The centum-satem isogloss of the Indo-European language family relates to the different evolution of the dorsal consonants of Proto-Indo-European. In the standard reconstruction, three series of dorsals are recognised: In some branches, the palatals merged with the velars: PIE "tremble " became Latincupiō "desire" and "hundred" became Latin centum ; but "interrogative pronoun" became quō "how? where?". They are known as centum branches, named after the Latin word for hundred. In other branches, the labiovelars merged with the velars: PIE became Vedic Sanskritkopáyati "shaken" and became Avestankō "who?"; but became Avestan satəm. They are known as satem branches, after the Avestan word for hundred. Since the Balto-Slavic family, the Indo-Iranian family, and the other satem families are spoken in adjacent geographic regions, they can be grouped by an isogloss: a geographic line separating satem branches on one side from centum branches on the other.
North-Midland isogloss (American English)
A major isogloss in American English has been identified as the North-Midland isogloss, which demarcates numerous linguistic features, including the Northern Cities vowel shift: regions north of the line have the shift, while regions south of the line do not.
A feature of the ancient Northwest Semitic languages is w becoming yat the beginning of a word. Thus, in Proto-Semitic and subsequent non-Northwest Semitic languages and dialects, the root letters for a word for "child" were w-l-d. However, in the ancient Northwest Semitic languages, the word was y-l-d, with w- > y-. Similarly, Proto-Semitic ā becomes ō in the Canaanite dialects of Northwest Semitic. Within the Aramaic languages and dialects of Northwest Semitic, the historic ā is preserved. Thus, an ancient Northwest Semitic language whose historic ā became ō can be classed as part of the Canaanite branch of Northwest Semitic. Such features can be used as data of fundamental importance for the purposes of linguistic classification.
Isographs
Just as there are distinguishing features of related languages, there are also distinguishing features of related scripts. For example, a distinguishing feature of the Iron Age Old Hebrew script is that the letters bet, dalet, 'ayin and resh do not have an open head, but contemporary Aramaic has open-headed forms. Similarly, the bet of Old Hebrew has a distinctive stance, but the bet of the Aramaic and Phoenician scripts series has a different stance. In 2006, Christopher Rollston suggested using the term isograph to designate a feature of the script that distinguishes it from a related script series, such as a feature that distinguishes the script of Old Hebrew from Old Aramaic and Phoenician.
Etymology
The term isogloss is inspired by contour lines, or isopleths, such as isobars. However, the isogloss separates rather than connects points. Consequently, it has been proposed for the term heterogloss to be used instead.