Latin tenses


Latin grammarians generally present Latin as having six main tenses, three non-perfect or īnfectum tenses and three corresponding perfect or perfectum tenses. These six tenses are made using two different stems: for example, from the verb faciō 'I do' the three non-perfect tenses are faciō, faciam, faciēbam and the three perfect tenses are fēcī, fēcerō, fēceram.
In addition to these six tenses of the indicative mood, there are four tenses in the subjunctive mood: present, imperfect, perfect, and pluperfect. To these can be added various 'periphrastic' tenses, consisting of a future participle and part of the verb sum, for example factūrus sum 'I am going to do'.
Because Latin verbal groups do not have perfect English equivalents, it is often the case that the same word can be translated in different ways depending on its context: for example, faciō can be translated as 'I did', 'I do', and 'I am doing', and fēcī can be translated as 'I have done' and 'I did'. However, occasionally Latin makes a distinction which is not made in English: for example, fuī and eram both mean 'I was' in English, but they differ in Latin.
Participles in Latin have three tenses and the imperative mood has two tenses. The infinitive has two main tenses and a number of periphrastic tenses used in reported speech.
For the most part the use of tenses in Latin is straightforward, but there are certain idioms where Latin and English use different tenses. For example, in future conditions of the type 'if anything happens, I will tell you', English uses the present tense in the subordinate clause, but Latin has the future perfect tense.
In some cases the use of tenses can be understood in terms of transformations of one tense or mood into another, especially in indirect speech. For example, in indirect questions, a present indicative of direct speech, such as est 'is', is changed first from indicative to subjunctive mood, and then, if the context is past, from the present to the imperfect tense. Another very common transformation is for the main verb in an indirect statement to be changed into the closest tense of the infinitive, so that the present tense est changes to the present infinitive esse, and the imperfect erat 'he was' and perfect fuit 'he was' both change to the perfect infinitive fuisse.

