusettsHaydenettes202.92Crystallettes185.54Miami University182.64ICE'Kateers145.15
2011Ontario, CaliforniaHaydenettes217.41Miami University195.50Crystallettes179.85California Gold
2010Minneapolis, MinnesotaHaydenettes231.14Crystallettes210.35Miami University202.68Starlights167.80
2009Portland, MaineMiami University204.72Haydenettes203.97Crystallettes184.10California Gold
2008Providence, Rhode IslandHaydenettes213.37Miami University201.26Crystallettes184.10California Gold
2007Colorado Springs, ColoradoHaydenettes201.04Miami University199.56Crystallettes159.65California Gold158.06
2006Grand Rapids, MichiganMiami University179.72Haydenettes161.28Crystallettes155.12Team Elan126.96
2005Lowell, MassachusettsHaydenettes*Miami University*Crystallettes*Team Elan*
2004San Diego, CaliforniaHaydenettes*Crystallettes*Team Elan*Miami University*
2003Huntsville, AlabamaHaydenettes*Miami University*Team Elan*Crystallettes*
2002Lake Placid, New YorkHaydenettes*Miami University*Crystallettes*
2001Colorado Springs, ColoradoHaydenettes*Miami University*Crystallettes*
2000Plymouth, MichiganHaydenettes*Team Elan*Miami University*
1999Tampa, FloridaMiami University*Haydenettes*Starlets
1998San Diego, CaliforniaHaydenettesMiami UniversityTeam Elan*
1997Syracuse, New YorkHaydenettes*Team Elan*Miami University*
1996Chicago, IllinoisHaydenettes*Miami University*Team Elan*
1995San Diego, CaliforniaTeam Elan*Haydenettes*Miami University*
1994Providence, Rhode IslandHaydenettes*Team Elan*Miami University*
1993Detroit, MichiganHaydenettes*Team Elan*Crystallettes*
1992Portland, MaineHaydenettes*Team Elan*Goldenettes*
1991Anchorage, AlaskaHaydenettes*Goldenettes*Fraserettes*
1990Houston, TexasGoldenettes*Haydenettes*Fraserettes*
1989Providence, Rhode IslandHaydenettes*Goldenettes*Detroit Capets*
1988Reno, NevadaHaydenettes*Fraserettes*Detroit Capets*
1987Tulsa, OklahomaFraserettes*Haydenettes*Figurettes*
1986Boston, MassachusettsHot Fudge Sundaes*Haydenettes*Detroit Capets*
1985Lakewood, OhioFraserettes*Ice Crystallettes*Minneapplettes*
1984Bowling Green, OhioFraserettes*Ice Crystallettes**

USFSA Collegiate Championship

The Collegiate team level consists of teams with 12-20 Figure skaters who must be enrolled in a college or degree program as full-time students. Skaters must also have passed the Juvenile Moves in the Field test. It is a Varsity Sport at colleges such as Miami University and Adrian College. Many more have developed club-level collegiate teams without varsity status such as the team at The University of Delaware and the University of Michigan. The Miami University Synchronized Skating Team has been a trailblazer in collegiate synchronized skating, fielding the first completely funded varsity synchronized skating program in the United States, as well as working towards gaining "Synchro" NCAA status in the United States.
YearLocationGoldScoreSilverScoreBronzeScoreSource
2016Kalamazoo, MichiganMiami University90.12Univ of Michigan86.28Metroettes82.15
2015Providence, RIMiami University94.12Univ of Michigan85.69Metroettes84.25
2014Colorado Springs, COMiami University96.80Team Excel78.77Michigan State78.60
2013Plymouth, MIMiami University92.26Univ of Delaware84.11Univ of Michigan77.98
2012Worcester, MAMiami University87.80Univ of Delaware84.29Univ of Michigan80.83
2011Ontario, CAMiami University96.16Michigan State85.17Univ of Michigan83.96
2010Minneapolis, MNMiami University107.60Univ of Michigan98.46Univ of Delaware94.97
2009Portland, MEMiami University100.63Univ of Illinois86.79Michigan State85.79
2008Providence, RIMiami University107.46Univ of Delaware97.77Michigan State87.11
2007Colorado Springs, COMiami University102.61Michigan State92.17Univ of Delaware88.74
2006Grand Rapids, MIMiami UniversityWestern MichiganUniv of Delaware
2005Lowell, MAMiami UniversityWestern MichiganMichigan State
2004San Diego, CAWestern MichiganMiami UniversityUniv of Delaware
2003Huntsville, ALMiami UniversityWestern MichiganUniv of Michigan
2002Lake Placid, NYMiami UniversityMichigan StateWestern Michigan
2001Colorado Springs, COMiami UniversityWestern MichiganMichigan State
2000Plymouth, MIMiami UniversityUniv of DelawareUniv of Michigan
1999Tampa, FLUniv of MichiganMiami UniversityUniv of Delaware
1998San Diego, CAMiami UniversityMichigan StateBowling Green
1997Syracuse, NYMiami UniversityBowling GreenWestern Michigan

