Western New England English


Western New England English refers to the varieties of New England English native to Vermont, Connecticut, and the western half of Massachusetts; New York State's Hudson Valley also aligns to this classification. Sound patterns historically associated with Western New England English include the features of rhoticity, the horse–hoarse merger, and the father–bother merger, none of which are features traditionally shared in neighboring Eastern New England English. The status of the cot–caught merger in Western New England is inconsistent, being complete in the north of this dialect region, but incomplete or absent in the south, with a "cot–caught approximation" in the middle area.
Western New England English is relatively difficult for most American laypersons and even dialectologists to identify by any "distinct" accent when compared to its popularly recognized neighbors, meaning that its accents are perceived by some as having unmarked "General American" varieties. Linguistic research, however, reveals that Western New England English is not simply one single or uniform dialect. Linguist Charles Boberg proposes that it be most generally divided into a Northwestern New England English and a Southwestern New England English ; however, even Boberg lists the possibilities of several distinct accent divisions of Western New England.

Vocabulary

Vocabulary features that predominate in Western New England English include grinder for sub, and tag sale for garage sale.

Overview of phonology

Some Western New England speakers show the "generating conditions" for the Northern Cities Vowel Shift in backing of , possible fronting of to, and tensing all instances of to something like. Though actually variable, these features occur among Western New England speakers just enough to suggest that they may be the "pivot conditions" that influenced the NCVS in the Inland North, likely beginning in the early twentieth century.
The English of Western New England in fact shows many sharp differences throughout rather than one uniform accent. In 2001, Charles Boberg, discussing that Western New England English was a likely direct influence on the Inland Northern English of the Great Lakes region, still identified as many as four or five English sub-regional accents within Western New England itself, based on data from the late 1990s:
Charles Boberg argues that Northwestern New England English, due to its cot–caught merger but failure to demonstrate other features of the Eastern New England dialect, must be considered as its own separate dialect. On the other hand, in discussing Southwestern New England English as its own unique dialect, he instead proposed that it be regarded as a "subtype" of the Inland North dialect, based on the aforementioned commonalities, even if variable, such as the universal raising of the short a and no cot–caught merger. However, some younger Southwestern New England speakers have diverged away from both of these features, which Boberg at least partly foresaw; such variables are discussed in greater detail below.

Northwestern New England

Northwestern New England English, popularly recognized as a Vermont accent, is the most complete or advanced Western New England English variety in terms of the cot–caught merger, occurring largely everywhere in that area north of Northampton, Massachusetts, towards. Today, speakers documented in Burlington and Rutland show consistent fronting of before, therefore towards, in words like car or barn. The first element of remains low and lax, similar to, and sometimes with no glide as monophthongal.

Burlington

Northwestern Vermont shows no raising of , and therefore stays back in the mouth, leading to a cot–caught merger to ; this whole process follows the logic of the Canadian Shift of Standard Canadian English.

Rural Vermont

Since the mid-twentieth century, Vermont speakers have largely avoided stigmatized local features, and now follow the rhotic r of the rest of Western New England. However, before this time, the eastern edge of Vermont spoke Eastern New England English, even dropping the r sound everywhere except before vowels, just like in traditional Boston or Maine accents. These speakers may retain vestigial elements of Eastern New England's trap-bath split, backing and lowering in certain environments. Today, a dwindling, generally rural, older, and male segment of the northern Vermont population uniquely pronounces with a raised starting point as and with a backer, raised, or somewhat more rounded starting point as. A deep retroflex approximant for "r" may be noted among rural northern speakers, perhaps inherited from West Country or Scots-Irish ancestors, due to such immigrants largely settling in western New England. One notable lifelong native speaker of the rural Vermont accent was Fred Tuttle.

Rutland

Southwestern Vermont shows a universal raising to and fronting to, but then oversteps and defies the logical direction of the Northern Cities Vowel Shift by producing a cot–caught merger to. The universal raising is most consistently recorded in speakers born before 1950; those born since 1960 show somewhat less raising.

Southwestern New England

Southwestern New England English is centered primarily around Hartford, CT and Springfield, MA. Its older speakers show more instances of universal tensing of the short a, while younger speakers show the more General American feature of tensing this vowel only before nasal consonants. The Atlas of North American English confirms that this raising phenomenon is highly variable in the region, though studies agree that raising always occurs strongest before nasal consonants.
Regarding the cot–caught merger, Southwestern New England speech has historically lacked the merger, before entering a transitional state of the merger in the mid-1900s. A "cot–caught approximation" now prevails especially in Springfield and western Massachusetts, but is variable from one speaker to the next with no apparent age-based correlation, except that the youngest speakers now are tending to demonstrate a full merger. Local, especially working-class speakers of southwestern Connecticut and the Albany area of New York State, strongly influenced by nearby New York City dialect, continue to resist the cot–caught merger.

Hudson Valley

Though not belonging geographically to New England, New York State's Hudson Valley speaks a sub-type of Southwestern New England English, demonstrating additional influence from New York City English. Albany English shows Southwestern New England English's slight backing of and possible fronting of to, but New York City's caught vowel and, though having a continuous short-a system, still shows influence from New York City's short-a split system. Also, Albany starts fairly back and somewhat forward in the mouth.