Formation of the tenses

Latin has six main tenses in the indicative mood, and four in the subjunctive mood. These are illustrated below using a 1st conjugation verb, amō 'I love', a 2nd conjugation verb moneō 'I advise', a 3rd conjugation verb, dūcō 'I lead', and a 4th conjugation verb, audiō 'I hear'.
Also shown on the table are the tenses of the common irregular verbs sum 'I am', possum 'I am able', volō 'I want' and eō 'I go'.
PresentFutureImperfectPerfectFuture PerfectPluperfect
ACTIVEI loveI will loveI was lovingI lovedI will have lovedI had loved
I
you sg.
he/she
we
you pl.
they
amō
amās
amat
amāmus
amātis
amant
amābō
amābis
amābit
amābimus
amābitis
amābunt
amābam
amābās
amābat
amābāmus
amābātis
amābant
amāvī
amāvistī
amāvit
amāvimus
amāvistis
amāvērunt/-ēre
amāverō
amāverīs
amāverit
amāverīmus
amāverītis
amāverint
amāveram
amāverās
amāverat
amāverāmus
amāverātis
amāverant
Subjunctiveamem
amēs
amet
amēmus
amētis
ament
amārem
amārēs
amāret
amārēmus
amārētis
amārent
amāverim
amāverīs
amāverit
amāverīmus
amāverītis
amāverint
amāssem
amāssēs
amāsset
amāssēmus
amāssētis
amāssent
PASSIVEI am lovedI will be lovedI was being
loved
I was lovedI will have
been loved
I had been loved
Indicativeamor
amāris
amātur
amāmur
amāminī
amāntur
amābor
amāberis
amābitur
amābimur
amābiminī
amābuntur
amābar
amābāris
amābātur
amābāmur
amābāminī
amābantur
amātus sum
amātus es
amātus est
amātī sumus
amātī estis
amātī sunt
amātus erō
amātus eris
amātus erit
amātī erimus
amātī eritis
amātī erunt
amātus eram
amātus erās
amātus erat
amātī erāmus
amātī erātis
amātī erant
Subjunctiveamer
amēris
amētur
amēmur
amēminī
amentur
amārer
amārēris
amārētur
amārēmur
amārēminī
amārentur
amātus sim
amātus sīs
amātus sit
amātī sīmus
amātī sītis
amātī sint
amātus essem
amātus essēs
amātus esset
amātī essēmus
amātī essētis
amātī essent
ACTIVEI adviseI will adviseI was advisingI advisedI will have
advised
I had advised
Indicativemoneō
monēs
monet
monēmus
monitis
monent
monēbō
monēbis
monēbit
monēbimus
monēbitis
monēbunt
monēbam
monēbās
monēbat
monēbāmus
monēbātis
monēbant
monuī
monuistī
monuit
monuimus
monuistis
monuērunt/-ēre
monuerō
monuerīs
monuerit
monuerīmus
monuerītis
monuerint
monueram
monuerās
monuerat
monuerāmus
monuerātis
monuerant
Subjunctivemoneam
moneās
moneat
moneāmus
moneātis
moneant
monērem
monērēs
monēret
monērēmus
monērētis
monērent
monuerim
monuerīs
monuerit
monuerīmus
monuerītis
monuerint
monuissem
monuissēs
monuisset
monuissēmus
monuissētis
monuissent
PASSIVEI am advisedI will be
advised
I was being
advised
I was advisedI will have
been advised
I had been
advised
Indicativemoneor
monēris
monētur
monēmur
monēminī
monēntur
monēbor
monēberis
monēbitur
monēbimur
monēbiminī
monēbuntur
monēbar
monēbāris
monēbātur
monēbāmur
monēbāminī
monēbantur
monitus sum
monitus es
monitus est
monitī sumus
monitī estis
monitī sunt
monitus erō
monitus eris
monitus erit
monitī erimus
monitī eritis
monitī erunt
monitus eram
monitus erās
monitus erat
monitī erāmus
monitī erātis
monitī erant
Subjunctivemonear
moneāris
moneātur
moneāmur
moneāminī
moneantur
monērer
monērēris
monērētur
monērēmur
monērēminī
monērentur
monitus sim
monitus sīs
monitus sit
monitī sīmus
monitī sītis
monitī sint
monitus essem
monitus essēs
monitus esset
monitī essēmus
monitī essētis
monitī essent
ACTIVEI leadI will leadI was leadingI ledI will have ledI had led
Indicativedūcō
dūcis
dūcit
dūcimus
dūcitis
dūcunt
dūcam
dūcēs
dūcet
dūcēmus
dūcētis
dūcent
dūcēbam
dūcēbās
dūcēbat
dūcēbāmus
dūcēbātis
dūcēbant
dūxī
dūxistī
dūxit
dūximus
dūxistis
dūxērunt/-ēre
dūxerō
dūxerīs
dūxerit
dūxerīmus
dūxerītis
dūxerint
dūxeram
dūxerās
dūxerat
dūxerāmus
dūxerātis
dūxerant
Subjunctivedūcam
dūcās
dūcat
dūcāmus
dūcātis
dūcant
dūcerem
dūcerēs
dūceret
dūcerēmus
dūcerētis
dūcerent
dūxerim
dūxerīs
dūxerit
dūxerīmus
dūxerītis
dūxerint
dūxissem
dūxissēs
dūxisset
dūxissēmus
dūxissētis
dūxissent
PASSIVEI am ledI will be ledI was being
led
I was ledI will have
been led
I had been led
Indicativedūcor
dūceris
dūcitur
dūcimur
dūciminī
dūcuntur
dūcar
dūcēris
dūcētur
dūcēmur
dūcēminī
dūcentur
dūcēbar
dūcēbāris
dūcēbātur
dūcēbāmur
dūcēbāminī
dūcēbantur
