Thomas Lepeltier


Thomas Lepeltier is a French independent scholar, essayist and science writer specializing in the history and philosophy of science and applied ethics, known in particular for his contributions to the field of animal law. He is the author of several philosophical works on animal ethics such as L'imposture intellectuelle des carnivores and of science history books including Darwin hérétique and Univers parallèles. Known initially as a science historian, he now mainly advocates in defense of animals in the French media.

Life and work

Following the completion of a PhD in astrophysics in 1994, Lepeltier taught in Newcastle, Toulouse, and Paris, he focused his research on the history and philosophy of science. He later discovered animal ethics and developed an interest in veganism after reading Charles Patterson's Eternal Treblinka. Lepeltier published La Révolution végétarienne in 2013, in which he explores the history of slavery abolition and argues that the "struggle for veganism will eventually succeed as the struggle against human slavery did". He became an Associate Fellow of the Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics in 2019.
Lepeltier has been called upon to debate animal ethics several times on French television, radio and forums. Lepeltier is also the author of several works attempting to deconstruct the discourses justifying the use of animals, he mobilizes on these occasions a wide variety of arguments from the three major currents of normative ethics, whether it is a question of recalling the definition of speciesism according to Peter Singer, that the theories of the social contract do not impose to be able to respect duties in order to have rights, or that it is cruel to deprive animals of their lives for the personal pleasure gained by eating them.
Lepeltier is also a regular contributor to the French popular science magazines La Recherche and Sciences Humaines and is an editor of and writer for the French-language antispeciesist journal L'Amorce.

Philosophy

Lepeltier's philosophy is anti-speciesist; he considers that the species to which a living being belongs is not in itself a relevant criterion of moral consideration and that in particular, the mere fact of belonging to a particular species cannot in itself justify that an animal can be killed to, for example, serve as a meal.
Particularly interested in the analysis of the speeches of French-speaking intellectuals, Lepeltier considers that "most say or even write anything to justify their consumption of meat, eggs and dairy products" and that "unfortunately, in a media world complacent, no one denounces this bad faith of professionals, this silence of politicians and this ineptitude of intellectuals". He has sometimes been criticised for his condemnation of all breeding and his use of analogies with human slavery or The Holocaust.
Lepeltier has distinguished himself within the French animalist movement, as a defender of interventionism in favor of reducing the suffering of wild animals. He believes that our lack of responsibility for the fate of wild animals should not make us indifferent to their fate; we should, he says, worry about wild animals and think of solutions to alleviate their suffering. Lepeltier has also engaged with the predation problem, arguing that predation is something that humans should work towards preventing.

Publications

As author