Wigner's classification


In mathematics and theoretical physics, Wigner's classification
is a classification of the nonnegative energy irreducible unitary representations of the Poincaré group which have sharp mass eigenvalues. It was introduced by Eugene Wigner, to classify particles and fields in physics—see the article particle physics and representation theory. It relies on the stabilizer subgroups of that group, dubbed the Wigner little groups of various mass states.
The Casimir invariants of the Poincaré group are, where is the 4-momentum operator, and, where is the Pauli-Lubanski pseudovector. The eigenvalues of these operators serve to label the representations. The first is associated with mass-squared and the second with helicity or spin.
The physically relevant representations may thus be classified according to whether ; but ; and with. Wigner found that massless particles are fundamentally different from massive particles.
As an example, let us visualize the irreducible unitary representation with and. It corresponds to the space of massive scalar fields.
Let be the hyperboloid sheet defined by:
The Minkowski metric restricts to a Riemannian metric on, giving the metric structure of a hyperbolic space, in particular it is the hyperboloid model of hyperbolic space, see geometry of Minkowski space for proof. The Poincare group acts on because it preserves the Minkowski inner product, and an element of the translation subgroup of the Poincare group acts on by multiplication by suitable phase multipliers, where. These two actions can be combined in a clever way using induced representations to obtain an action
of on that combines motions of and phase multiplication.
This yields an action of the Poincare group on the space of square-integrable functions defined on the hypersurface in Minkowski space. These may be viewed as measures defined on Minkowski space that are concentrated on the set defined by
The Fourier transform of such measures yields positive-energy, finite-energy solutions of the Klein–Gordon equation defined on Minkowski space, namely
without physical units. In this way, the irreducible representation of the Poincare group is realized by its action on a suitable space of solutions of a linear wave equation.

The theory of projective representations

Physically, one is interested in irreducible projective unitary representations of the Poincaré group. After all, two vectors in the quantum Hilbert space that differ by multiplication by a constant represent the same physical state. Thus, two unitary operators that differ by a multiple of the identity have the same action on physical states. Therefore the unitary operators that represent Poincaré symmetry are only defined up to a constant—and therefore the group composition law need only hold up to a constant.
According to, every projective unitary representation of the Poincaré group comes for an ordinary unitary representation of its universal cover, which is a double cover.
Passing to the double cover is important because it allows for fractional spin cases. In the positive mass case, for example, the little group is SU rather than SO; the representations of SU then include both integer and fractional spin cases.
Since the general criterion in Bargmann's theorem was not known when Wigner did his classification, he needed to show by hand that the phases can be chosen in the operators to reflect the composition law in the group, up to a sign, which is then accounted for by passing to the double cover of the Poincaré group.

Further information

Left out from this classification are tachyonic solutions, solutions with no fixed mass, infraparticles with no fixed mass, etc. Such solutions are of physical importance, when considering virtual states. A celebrated example is the case of deep inelastic scattering, in which a virtual space-like photon is exchanged between the incoming lepton and the incoming hadron. This justifies the introduction of transversely and longitudinally-polarized photons, and of the related concept of transverse and longitudinal structure functions, when considering these virtual states as effective probes of the internal quark and gluon contents of the hadrons. From a mathematical point of view, one considers the SO group instead of the usual SO group encountered in the usual massive case discussed above. This explains the occurrence of two transverse polarization vectors and
which satisfy and, to be compared with the usual case of a free boson which has three polarization vectors, each of them satisfying.