Isaac of Antioch, one of the stars of Syriac literature, is the reputed author of a large number of metrical homilies, many of which are distinguished by an originality and acumen rare among Syriac writers. The trustworthy Chronicle of Edessa gives his date as 451-452 ; and the Chronicle of Michael the Syrian makes him contemporary with Nonus, who became the 31st bishop of Edessa in 449. He is to be distinguished from Isaac of Nineveh, a Nestorian writer on the ascetic life who belongs to the second half of the 7th century. As to the identity and history of the author considerable difficulty has arisen. The statements of ancient writers, Eastern and Western, were collected by Assemani. According to these accounts Isaac flourished under Theodosius II, and was a native either of Amid or of Edessa. Several writers identify him with Isaac, the disciple of St. Ephraim, who is mentioned in the anonymous Life of that father; but according to the patriarch Bar Shushan, who made a collection of his homilies, his master was Ephraim's disciple Zenobius. He is supposed to have migrated to Antioch, and to have become abbot of one of the convents in its neighborhood. According to Zacharias Rhetor he visited Rome and other cities, and the chronicle of Pseudo-Dionysius of Tell-Mahr informs us that he composed poems on the secular games of 404, and wrote on the destruction of Rome by Alaric I in 410. He also commemorated the destruction of Antioch by an earthquake in 459, so that he must have lived till about 460. Unfortunately these poems have perished. When we examine the collection of homilies attributed to Isaac, a difficulty arises on two grounds.
The author of some of the poems is a fervent proponent of Chalcedonian orthodoxy, in other and more important homilies the doctrine is monophysite, even though Eutyches and Nestorius are equally condemned.
One of the monophysite homilies, the famous poem of 2136 lines on the parrot which uttered the Trisagion in the streets of Antioch, appears to have been written at Antioch after Peter the Fuller raised the dispute about the addition to the doxology of the wordsqui crucifixus es pro nobis. It is therefore scarcely possible that the author of this homily should be the same who composed the lost poems on the secular games in 404 and on the sack of Rome.
Moreover, T. J. Lamy and Bedjan have called attention to statements made by Jacob of Edessa in a letter to John the Stylite. He says there were three Isaacs who wrote in Syriac, two Monophysite and one Chalcedonian:
The first, he says, a native of Amid, and pupil of S. Ephraim, visited Rome in the time of Arcadius, on his return journey suffered imprisonment at Constantinople, and afterwards became a priest in the church of Amid.
The second was a priest of Edessa, and flourished in the reign of Zeno. He went up to Antioch in the time of Peter the Fuller. Jacob then tells the story of the parrot.
The third was also an Edessene. At first in the days of Bishop Paul he was monophysite, but afterwards in the time of the Chalcedonian bishop Asclepius he wrote poems setting forth "Nestorian" doctrine.
With such conflicting evidence it is impossible to arrive at a certain result. But Jacob is an early witness: and on the whole it seems safe to concltide with Bedjan that works by at least two authors have been included in the collection attributed to Isaac of Antioch. Still the majority of the poems are the work of one hand the 5th-century monophysite who wrote the poem on the parrot. A full listi of the 191 poems existing in European MSS. is given by Bickell, who copied out 181 with a view to publishing them all: the other 10 had been previously copied by Pius Zingerle. But the two volumes published by Bickell in his lifetime contain only 37 homilies. Bedjan's edition, of which the first volume has alone appeared contains 67 poems, viz. 24 previously published, and 43 that are new, though their titles are all included in Bickells list. The writer's main interest lies in the application of religion to the practical duties of life, whether in the church or in the world. He has a great command of forcible language and considerable skill in apt illustration. The zeal with which he denounces the abuses prevalent in the church of his day, and particularly in the monastic orders, is not unlike that of the Protestant reformers. He shows acquaintance with many phases of life. He describes the corruption of judges, the prevalence of usury and avarice, the unchastity which especially characterized the upper classes, and the general hypocrisy of so-called Christians. His doctrinal discussions are apt to be diffuse; but he seldom loses sight of the bearing of doctrine on practical life. He judges with extreme severity those who argue about religion while neglecting its practice, and those who though stupid and ignorant dare to pry into mysteries which are sealed to the angels. "Not newly have we found Him, that we should search and pry into God. As He was He is: He changeth not with the times.... Confess that He formed thee of dust: search not the mode of His being: Worship Him that He redeemed thee by His only Son: inquire not the manner of His birth." Some of Isaac's works have an interest for the historian of the 5th century. In two poems, written probably at Edessa, he commemorates the capture of Beth-Uur, a city near Nisibis, by the Arabs. Although the historical allusions are far from clear, we gather that Beth-UUr, which in zealous paganism had been a successor to Uaran, had been in earlier days devastated by the Persians; but for the last 34 years the Persians had themselves suffered subjection. And now had come a flood of Arab invaders, sons of Hagar, who had swept away the city and carried all its inhabitants captive. From these two poems, and from the 2nd homily on Fasting we gain a vivid picture of the miseries borne by the inhabitants of that frontier region during the wars between Persia and the Romano-Greek empire. There are also instructive references to the heathen practices and the worship of pagan deities prevalent in Mesopotamia. Two other poems, written probably at Antioch, describe the prevalence of sorcery and the extraordinary influence possessed by Chaldeans and enchanters over women who were nominally Christians. The date of Isaac of Nineveh is now known from the Liber fundatorum of Ish-dlnah, an 8th-century writer; see Bedjan's edition, and Chabot, Livre de la chastete, p. 63. Assemani had placed him late in the 6th century, and Chabot in the second half of the 5th. Lamy has pointed out that several of the poems are in certain MSS. attributed to Ephraim. Possibly the author of the orthodox poems was not named Isaac at all. Assemani's list of 104 poems is completely covered by Bickell's. The metre of all the published homilies is heptasyllabic.
