Joseph ben Abraham Gikatilla
Joseph ben Abraham Gikatilla was a Spanish kabbalist, student of Abraham Abulafia.
Biography
Born at Medinaceli, Old Castile, Gikatilla was for some time a pupil of the kabbalist Abraham Abulafia, by whom he is highly praised; his kabbalistic knowledge became so profound that he was supposed to be able to work miracles, and on this account was called "Joseph Ba'al ha-Nissim"... Like his master, Gikatilla occupied himself with mystic combinations and transpositions of letters and numbers; indeed, Abulafia considered him as the continuator of his school. But Gikatilla was not an adversary of philosophy; on the contrary, he tried to reconcile philosophy with kabbalah, declaring that the latter is the foundation of the former. He, however, strove after the higher science, that is, mysticism. His works in general represent a progressive development of philosophical insight into mysticism. His first work shows that he had considerable knowledge of secular sciences, and that he was familiar with the works of Ibn Gabirol, Ibn Ezra, Maimonides, and others. He died at Peñafiel after 1305.In different manuscripts of the work the author's name is variously written "Gribzul," "Karnitol," and "Necatil," all corruptions of "Gikatilla."
Works
''Ginnat Egoz''
Gikatilla was a prolific writer; he wrote his first work when only twenty-six.It is a kabbalistic treatise in three parts.
- The title. It literally means "garden of nuts,". Kabalisitically, "Ginnat" consisting of the initials of "Gemaṭria," "Noṭariḳon," "Temurah", the three main elements of Kabbala, while "Egoz" is the emblem of mysticism.
- The first part, in five chapters, treats of the various names of God occurring in the Bible. According to Gikatilla, "YHVH" is the only name which represents the substance of God; the other names are merely predicates of the divine attributes. "YHVH" stands for God as He is, while "Elohim" denotes God as the creative power. The name "ẓeba'ot", he says, applies to all the beings of the three natures, earthly, heavenly, and spirits. The interpretation of "ẓeba'ot" as leads him over to the second part.
- The second part treats of the letters of the alphabet. He declares that the number ten emanated from YHVH, the primitive cause, and is the source of all being; he attempts to prove his statement by different combinations based on religion, philosophy, physics, and mysticism. He shows that the Talmudic view that space is filled with spirits agrees with the belief of the philosophers that there is no vacuum. He also treats here of the revolutions of the sun and moon, giving the relative sizes of the planets.
- The third part is a treatise, in four chapters, on the vowels. The three primitive vowels, "ḥolem," "shuruḳ," and "ḥiriḳ," represent the upper, middle, and lower worlds; the three compound ones, "ẓere," "segol," and "shewa," represent the composition or the construction of the worlds; the "pataḥ" and "ḳameẓ" represent their movements.
Ginnat Egoz has been translated and adapted into English as
''Sha'are Orah''
Sha'are Orah, or Sefer ha-Orah, is Gikatilla's most influential work. The Arizal call it "a key to understanding the mystical studies". The Vilna Gaon and Zundel Salant recommended that their students study it. Among those who quote it are: Moshe Cordevero, Joseph Caro, Chaim Vital, the Shelah ha-Kadosh, the Sefat Emet, Shem Tov ibn Shem Tov, Moses al-Ashkar, and Judah Hayyat, and long extracts from it are inserted by Reuben ben Hoshke in his Yalḳuṭ Reubeni. It was translated into Latin by Paul Ricius and used by Reuchlin as a defense against his adversaries.Contents and Style
Sha'are Orah deals with the names of God.- It discusses 300 names, organized into ten chapters, one for each sephirah. Each sephirah has one main name, but may have many others. Some names are associated with more than one sphirah.
- The purpose of the book is "so that you can understand and experience the 'fountain of living waters' that flows from all his names, and when you attain this 'then you will prosper and have good success' ".
Sephirah | Holy Name |
כתר, Keter, "Crown" | אהי"ה, Eheye, "I AM" |
חכמה, Chokhmah, "Wisdom" | יה, Yah, "LORD" |
בינה, Binah, "Understanding" | יהו"ה, Havayah, "LORD" |
חסד, Chesed, "Kindness" | אל, El, "God" |
גבורה, Gevurah, "Severity" | אלהים, Elohim, "God" |
תפארת, Tiferet, "Beauty" | יהו"ה, Havayah, "LORD" |
נצח, Netzach, "Eternity" | יהו"ה צבאות, Havayah Tsevaot, "LORD of hosts" |
הוד, Hod, "Splendor" | אלהים צבאות, Elohim Tsevaot, "God of hosts" |
יסוד, Yesod, "Foundation" | אל חי, El Chai, "the living God" |
מלכות, Malkuth, "Kingship" | אדני, Adonai, "my Lord" |
Gikatilla takes an attitude somewhat hostile to philosophy. He quotes only the Sefer Yeẓirah and the Pirḳe Hekalot,.
Other works
- Sha'are Ẓedeḳ, or Sha'ar ha-Shamayim, another treatise by Gikatilla on the ten spheres.
- Sefer ha-Niḳḳud, a mystical explanation of the vowel-points, included with the Arze Lebanon ;
- Sod ha-Ḥashmal, a kabbalistic commentary on the vision of Ezekiel, also printed with the Arze Lebanon;
- Ẓofnat Pa'aneaḥ, commentary on the Pesaḥ Haggadah ;
- Sodot ha-Miẓwot, a kabbalistic explanation of the commandments;
- Iggeret, kabbalistic essays ;
- Teshubot, responsa;
- Sha'ar Meshalim, a kabbalistic essay in 138 paragraphs;
- Oẓar ha-Kavod, according to Jellinek, the same as the Sodot ha-Miẓwot, a commentary on Canticles.
- Hassagot consists of strictures on the Moreh, Gikatilla used Al-Ḥarizi's translation, in which he corrects many mistakes and sometimes differs from Maimonides. It seems that he wrote the Hassagot in the beginning of his literary career, when he was more of a philosopher and less of a mystic.
- Jellinek thinks that Gikatilla composed a kabbalistic treatise entitled Hekalot of the same character as the Pirḳe Hekalot.
Jewish Encyclopedia bibliography
- Adolf Jellinek, Beiträge zur Gesch. der Kabbala, ii.61 et seq.;
- Zunz, Additamenta, pp. 320–321;
- Cassel, in Ersch and Gruber, Encyc. section ii, part 31, pp. 76–80;
- S. Sachs, in Ha-Yonah, p. 80;
- M. H. Landauer, in Litteraturblatt des Orients, vi.227-228;
- Eliakim Carmoly, Itinéraires, p. 276;
- Heinrich Grätz, Gesch. 3d ed., pp. 194, 198;
- Moritz Steinschneider, Cat. Bodl. cols. 1461–1470.