ductus sum
ductus es
ductus est
ductī sumus
ductī estis
ductī sunt
ductus erō
ductus eris
ductus erit
ductī erimus
dūctī eritis
ductī erunt
ductus eram
ductus erās
ductus erat
ductī erāmus
ductī erātis
ductī erant
Subjunctivedūcar
dūcāris
dūcātur
dūcāmur
dūcāminī
dūcantur
dūcerer
dūcerēris
dūcerētur
dūcerēmur
dūcerēminī
dūcerentur
ductus sim
ductus sīs
ductus sit
ductī sīmus
ductī sītis
ductī sint
ductus essem
ductus essēs
ductus esset
ductī essēmus
ductī essētis
ductī essent
ACTIVEI hearI will hearI was hearingI heardI will have heardI had heard
Indicativeaudiō
audīs
audit
audīmus
audītis
audiunt
audiam
audiēs
audiet
audiēmus
audiētis
audient
audiēbam
audiēbās
audiēbat
audiēbāmus
audiēbātis
audiēbant
audīvī
audīstī
audīvit
audīvimus
audīstis
audiērunt/-ēre
audierō
audierīs
audierit
audierīmus
audierītis
audierint
audieram
audierās
audierat
audierāmus
audierātis
audierant
Subjunctiveaudiam
audiās
audiat
audiāmus
audiātis
audiant
audīrem
audīrēs
audīret
audīrēmus
audīrētis
audīrent
audierim
audierīs
audierit
audierīmus
audierītis
audierint
audīssem
audīssēs
audīsset
audīssēmus
audīssētis
audīssent
PASSIVEI am heardI will be heardI was being
heard
I was heardI will have
been heard
I had been heard
Indicativeaudior
audīris
audītur
audīmur
audīminī
audiuntur
audiar
audiēris
audiētur
audiēmur
audiēminī
audientur
audiēbar
audiēbāris
audiēbātur
audiēbāmur
audiēbāminī
audiēbantur
audītus sum
audītus es
audītus est
audītī sumus
audītī estis
audītī sunt
audītus erō
audītus eris
audītus erit
audītī erimus
audītī eritis
audītī erunt
audītus eram
audītus erās
audītus erat
audītī erāmus
audītī erātis
audītī erant
Subjunctiveaudiar
audiāris
audiātur
audiāmur
audiāminī
audiantur
audīrer
audīrēris
audīrētur
audīrēmur
audīrēminī
audīrentur
audītus sim
audītus sīs
audītus sit
audītī sīmus
audītī sītis
audītī sint
audītus essem
audītus essēs
audītus esset
audītī essēmus
audītī essētis
audītī essent
TO BEI amI will beI wasI was/have beenI will have beenI had been
Indicativesum
es
est
sumus
estis
sunt
erō
eris
erit
erimus
eritis
erunt
eram
erās
erat
erāmus
erātis
erant
fuī
fuistī
fuit
fuimus
fuistis
fuērunt/fuēre
fuerō
fuerīs
fuerit
fuerīmus
fuerītis
fuerint
fueram
fuerās
fuerat
fuerāmus
fuerātis
fuerant
Subjunctivesim
sīs
sit
sīmus
sītis
sint
essem
essēs
esset
essēmus
essētis
essent
fuerim
fuerīs
fuerit
fuerīmus
fuerītis
fuerint
fuissem
fuissēs
fuisset
fuissēmus
fuissētis
fuissent
TO BE
ABLE
I am ableI will be ableI was ableI was able/
have been able
I will have
been able
I had been able
Indicativepossum
potes
potest
possumus
potestis
possunt
poterō
poteris
poterit
poterimus
poteritis
poterunt
poteram
poterās
poterat
poterāmus
poterātis
poterant
potuī
potuistī
potuit
potuimus
potuistis
potuērunt/-ēre
potuerō
potuerīs
potuerit
potuerīmus
potuerītis
potuerint
potueram
potuerās
potuerat
potuerāmus
potuerātis
potuerant
Subjunctivepossim
possīs
possit
possīmus
possītis
possint
possem
possēs
posset
possēmus
possētis
possent
potuerim
potuerīs
potuerit
potuerīmus
potuerītis
potuerint
potuissem
potuissēs
potuisset
potuissēmus
potuissētis
potuissent
TO WANTI wantI will wantI was wantingI wantedI will have wantedI had wanted
Indicativevolō
vīs
vult
volumus
vultis
volunt
volam
volēs
volet
volēmus
volētis
volent
volēbam
volēbās
volēbat
volēbāmus
volēbātis
volēbant
voluī
voluistī
voluit
voluimus
voluistis
voluērunt/-ēre
voluerō
voluerīs
voluerit
voluerīmus
voluerītis
voluerint
volueram
voluerās
voluerat
voluerāmus
voluerātis
voluerant
Subjunctivevelim
velīs
velit
velīmus
velītis
velint
vellem
vellēs
vellet
vellēmus
vellētis
vellent
voluerim
voluerīs
voluerit
voluerīmus
voluerītis
voluerint
voluissem
voluissēs
voluisset
voluissēmus
voluissētis
voluissent
TO GOI goI will goI was goingI wentI will have goneI had gone
Indicative
īs
it
īmus
ītis
eunt
ībō
ībis
ībit
ībimus
ībitis
ībunt
ībam
ībās
ībat
ībāmus
ībātis
ībant
iī/īvī
iistī
iit
iimus
iistis
iērunt/iēre
ierō
ierīs
ierit
ierīmus
ierītis
ierint
ieram
ierās
ierat
ierāmus
ierātis
ierant
Subjunctiveeam
eās
eat
eāmus
eātis
eant
īrem
īrēs
īret
īrēmus
īrētis
īrent
ierim
ierīs
ierit
ierīmus
ierītis
ierint
īssem
īssēs
īsset
īssēmus
īssētis
īssent

