Yinotheria
Yinotheria is a proposed basal subclass clade of crown mammals that contains a few fossils of the Mesozoic and the extant monotremes. Today, there are only five surviving species, which live in Australia and New Guinea, but fossils have been found in England, China, Russia, Madagascar and Argentina. The surviving species consist of the platypus and four species of echidna.
Evolutionary history
According to genetic studies, Yinotheria diverged from other mammals around 220 to 210 million years ago, at some point in the Triassic or Early Jurassic. The oldest-known fossils are a bit younger, dating around 168 to 163 million years in the Middle Jurassic. These fossils are the genera Pseudotribos of China, Shuotherium of both China and England, Itatodon of Siberia and Paritatodon of Kyrgyzstan and England. These, which belong to the family Shuotheriidae, are the only known northern hemisphere group of yinotherians.The infraclass Australosphenida appeared around the same time as Shuotheriidae. The family Henosferidae, comprising the genera Henosferus, Ambondro, and Asfaltomylos, has been found in the southern hemisphere at locations in Argentina and Madagascar. This suggests that this family could have been more widespread and diverse in Gondwana during that time; however, due to their fragile state, some fossils might have been destroyed by geological events.
The family Ausktribosphenidae and the first monotremes appeared in the Early Cretaceous, in the region that is now known as Australasia. Despite being found in the same region of the world and in the same time period, recent work has found that the older Henosferidae is the sister taxon to Monotremata, with Ausktribosphenidae being the next sister taxa in Australosphenida. Ausktribosphenidae includes the genera Bishops and Ausktribosphenos.
Some 110-million-year-old monotreme fossil jaw fragments were found at Lightning Ridge, New South Wales. These fragments, from the species Steropodon galmani, are the oldest known monotreme fossils. Fossils from the genera Kollikodon, Teinolophos, and Obdurodon have also been discovered. In 1991, a fossil tooth of a 61-million-year-old platypus was found in southern Argentina. Molecular clock and fossil dating give a wide range of dates for the split between echidnas and platypuses, with one survey putting the split at 19 to 48 million years ago, but another putting it at 17 to 89 million years ago. All these dates are more recent than the oldest known platypus fossils, suggesting that both the short-beaked and long-beaked echidna species are derived from a platypus-like ancestor.
Systematics
History of classification
Prototheria
Originally, monotremes were classified as a subclass of mammals known as Prototheria. The names Prototheria, Metatheria and Eutheria refer to the three mammalian groupings that have living representatives. Each of the three may be defined as a total clade containing a living crown-group plus any fossil species that are more closely related to that crown-group than to any other living animals.The threefold division of living mammals into monotremes, marsupials and placentals was already well established when Thomas Huxley proposed the names Metatheria and Eutheria to incorporate the two latter groups in 1880. Initially treated as subclasses, Metatheria and Eutheria are by convention now grouped as infraclasses of the subclass Theria, and in more recent proposals have been demoted further, as cladistic reappraisals of the relationships between living and fossil mammals have suggested that the Theria itself should be reduced in rank.
Prototheria, on the other hand, was generally recognised as a subclass until quite recently, on the basis of a hypothesis that defined the group by two supposed synapomorphies: formation of the side wall of the braincase from a bone called the anterior lamina, contrasting with the alisphenoid in therians; and a linear alignment of molar cusps, contrasting with a triangular arrangement in therians. These characters appeared to unite monotremes with a range of Mesozoic fossil orders in a broader clade for which the name Prototheria was retained, and of which monotremes were thought to be only the last surviving branch.
Australosphenida hypothesis and Yinotheria
The evidence that was held to support Prototheria is now universally discounted. In the first place, the examination of embryos has revealed that the development of the braincase wall is essentially identical in therians and in 'prototherians': the anterior lamina simply fuses with the alisphenoid in therians, and therefore the 'prototherian' condition of the braincase wall is primitive for all mammals, while the therian condition can be derived from it. Additionally, the linear alignment of molar cusps is also primitive for all mammals. Therefore, neither of these states can supply a uniquely shared derived character that would support a 'prototherian' grouping of orders in contradistinction to Theria.In a further reappraisal, the molars of embryonic and fossil monotremes appear to demonstrate an ancestral pattern of cusps that is similar to the triangular arrangement observed in therians. Some peculiarities of this dentition support an alternative grouping of monotremes with certain recently discovered fossil forms into a proposed new clade known as the Australosphenida, and also suggest that the triangular array of cusps may have evolved independently in australosphenidans and therians. Australosphenida is characterized by the shared presence of a cingulum on the outer front corner of the lower molars, a short and broad talonid, a relatively low trigonid, and a triangulated last lower premolar.
