The Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 was enacted by the Parliament of New South Wales in 1995 to protect threatened species, populations and ecological communities in NSW. In 2016 it was replaced by the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016. These acts form the basis and the mechanisms in NSW by which species, populations and ecological communities are declared endangered, vulnerable or critically endangered, and under which people and corporations are prosecuted for destruction of habitat sheltering such species, populations or communities. The Act was repealed by the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 . Species, populations, and ecological communities are declared endangered on advice from the NSW scientific committee, which consists of 11 members appointed by the minister and whose purpose is to determine which species are to be listed as threatened species, which populations as endangered populations, and which ecological communities as endangered, critically endangered or vulnerable ecological communities. Additionally, the committee advises which processes should be listed as threatening processes, and advises the minister accordingly. Thus, now, under the Biodiversity Conservation Act, the Scientific Committee has declared various threatened species including, for example, the alpine she-oak skink and the alpine tree frog , while the Scientific Committee has determined Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub to be a critically endangered ecological community A range of species recovery plans have been made in direct accordance with the act. As well as specific rulings in accordance with the act.
The purpose of the act
The purpose of the TSC act was
to conserve biological diversity and promote ecologically sustainable development, and to prevent the extinction and promote the recovery of threatened species, populations and ecological communities, and to protect the critical habitat of those threatened species, populations and ecological communities that are endangered, and to eliminate or manage certain processes that threaten the survival or evolutionary development of threatened species, populations and ecological communities, and to ensure that the impact of any action affecting threatened species, populations and ecological communities is properly assessed, and to encourage the conservation of threatened species, populations and ecological communities by the adoption of measures involving co-operative management.
The Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 lists many more purposes under the rubric of "ecologically sustainable development" while hoping for "biodiversity conservation in the context of a changing climate" It maintains the framework of a Scientific Committee for determining endangered species and communities.
Some key concepts under the TSC act
In addition, the act outlines
procedures for listing species, and ecological communities as threatened
requirements for species recovery plans and their implementation
requirements for threat abatement plans
species impact statements
Biodiversity certification and requirements for "biobanking"
criminal acts under the TSC act
Cases under the act
Cases under the act are heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, and frequently concern contested development applications. See, for example, the judgment given in "Vigor Master Pty Ltd v Hornsby Shire Council " a case between a developer and a local council where remnants of Blue Gum High Forest, a critically endangered ecological community under the TSC Act, occurred on 61% of the site proposed for development, and that for "Mackenzie Architects International Pty Limited v Ku-ring-gai Council NSWLEC 1353", also involving the Blue Gum High Forest community, while the case, "David DeBattista v Shoalhaven City Council NSWLEC 1251",, concerned a threatened species, Melaleuca biconvexa, and a contested development application. In " Fife Capital Pty Ltd v Cumberland Council NSWLEC 1354" both proposed and preliminary work involving dam works and the endangered ecological community, River-Flat Eucalypt Forest on Coastal Floodplains of the New South Wales North Coast, were contested. In "Ingham Planning Pty Ltd v Ku-Ring-Gai Council NSWLEC 1222 the adequacy of a species impact statement concerning the critically endangered ecological community, Blue Gum High Forest, was contested. A case in 2003 in the Supreme Court of New South Wales appealed an earlier decision and the finding of the Scientific Committee, that Kurri Sand Swamp Woodland should be designated an endangered ecological community, with the appellant arguing that the committee's decision was invalid. The Land and Environment Court also hears cases involving offences under the act. Thus, in "Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Coffs Harbour Hardwoods Sales Pty Ltd NSWLEC 52", the defendant was found guilty of damaging vegetation under the act. The Land and Environment Court also makes orders under the act, which may be appealed. Thus, in "Warkworth Mining Limited v Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association Inc NSWCA 105", Warkworth mining appealed the decision of Preston CJ who had ruled against a proposed expansion of a coalmine which would have affected the"Warkworth Sands" endangered ecological community.