In technical language, the first three tenses are known as the īnfectum tenses, while the three perfect tenses are known as perfectum. The three perfect tenses are formed using a different stem.

Future tenses

There are three ways of forming the future tense in Latin: -bō, -bis, -bit -am, -ēs, -et ; and erō, eris, erit.

Future perfect endings

In early Latin the future perfect had a short i in the persons -eris, -erimus, -eritis, while the perfect subjunctive had a long i: -erīs, -erīmus, -erītis. But Catullus pronounced the future perfect with a long i. Virgil has a short i for both tenses; Horace uses both forms for both tenses; Ovid uses both forms for the future perfect, but a long i in the perfect subjunctive.

Perfect passive tenses

The perfect tense passive is formed periphrastically using a perfect participle and the verb sum. The participle changes according to gender and number: ducta est 'she was led', ductae sunt ' were led' etc. The perfect tense of deponent verbs is formed in the same way.
The order of the participle and auxiliary is sometimes reversed: sunt ductī. When negative there are various possibilities: nōn est ausus, ausus nōn est, nōn ausus est 'he did not dare' all commonly occur.
A perfect participle used as part of the perfect tense passive should be distinguished from one which is merely an adjective, as in the following sentence:
Here the meaning of est dīvīsa is not 'was divided' or 'has been divided' but the participle is simply descriptive.

Perfects made with and

Perfect tenses can also be formed occasionally using fuī instead of sum, for example oblītus fuī 'I forgot', and habuī e.g. ductum habuī 'I have led'. For the meaning of these see below.

Shortened endings

The 2nd person singular passive endings are often shortened by changing -is to -e, e.g. dūcēbāre for dūcēbāris 'you were being led'.
The 3rd person plural perfect indicative can also be shortened: dūxēre for dūxērunt 'they led'. The shortened form of the perfect is common in poetry, but is also sometimes found in prose.

Meanings of the indicative tenses

Present indicative

There is no distinction of aspect in the present tense: faciō can mean 'I do ', 'I do, or 'I am doing'; that is, it can be perfective, habitual, or progressive in aspect.

Current situation

The present tense can refer to a current situation:

Habitual

The present tense can be used for habitual actions:

General truths

The present, as in English, can also describe a general truth:

Perfective present

It can also be used performatively to describe an event which takes place at the moment of speaking:

Historic present

The present tense is often used in narrative in a historic sense, referring to a past event, especially when the writer is describing an exciting moment in the story. This is known as the 'historic present':
According to Pinkster, the historic present is the most frequent tense used in narrative in both prose and poetry. It can replace not only the perfect tense, but also the imperfect tense:
After dum 'while', the present indicative also has the meaning of an imperfect tense:
In Caesar when a verb is placed initially in the sentence, as in the first example above, it is very frequently in the present tense.
Another situation where the use of the historic present is frequent is in utterance verbs, such as fidem dant 'they give a pledge' or ōrant 'they beg'. More than half the historic presents in Caesar are of this kind.

