Xargs
xargs is a command on Unix and most Unix-like operating systems used to build and execute commands from standard input. It converts input from standard input into arguments to a command.
Some commands such as
grep
and awk
can take input either as command-line arguments or from the standard input. However, others such as cp
and echo
can only take input as arguments, which is why xargs is necessary.Examples
One use case of the xargs command is to remove a list of files using the rm command. POSIX systems have an for the maximum total length of the command line, so the command may fail with an error message of "Argument list too long" :This can be rewritten using the
xargs
command to break the list of arguments into sublists small enough to be acceptable:find /path -type f -print | xargs rm
In the above example, the
find
utility feeds the input of xargs
with a long list of file names. xargs
then splits this list into sublists and calls rm
once for every sublist.xargs can also be used to parallelize operations with the
-P maxprocs
argument to specify how many parallel processes should be used to execute the commands over the input argument lists. However, the output streams may not be synchronized. This can be overcome by using an --output file
argument where possible, and then combining the results after processing. The following example queues 24 processes and waits on each to finish before launching another.find /path -name '*.foo' | xargs -P 24 -I /cpu/bound/process -o ''.out
xargs often covers the same functionality as the command substitution feature of many shells, denoted by the backquote notation. xargs is also a good companion for commands that output long lists of files such as
find
, locate
and grep
, but only if one uses -0
, since xargs
without -0
deals badly with file names containing ', " and space. GNU Parallel is a similar tool that offers better compatibility with find, locate and grep when file names may contain ', ", and space.Placement of arguments
: single argument
The xargs command offers options to insert the listed arguments at some position other than the end of the command line. The -I option to xargs takes a string that will be replaced with the supplied input before the command is executed. A common choice is %.$ mkdir ~/backups
$ find /path -type f -name '*~' -print0 | xargs -0 -I % cp -a % ~/backups
The string to replace may appear multiple times in the command part. Using at all limits the number of lines used each time to one.
: any number
Another way to achieve a similar effect is to use a shell as the launched command, and deal with the complexity in that shell, for example:$ mkdir ~/backups
$ find /path -type f -name '*~' -print0 | xargs -0 sh -c 'for filename; do cp -a "$filename" ~/backups; done' sh
The word at the end of the line is for the POSIX shell to fill in for, the "executable name" part of the positional parameters. If it weren't present, the name of the first matched file would be instead assigned to
$0
and the file wouldn't be copied to ~/backups
. One can also use any other word to fill in that blank, for example.Since accepts multiple files at once, one can also simply do the following:
$ find /path -type f -name '*~' -print0 | xargs -0 sh -c 'if ; then cp -a "$@" ~/backup; fi' sh
This script runs with all the files given to it when there are any arguments passed. Doing so is more efficient since only one invocation of is done for each invocation of.
Separator problem
Many Unix utilities are line-oriented. These may work withxargs
as long as the lines do not contain '
, "
, or a space. Some of the Unix utilities can use NUL as record separator, locate
, find
, grep
, sort
). Using -0
for xargs
deals with the problem, but many Unix utilities cannot use NUL as separator.But often people forget this and assume
xargs
is also line-oriented, which is not the case.The separator problem is illustrated here:
- Make some targets to practice on
touch 'not important_file'
mkdir -p '12" records'
find. -name not\* | tail -1 | xargs rm
find \! -name. -type d | tail -1 | xargs rmdir
Running the above will cause
important_file
to be removed but will remove neither the directory called 12" records
, nor the file called not important_file
.The proper fix is to use the GNU-specific
-print0
option, but tail
do not support NUL-terminated strings:- use the same preparation commands as above
find \! -name. -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rmdir
When using the
-print0
option, entries are separated by a null character instead of an end-of-line. This is equivalent to the more verbose command:xargs
to line-oriented mode with the -d
option: but in general using
-0
with -print0
should be preferred, since newlines in filenames are still a problem.GNU
parallel
is an alternative to xargs
that is designed to have the same options, but is line-oriented. Thus, using GNU Parallel instead, the above would work as expected.For Unix environments where
xargs
does not support the -0
nor the option, the POSIX standard states that one can simply backslash-escape every character:Operating on a subset of arguments at a time
One might be dealing with commands that can only accept one or maybe two arguments at a time. For example, thediff
command operates on two files at a time. The -n
option to xargs
specifies how many arguments at a time to supply to the given command. The command will be invoked repeatedly until all input is exhausted. Note that on the last invocation one might get fewer than the desired number of arguments if there is insufficient input. Use xargs
to break up the input into two arguments per line:$ echo | xargs -n 2
0 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
In addition to running based on a specified number of arguments at a time, one can also invoke a command for each line of input with the
-L 1
option. One can use an arbitrary number of lines at a time, but one is most common. Here is how one might diff
every git commit against its parent.$ git log --format="%H %P" | xargs -L 1 git diff
Encoding problem
The argument separator processing ofxargs
is not the only problem with using the xargs
program in its default mode. Most Unix tools which are often used to manipulate filenames are text processing tools. However, Unix path names are not really text. Consider a path name /aaa/bbb/ccc. The /aaa directory and its bbb subdirectory can in general be created by different users with different environments. That means these users could have a different locale setup, and that means that aaa and bbb do not even necessarily have to have the same character encoding. For example, aaa could be in UTF-8 and bbb in Shift JIS. As a result, an absolute path name in a Unix system may not be correctly processable as text under a single character encoding. Tools which rely on their input being text may fail on such strings.One workaround for this problem is to run such tools in the C locale, which essentially processes the bytes of the input as-is. However, this will change the behavior of the tools in ways the user may not expect.