High-level synthesis
High-level synthesis, sometimes referred to as C synthesis, electronic system-level synthesis, algorithmic synthesis, or behavioral synthesis, is an automated design process that interprets an algorithmic description of a desired behavior and creates digital hardware that implements that behavior. Synthesis begins with a high-level specification of the problem, where behavior is generally decoupled from e.g. clock-level timing. Early HLS explored a variety of input specification languages., although recent research and commercial applications generally accept synthesizable subsets of ANSI C/C++/SystemC/MATLAB. The code is analyzed, architecturally constrained, and scheduled to transcompile into a register-transfer level design in a hardware description language, which is in turn commonly synthesized to the gate level by the use of a logic synthesis tool. The goal of HLS is to let hardware designers efficiently build and verify hardware, by giving them better control over optimization of their design architecture, and through the nature of allowing the designer to describe the design at a higher level of abstraction while the tool does the RTL implementation. Verification of the RTL is an important part of the process.
Hardware can be designed at varying levels of abstraction. The commonly used levels of abstraction are gate level, register-transfer level, and algorithmic level.
While logic synthesis uses an RTL description of the design, high-level synthesis works at a higher level of abstraction, starting with an algorithmic description in a high-level language such as SystemC and ANSI C/C++. The designer typically develops the module functionality and the interconnect protocol. The high-level synthesis tools handle the micro-architecture and transform untimed or partially timed functional code into fully timed RTL implementations, automatically creating cycle-by-cycle detail for hardware implementation. The implementations are then used directly in a conventional logic synthesis flow to create a gate-level implementation.
History
Early academic work extracted scheduling, allocation, and binding as the basic steps for high-level-synthesis. Scheduling partitions the algorithm in control steps that are used to define the states in the finite-state machine. Each control step contains one small section of the algorithm that can be performed in a single clock cycle in the hardware. Allocation and binding maps the instructions and variables to the hardware components, multiplexers, registers and wires of the data path.First generation behavioral synthesis was introduced by Synopsys in 1994 as Behavioral Compiler and used Verilog or VHDL as input languages. The abstraction level used was partially timed processes. Tools based on behavioral Verilog or VHDL were not widely adopted in part because neither languages nor the partially timed abstraction were well suited to modeling behavior at a high level. 10 years later, in early 2004, Synopsys end-of-lifed Behavioral Compiler.
In 2004, there emerged a number of next generation commercial high-level synthesis products which provided synthesis of circuits specified at C level to a register transfer level specification. Synthesizing from the popular C language offered accrued abstraction, expressive power and coding flexibility while tying with existing flows and legacy models. This language shift, combined with other technical advances was a key enabler for successful industrial usage. High-level synthesis tools are used for complex ASIC and FPGA design.
High-level synthesis was primarily adopted in Japan and Europe in the early years. As of late 2008, there was an emerging adoption in the United States.
Process stages
The high-level synthesis process consists of a number of activities. Various high-level synthesis tools perform these activities in different orders using different algorithms. Some high-level synthesis tools combine some of these activities or perform them iteratively to converge on the desired solution.- Lexical processing
- Algorithm optimization
- Control/Dataflow analysis
- Library processing
- Resource allocation
- Scheduling
- Functional unit binding
- Register binding
- Output processing
- Input Rebundling
Functionality
Architectural constraints
Synthesis constraints for the architecture can automatically be applied based on the design analysis. These constraints can be broken into- Hierarchy
- Interface
- Memory
- Loop
- Low-level timing constraints
- iteration
Interface synthesis
Vendors
Data reported on recent SurveyStatus | Compiler | Owner | License | Input | Output | Year | Domain | Test Bench | FP | FixP |