Perfect continuous meaning

The present can sometimes mean 'has been doing', referring to a situation that started in the past and is still continuing. In some sentences a length of time is given and the adverb iam 'now' is added:
The present tense can also be used in this meaning when combined with a temporal clause using postquam:
Sometimes the postquam clause itself has the present tense:
Another idiom is the following using the conjunction cum:

Another idiom that can be mentioned is the phrase longum est, which means 'it would take a long time' or 'it would be tedious'. It is frequently used by Cicero as well as other writers:

Future indicative

Future event or situation

The future tense can describe an event or a situation in the near or distant future:
There is no distinction in the future between perfective and imperfective aspect.

Future in subordinate clauses

After cum 'when' or sī 'if' or other subordinate clauses referring to a future time, usually the future is used where English has a present tense. The simple future, not the future perfect, is used if the time of the two verbs is simultaneous:

Polite requests

The future can also be used for polite requests, as when Cicero sends greetings to his friend Atticus's wife and daughter:

Imperfect indicative

The imperfect indicative generally has an imperfective meaning and describes situations in the past. Often the imperfect can be translated into English as 'was doing', but sometimes the simple tense 'did' or expressions such as 'used to do', 'would do', 'kept doing', 'began to do', 'had been doing' are more appropriate.

Habitual use

The imperfect tense can describe a situation that used to take place regularly or habitually:

Iterative use

Similar to the above is the iterative or 'frequentative' use of the imperfect, describing what something that kept on happening or which happened on an indefinite number of occasions:

Situation at a particular time

It can also describe a situation that existed at a particular moment:
Often an expression such as tum 'then' or eō tempore 'at that time' is added:

Vivid description

The use of the imperfect rather than the perfect can be used to make a scene more vivid, as with this sentence of Cicero's:
The passage is commented on by Aulus Gellius. He says that the use of caedēbātur rather than caesus est creates a 'drawn-out vivid description' ; that is to say, making it seem to the audience that the scene is taking place in front of them.

Geographical description

Sometimes the imperfect is used for description of the surroundings:

Unfinished action

Another use is to describe an action that someone was intending to do, or about to do, but which never actually took place, or which was interrupted by another event:

'Began doing'

Another meaning is inceptive, describing a situation that began at a certain moment and continued indefinitely:

Pluperfect continuous meaning

When the imperfect tense is used with the adverb iam 'now' and a length of time it means 'had been doing':

Epistolary imperfect

Sometimes in letters a writer imagines himself in the position of the recipient and uses a past tense to describe an event which for the writer himself is present:

Potential meaning ('would be')

Sometimes the imperfect of sum is used with a potential meaning :

Perfect indicative

Past event

The perfect most frequently narrates an event in the past. The usual translation is the simple English past tense with '-ed' or the equivalent:

Present perfect meaning

The perfect can also be used like the English present perfect :

Experiential perfect

As with the English perfect, the Latin perfect can sometimes be used to relate experiences which have happened several times in the past:
Similar to this is the 'gnomic perfect', which states a general truth based on past experience:

Iterative action

In sentences which mean 'whenever X occurs, Y occurs', referring to general time, the perfect tense is used for event X if it precedes event Y. In English the present tense is often used:

Length of time

The perfect, not the imperfect, is used when a situation is said to have lasted in the past for a certain length of time, but is now over:
Exceptions to this rule are very rare, but they do occur, for example the following, which describes an ongoing unfinished situation:
Similarly the perfect is used for a situation which has always existed and still exists:

''Eram'' and ''fuī''

Both of these in English mean 'I was', but in Latin there is usually a difference. As with other verbs, the perfect is usually used when the length of time is mentioned:
The perfect is also used when the sentence describes an event rather than a situation:
However, the perfect fuī 'I was once', 'I used to be' is sometimes used to describe a former situation, emphasising that it is no longer in existence:
The perfect is also used in sentences such as the following, which describe a permanent state, as opposed to the imperfect, which describes a temporary one:
According to Pinkster, the use of erat in these two examples would sound wrong. 'In both cases the reader would want to know "What happened next?"'
The perfect must also be used with adverbs such as semel 'once', bis 'twice', ter 'three times', which imply that the situation is now over:
For geographical description, erat is used:
There are also some types of sentences where either tense may be used indifferently, for example when describing someone's name or character:
The equivalent of these two tenses, era and fui both meaning 'I was', still exist in Spanish and Portuguese today.

