Will of Henry VIII of England
The will of Henry VIII of England was a significant constitutional document, or set of contested documents created in the 1530s and 1540s, affecting English and Scottish politics for the rest of the 16th century. In conjunction with legislation passed by the English Parliament, it was supposed to have a regulative effect in deciding the succession to the three following monarchs of the House of Tudor, the three legitimate and illegitimate children of King Henry VIII of England. Its actual legal and constitutional status was much debated; and arguably the succession to Elizabeth I of England did not respect Henry's wishes.
Last testament
Henry VIII made a final revision to his last will and testament on 30 December 1546. It was signed using the "dry stamp", a device in use since 1545 and under the control of Anthony Denny and John Gates. It confirmed the line of succession as Edward, Mary and Elizabeth; following them, the Grey and Suffolk families. The will was read, stamped and sealed on 27 January 1547, when the dying king was past speech. He died within hours, the next day.The document still exists, but this fact was not generally known or accepted by the 1560s, when some believed it was lost, or had been destroyed.
The 16 executors
The will appointed 16 executors. This body had little impact in the short term, because its powers were given to a smaller group. It was officially the council of Edward VI of England until 12 March 1547, after which Protector Somerset nominated the council. The effective end of the Somerset Protectorate came in early 1550. Those executors who were still alive had a leading constitutional role, in theory from 13 October 1549.The executors comprised:
Name | Position/profession | Religious orientation | Date of death |
Thomas Bromley | Chief Justice of the King's Bench | 1555 | |
Sir Anthony Browne | Courtier | Catholic | 1548 |
Thomas Cranmer | Archbishop of Canterbury | Reformer | 1556 |
Sir Anthony Denny | Courtier | Reformer | 1549 |
John Dudley, Viscount Lisle | Military leader | Reformer | 1553 |
Sir William Herbert | Courtier | Reformer | 1570 |
Sir Edward Montague | Chief Justice of the Common Pleas | 1557 | |
Sir Edward North | Lawyer | Neutral | 1564 |
Sir William Paget | Politician | Neutral | 1563 |
William Paulet, Baron St John of Basing | Politician | Neutral | 1572 |
John Russell | Admiral | Reformer | 1555 |
Edward Seymour, Earl of Hertford | Military leader | Reformer | 1552 |
Cuthbert Tunstall | Bishop of Durham | Catholic | 1559 |
Sir Edward Wotton | Administrator | ? Catholic | 1551 |
Nicholas Wotton | Cleric and diplomat | ? Catholic | 1567 |
Thomas Wriothesley | Administrator | Catholic | 1550 |
Pollard wrote that the traditional view, that the balance of the group of executors on the religious question was deliberately poised to create an equilibrium, is mistaken: the exclusion of Stephen Gardiner tipped the balance to the evangelical reformers. MacCulloch considers that in 1550, after the fall of Somerset, there was a balance, but that the evangelicals manoeuvred to a position of superiority.