The Australosphenida hypothesis remains controversial; for example, lingual cingula seem to be a presence in various non-australosphenidan mammals and some work has shown the possibility of Eutheria being the sister group to Australosphenida, without monotremes. As a result, some taxonomists prefer to maintain the name Prototheria as a fitting contrast to the other group of living mammals, the Theria. In theory, the Prototheria is taxonomically redundant, since Monotremata is currently the only order that can still be confidently included, but its retention might be justified if new fossil evidence, or a re-examination of known fossils, enables extinct relatives of the monotremes to be identified and placed within a wider grouping.
When systematic work was performed, it was also found that Australosphenida is the sister taxon to Shuotheriidae, an obscure group of Mesozoic mammals that were found in what is now China. had this to say regarding the Shuotheriidae, particularly Shuotherium:
Yinotheria is named for this grouping.
Taxonomy
In comparison to Metatheria and Eutheria, where there seems to be a better understanding on the relationships among taxa with substantial fossil evidence, Yinotheria has few fossils; mostly consisting of the jawbones and teeth. In addition, the group seems not to have been as diverse in their evolutionary history, in comparison to members of both Metatheria and Eutheria. Future analysis and better fossil remains could affect the membership of Yinotheria as well as rearranging and revising the relationships of stem-monotremes and crowned monotremes.- Subclass Yinotheria Chow & Rich 1982 sensu Kielan-Jaworowska, Cifelli & Luo 2004
- * Order †Shuotherida Chow & Rich 1982
- ** Family †Shuotheriidae Chow & Rich 1982
- *** Genus †Pseudotribos Luo, Ji & Yuan 2007
- **** †Pseudotribos robustus Luo, Ji & Yuan 2007
- *** Genus †Shuotherium Chow & Rich 1982
- **** †Shuotherium dongi Chow & Rich 1982
- **** †Shuotherium shilongi Wang et al. 1998
- * Infraclass Australosphenida Luo, Cifelli & Kielan-Jaworowska 2001 sensu Kielan-Jaworowska, Cifelli & Luo 2004
- ** Order †Ausktribosphenida Luo, Cifelli & Kielan-Jaworowska 2001
- *** Family †Ausktribosphenidae Rich et al. 1997
- **** Genus †Bishops Rich et al. 2001
- ***** †Bishops whitmorei Rich et al. 2001
- **** Genus †Ausktribosphenos Rich et al. 1997
- ***** †Ausktribosphenos nyktos Rich et al. 1997
- ** Order †Henosferida Averianov & Lopatin 2011
- *** Family †Henosferidae Rougier et al. 2007
- **** Genus †Ambondro
- ***** †Ambondro mahabo Flynn et al. 1999
- **** Genus †Asfaltomylos Rauhut et al. 2002
- ***** †Asfaltomylos patagonicus Rauhut et al. 2002
- **** Genus †Henosferus Rougier et al. 2007
- ***** †Henosferus molus Rougier et al. 2007
- ** Order Monotremata Bonaparte 1837 sensu Luo, Cifelli & Kielan-Jaworowska 2001
- *** Genus †Kryoryctes Pridmore et al. 2005
- **** †Kryoryctes cadburyi Pridmore et al. 2005
- *** Suborder Tachyglossa Gill 1872
- **** Family Tachyglossidae Gill 1872
- ***** Genus †Megalibgwilia Griffiths, Wells & Barrie 1991
- ****** †Megalibgwilia robusta
- ****** †Megalibgwilia ramsayi
- ***** Genus Zaglossus Gill 1877
- ****** †Zaglossus hacketti Glauert 1914
- ****** Zaglossus bruijni
- ****** Zaglossus attenboroughii Flannery & Groves 1998
- ****** Zaglossus bartoni Thomas 1907
- ***** Genus Tachyglossus Illiger 1811
- ****** Tachyglossus aculeatus Illiger 1811
- *** Suborder Platypoda Gill 1872
- **** Family †Kollikodontidae Flannery et al. 1995
- ***** Genus †Kollikodon Flannery et al. 1995
- ****** †Kollikodon ritchiei Flannery et al. 1995
- **** Family †Steropodontidae Archer et al. 1985
- ***** Genus †Teinolophos Rich et al. 1999
- ****** †Teinolophos trusleri Rich et al. 1999
- ***** Genus †Steropodon Archer et al. 1985
- ****** †Steropodon galmani Archer et al. 1985
- **** Family Ornithorhynchidae Gray 1825
- ***** Genus †Monotrematum Pascual et al. 1992
- ****** †Monotrematum sudamericanum Pascual et al. 1992
- ***** Genus †Obdurodon Woodburne & Tedford 1975
- ****** †Obdurodon insignis Woodburne & Tedford 1975
- ****** †Obdurodon tharalkooschild Pian, Archer & Hand 2013
- ****** †Obdurodon dicksoni Archer et al. 1992
- ***** Genus Ornithorhynchus Blumenbach 1800
- ****** Ornithorhynchus anatinus Blumenbach 1800
Phylogeny