''Meminī'', ''ōdī'', ''nōvī''

Certain verbs, of which the most common are meminī 'I remember', ōdī 'I hate', and nōvī 'I know', are used in the perfect tense but have the meaning of a present tense:
The future perfect and pluperfect of these verbs serve as the equivalent of a future or imperfect tense: meminerō 'I will remember', memineram 'I remembered'. meminī has an imperative mementō 'remember!'
The verb nōvī usually means 'I know' but sometimes it has a past meaning 'I became acquainted with':
The perfect of cōnsuēscō, cōnsuēvī 'I have grown accustomed', is also often used with a present meaning:

Perfect with

Occasionally the beginnings can be seen of a perfect tense formed with habeo and the perfect participle, which became the regular way of forming the perfect in French and Italian:
According to Gildersleeve and Lodge, this form of the perfect 'is not a mere circumlocution for the Perfect, but lays particular stress on the maintenance of the result'.
In later Latin this construction became more common, for example:
A variation with teneō 'I hold or keep' is also sometimes found, but usually with emphasis on the idea of holding:
A pluperfect can similarly be made using one of the past tenses of habeō:

Perfect passive with ''fuī''

Normally the perfect passive tenses are formed with sum, erō, and eram. Occasionally, however, they can be formed with fuī, for example captus fuī, captus fuerō, captus fueram.
In these examples, the fact that the verb with fuit in each case refers to an earlier state than the verb with est is clearly a factor in the choice of tense.
In authors from Livy onwards the pluperfect with fueram and future perfect with fuerō are sometimes loosely used for the normal pluperfect with eram and future perfect with erō:
In Plautus these tenses are used several times with the deponent verb oblīvīscor 'I forget':

Future perfect indicative

Independent use

The future perfect is usually used in a sentence with 'if' or 'when' referring to future time, but it can sometimes be used on its own, as in the following sentences:
Another famous passage with a future perfect is the call of the eagle-bearer to his men when their boat reached the shore of Britain in 55 BC:
There is also an idiom using the future perfect of videō, where the future perfect is almost equivalent to a command:

After ''sī'' and ''cum''

More frequently the future perfect tense is found after sī 'if' or cum 'when' in clauses referring to a future time. In such sentences English uses the present tense:

Future perfect of and

The future perfect of meminī and ōdī has a simple future meaning:

Pluperfect indicative

Prior event

The pluperfect can be used as in English to describe an event that had happened earlier than the time of the narrative:
Often, like the imperfect tense, the pluperfect can be used to describe the situation prevailing at a certain moment:

Iterative use

In subordinate clauses of the type 'whenever...', 'whoever...' etc. in past time the pluperfect indicative is used if the event precedes the event of the main clause. Usually in English the simple past is used:
In later writers such as Livy, the pluperfect subjunctive is used in a similar context.

Potential meaning ('would have')

Sometimes in a conditional clause a pluperfect indicative can have the meaning of a potential pluperfect subjunctive, when it refers to an event which very nearly took place, but did not:

Pluperfect of , ,

The pluperfect of ōdī, nōvī and meminī has the meaning of an imperfect:

Subjunctive mood

The subjunctive mood in Latin has four tenses, which are as shown below. Note that the meanings given here are only very approximate, since in fact each tense has a wide variety of meanings.
ActiveMeaningPassiveMeaning
Presentdūcam'I would/should/can lead'dūcar'I would/should be led'
Imperfectdūcerem'I would/should/could
lead/be leading'
dūcerer'I would be led'
Perfectdūxerim'I would/could have led'ductus sim'I would have been led'
Pluperfectdūxissem'I would/could/should have led'ductus essem'I would have been led'

For the subjunctive of other verbs, see the table at the beginning of this article.
The present subjunctive of 3rd conjugation verbs resembles the future in the 1st person singular, but in other persons it differs. The subjunctive goes dūcam, dūcās, dūcat... while the future indicative goes dūcam, dūcēs, dūcet...
There is no future subjunctive tense as such, although there is a periphrastic future subjunctive, which is used for example in indirect questions.
The present subjunctive of 1st conjugation verbs ends in -em, -ēs, -et, of conjugations 2, 3, and 4 in -am, -ās, -at, and of sum, possum, volō, nōlō, mālō in -im, -īs, -it.
The imperfect subjunctive of every active verb has the same form as the infinitive with the endings -em, -ēs etc.: amārem, vidērem, audīrem etc.
In 1st conjugation verbs, the ending -āvissem is frequently contracted to -āssem.