Present day

Why not Synchro Petition

Although not currently an Olympic sport, it has already been reviewed for Olympic eligibility. Fans and participants of this fast-growing discipline have begun to strive for recognition by the rest of the skating and athletic world. In 2007 synchronized skating took one step closer to Olympic Games contention when it was selected to be part of the Universiade or World University Games as a demonstration sport. Countries from around the world competed in Turin, Italy with Sweden, Finland, and Russia coming out on top.
There are many speculations as to why synchronized skating may never become an Olympic sport. These include:
"Why Not Synchro" is an ongoing campaign which became popular over social media through the hashtag #whynotsynchro and #whynotsynchro2018 on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. This was popularized at the , held in Austria in January 2014. During the medal ceremonies, teams gathered on the ice and created the shape of the Olympic rings. This image was then shared widely over social media as skaters petitioned to get awareness about the sport. A petition to the International Olympic Committee was posted on change.org calling for 15,000 signatures and asking the IOC "Synchronized Figure Skating: Make it an Olympic Event." The petition states "The time has come to add this incredible event to the pinnacle of the sport of figure skating."

Effects of COVID-19

Due to the abrupt appearance of COVID-19, the 2019-2020 season was cut short to ensure safety of all teams. Elite US teams like the Haydenettes and Skyliners were not able to compete internationally due to travel restrictions set in place in late March and early April. The US Figure Skating Association ensures that the health and well-being of the athletes, members and figure skating community continues to be their first priority. However, teams and fans from all across the world are hopeful for the opportunity to compete in the upcoming 2020-2021 season.

News Coverage

Synchronized skating has been covered by since the sport's inception. International and national level competitions are covered by local newspapers highlighting local athletes and teams. Television coverage is taken by major news channels and is usually broadcast after the competition date. US Figure Skating also provides a live streaming service for national synchronized skating competitions.

Judging

International IJS System

The competitive levels of synchronized skating, like those in other disciplines of Figure skating, are now judged using the ISU Judging System that was introduced in 2004. Each element is assigned a difficulty level by the technical panel made-up of a technical specialist, assistant technical specialist and a technical controller. Each level of difficulty for a particular element corresponds to a pre-determined base value. The base value is the number of points that are awarded for an executed element before the grade of execution or any deductions are applied. The base value for every element can be found on the under ISU Communication 1532, Appendix D. Judges assign a grade of execution from -3 to +3 to each of the elements. Each grade of execution, or GOE, corresponds to a point value. For each element, the highest and lowest GOE values are dropped and the rest are averaged then added to the base value. The sum of all the scores of the elements comprises the Technical Elements score.

Program Component Score

The judges will award points on a scale from 0.25 to 10 for five program components to grade overall presentation. As with Grade of Execution, the highest and lowest scores for each component are thrown out, and the remaining scores are averaged. The final program components scores are then multiplied by a set factor to ensure the technical score and program components score are balanced.
The five program components are:
Each element of the program is assigned a base value, which gives skaters credit for every element they perform. Some elements, such as spins and step sequences, have levels of difficulty on which the base values are established. Judges grade the quality of each element using a grade of execution score within a range of -5 to +5, which is added to or deducted from the base value. GOEs are proportional to the base value of each element. The highest and lowest scores for each element are thrown out, and the remaining scores are averaged to determine the final GOE for each element. The GOE is then added to or subtracted from the base value for each element, and the sum of the scores for all elements forms the technical score.

Segment Sore

The technical score is added to the program components score to determine the segment score. The scores for each segment are then added together to determine the competition score. The skater with the highest competition score is declared the winner. In the event of a tie, the team with the highest free program score wins the competition. The IJS is used at events in the national qualifying structure including the U.S. Championships as well as many local competitions at the juvenile through senior levels, including Excel.

6.0 System

In the United States, the introductory levels of Preliminary, Pre-Juvenile, Open Juvenile, Open Junior, Open Collegiate, Open Adult, and Open Masters are still judged under the 6.0 judging system. These levels can compete at the regional level but cannot qualify for the national championships. The basic principle of the 6.0 system is a “majority” system. Each event is judged by an odd number of judges, and the winner of the event is the team placed highest by a majority of these judges.

Differences in Judging Systems

The IJS is based on cumulative points rather than the 6.0 standard of marks and placement. The IJS focuses on the skaters and not the judges. Judges don’t have to use their memory to compare all aspects of every skater and figure out where to place them, but simply evaluate the qualities of each performance.

Highest scores at ISU competitions

Short program

RankTeamScoreEventSource
1 Team Surprise87.842004 Neuchâtel Trophy
2 Rockettes83.462010 Cup of Berlin
3 Team Unique82.362009 Worlds
4 NEXXICE80.122009 Worlds
5 Marigold IceUnity78.682009 Worlds

Free skating

RankTeamScoreEventSource
1 Team Surprise159.602004 Neuchâtel Trophy
2 Marigold IceUnity147.312014 Worlds
3 NEXXICE146.032014 Worlds
4 Paradise145.842014 Zagreb Snowflakes Trophy
5 Rockettes145.682014 Worlds

Combined total

RankTeamScoreEventSource
1 Team Surprise247.442004 Neuchâtel Trophy
2 Rockettes223.902010 Worlds
3 NEXXICE223.582009 Worlds
4 Marigold IceUnity223.452014 Worlds
5 Paradise220.542014 Zagreb Snowflakes Trophy