Despite the failure of the campaign, he was appointed governor of the Jazira, and, about a year after the accession of Yazid II, he was named governor of Iraq, replacing his patron Maslama. This was a post of critical importance, encompassing at the time the entire eastern Caliphate, including all of Iran and Khurasan. In Khurasan, on the Caliph's instructions, he appointed first his fellow Qaysi, Sa'id ibn Amr al-Harashi, as deputy governor. Al-Harashi proved a capable commander against the Soghdian rebels, but too harsh in his dealings with domestic quarrels, even executing prisoners whose life Umar had guaranteed. As a result, he was replaced by the BakriMuslim ibn Sa'id ibn Aslam ibn Zur'a. In 721, Umar led a campaign into the Byzantine province of Armenia IV, where he seized 700 prisoners. Yazid II's accession marked a renewed ascendancy of the Qaysi party at court, and a return to the oppressive policies of the notoriousal-Hajjaj ibn Yusuf, interrupted only by the brief reformist reign of Umar II. In the wake of the suppression of Yazid ibn al-Muhallab's rebellion in Iraq, the province was held down in virtual occupation by the regime's trusted Qaysi Syro-Jaziran troops, and Umar appointed almost exclusively his fellow north Arab Qaysis to provincial governorships, virtually excluding the southArab tribes, traditionally dominant in Iraq, from power. His partisanship was so blatant that the contemporary Iraqi poet al-Farazdaq called him the "glory and supreme support" of the northern Arabs. Indeed, when Caliph Hisham ibn Abd al-Malik came to power in 724, one of his first acts was to dismiss Umar from his post, and replace him with Khalid al-Qasri, whose tribal origin made him neutral in the Qays–Yaman conflict. Umar was tortured and freed only after giving up a considerable part of his fortune. His followers arranged for him to flee to Syria, where he was given shelter by Maslama and later by Caliph Hisham himself. He died sometime between 724 and 726.
Legacy
The Islamic scholar Jean-Claude Vadet assesses Umar's governorship thus: "Harsh in his treatment of those he conquered, Ibn Hubayra seems to have governed in the name of Arabism and Islam, regarded as a religion of the sword. His methods of governing, however, were not above reproach, although in fact this great Arab nobleman, proud of belonging to the Ghatafan, was accused more of cynicism than of corruption." The historian Hugh Kennedy calls him a "Qaysi thug", and "violent and brutal" in his persecution of Yamani leaders. As a result of his fervent championship of the Qays in the Qays–Yaman conflict, both he, and his son, Yazid, who would serve as governor of Iraq under Marwan II, receive a very negative treatment in the sources. The only exception are a series of more intimate anecdotes preserved by Ibn Asakir, showing Umar dealing with poets and religious scholars, as well as showing mercy to enemies. It is unclear, however, whether this material is contemporary or represents later attempts to rehabilitate his legacy.