In Use | TIMA Lab. | Academic | C subset | VHDL | 2012 | All | Yes | No | No | |
In Use | Y Explorations | Commercial | C | VHDL/Verilog | 2001 | All | Yes | No | Yes | |
In Use | PoliMi | Academic | C | VHDL/Verilog | 2012 | All | Yes | Yes | No | |
In Use | Bluespec | BlueSpec Inc. | Commercial | BSV | SystemVerilog | 2007 | All | No | No | No |
In Use | CHC | Altium | Commercial | C subset | VHDL/Verilog | 2008 | All | No | Yes | Yes |
In Use | CoDeveloper | Impulse Accelerated | Commercial | Impulse-C | VHDL | 2003 | Image Streaming | Yes | Yes | No |
In Use | MathWorks | Commercial | MATLAB, Simulink, Stateflow, Simscape | VHDL / Verilog | 2003 | Control Systems, Signal Processing, Wireless, Radar, Communications, Image and Computer Vision | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
In Use | Stratus | Cadence | Commercial | C/C++ SystemC | RTL | 2015 | All | Yes | No | Yes |
In Use | CyberWorkbench | NEC | Commercial | BDL, SystemC | VHDL/Verilog | 2011 | All | Cycle/ Formal | Yes | Yes |
In Use | Catapult | Mentor | Commercial | C, C++, SystemC | VHDL/Verilog | 2004 | Streaming | No | No | Yes |
In Use | DWARV | TU. Delft | Academic | C subset | VHDL | 2012 | All | Yes | Yes | Yes |
In Use | U. Bretagne | Academic | C/C++ | VHDL | 2010 | DSP | Yes | No | Yes | |
In Use | Lombiq Technologies | Commercial | C#/C++/F#... | VHDL | 2015 | .NET | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
In Use | FPGA Cores | Commercial | C/C++ | VHDL/Verilog | 2019 | All | Yes | No | No | |
In Use | Intel FPGA | Commercial | C/C++ | Verilog | 2017 | All | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
In Use | LegUp Computing | Commercial | C/C++ | Verilog | 2017 | All | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
In Use | U. Toronto | Academic | C | Verilog | 2011 | All | Yes | Yes | No | |
In Use | MaxCompiler | Maxeler | Commercial | MaxJ | RTL | 2010 | DataFlow | No | Yes | No |
In Use | Jacquard Comp. | Commercial | C subset | VHDL | 2010 | Streaming | No | Yes | No | |
In Use | Symphony C | Synopsys | Commercial | C/C++ | VHDL/Verilog/ SystemC | 2010 | All | Yes | No | Yes |
In Use | Xilinx | Commercial | C/C++/SystemC | VHDL/Verilog/ SystemC | 2013 | All | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
In Use | U. Cambridge | Academic | C# | Verilog | 2008 | .NET | No | Yes | Yes | |
In Use | CHiMPS | U. Washington | Academic | C | VHDL | 2008 | All | No | No | No |
In Use | gcc2verilog | U. Korea | Academic | C | Verilog | 2011 | All | No | No | No |
In Use | Ajax Compilers | Commercial | C/NAC | VHDL | 2012 | All | Yes | Yes | Yes | |
In Use | U. Illinois | Academic | C | Verilog | 2013 | All | Yes | ? | ? | |
In Use | Trident | Los Alamos NL | Academic | C subset | VHDL | 2007 | Scientific | No | Yes | No |
Aban- doned | AccelDSP | Xilinx | Commercial | MATLAB | VHDL/Verilog | 2006 | DSP | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Aban- doned | C2H | Altera | Commercial | C | VHDL/Verilog | 2006 | All | No | No | No |
Aban- doned | CtoVerilog | U. Haifa | Academic | C | Verilog | 2008 | All | No | No | No |
Aban- doned | DEFACTO | U. South Cailf. | Academic | C | RTL | 1999 | DSE | No | No | No |
Aban- doned | Garp | U. Berkeley | Academic | C subset | bitstream | 2000 | Loop | No | No | No |
Aban- doned | MATCH | U. Northwest | Academic | MATLAB | VHDL | 2000 | Image | No | No | No |
Aban- doned | Napa-C | Sarnoff Corp. | Academic | C subset | VHDL/Verilog | 1998 | Loop | No | No | No |
Aban- doned | PipeRench | U.Carnegie M. | Academic | DIL | bistream | 2000 | Stream | No | No | No |
Aban- doned | SA-C | U. Colorado | Academic | SA-C | VHDL | 2003 | Image | No | No | No |
Aban- doned | SeaCucumber | U. Brigham Y. | Academic | Java | EDIF | 2002 | All | No | Yes | Yes |
Aban- doned | SPARK | U. Cal. Irvine | Academic | C | VHDL | 2003 | Control | No | No | No |
- MATLAB HDL Coder from Mathworks
- HLS-QSP from CircuitSutra Technologies
- C-to-Silicon from Cadence Design Systems
- Concurrent Acceleration from Concurrent EDA
- Symphony C Compiler from Synopsys
- QuickPlay from PLDA
- PowerOpt from ChipVision
- Cynthesizer from Forte Design Systems, acquired by Cadence Design Systems on 2014, February 14
- Catapult C from Calypto Design Systems, part of Mentor Graphics as of 2015, September 16
- CyberWorkBench from NEC
- Mega Hardware
- C2R from CebaTech
- CoDeveloper from Impulse Accelerated Technologies
- HercuLeS by Nikolaos Kavvadias
- PICO from Synfora, acquired by Synopsys in June 2010
- xPilot from University of California, Los Angeles
- Vsyn from vsyn.ru
- ngDesign from SynFlow