Present subjunctive

Potential

The present subjunctive can be potential or jussive. After the word fortasse perhaps, it can mean 'may', expressing a possibility:
It can also express a wish for the future :
A more usual translation for the potential subjunctive, however, is 'would'. In conditional sentences, the present subjunctive usually refers to some hypothetical situation in the future. This kind of conditional sentence is known as 'ideal':
In early Latin, a present subjunctive can also be used to make an unreal conditional referring to the present:
However, there was a gradual shift in usage, and in the classical period, and even sometimes in Plautus, the imperfect subjunctive is used in such clauses.

Historic potential

Sometimes in poetry a present subjunctive can be used to refer to a potential past event, where in prose a pluperfect subjunctive would be used in both halves of the sentence:

Generalising 2nd person

When a conditional sentence expresses a generalisation, the present subjunctive is used for any 2nd person singular verb, whether in the subordinate clause or the main clause: Thus, in the subordinate clause:
And in the main clause:

Jussive

When the subjunctive has a jussive meaning, it can be a suggestion or command in the 1st or 3rd person:
In philosophy it can set the scene for a discussion:
Another use is concessive:
The subjunctive is also used in deliberative questions :

In dependent clauses

The present subjunctive is also used in a great variety of subordinate clauses set in present time, such as purpose clauses, indirect commands, consecutive clauses, clauses of fearing, indirect questions, and others. In some of these constructions, it can often be translated simply as if it were an ordinary present indicative, such as after causal cum:
The subjunctive is also used in purpose clauses :
One of the most common uses of the subjunctive is to indicate reported speech. When a question is made indirect, the verb is always changed into the subjunctive mood. The present subjunctive can therefore represent what would be a present indicative if the question was direct:
In reported speech, the present subjunctive can also represent a present imperative or a jussive subjunctive. This type of construction is known as an indirect command:
After quīn, if the context is clearly future, a present subjunctive can sometimes represent a future tense or potential subjunctive:
Similarly in the protasis of a conditional sentence in indirect speech, a present subjunctive can represent an original future indicative:
In other examples in reported speech, the subjunctive in the 'if' clause represents an original present subjunctive with potential meaning:

Archaic subjunctives

In old Latin, a form of the subjunctive with -s-, known as the sigmatic aorist subjunctive, is preserved. This is used in wishes for the future:
In Plautus this subjunctive is also used in prohibitions, when it exists:
In some phrases it has a conditional meaning:
Another archaic subjunctive is siem for sim, which is very common in Plautus and Terence, but fell out of use later:
Less common is fuam, with the same meaning. This occurs occasionally in Plautus and also once in Lucretius and once in Virgil's Aeneid, where the archaic form is presumably appropriate for the speech of the god Jupiter:
Another old subjunctive is duim, from the verb dō 'I give'. It occurs mostly in Plautus and Terence, but sometimes also in Cicero, in phrases like the following:

Imperfect subjunctive

The imperfect indicative is always imperfective in aspect ; the imperfect subjunctive is also often imperfective in meaning. However, as the examples below show, it can also sometimes be perfective, in view of the fact that it often represents the transformation into past time of a present or future tense or an imperative.

Potential

The imperfect subjunctive is often used in wishes to represent an imagined or wished for situation impossible at the present time:
Similarly in unreal conditional sentences, the imperfect subjunctive represents a situation which is hypothetical or imaginary, referring to the present time:
In the following sentence, the imperfect subjunctive vellem is used to wish for something that cannot now come true, while the present subjunctive velim leaves open the possibility that it may be true:

Generalising 2nd person

The 2nd person imperfect subjunctive when potential is nearly always indefinite and generalising, i.e. an imaginary 'you':

Jussive

A rarer use of the imperfect subjunctive is the past jussive:
This usage is quite common in Plautus but rare in later Latin. The normal prose practice is to use either a past tense of dēbeō 'I have a duty to' or oportet 'it is proper' with the infinitive, or else a gerundive with a past tense of sum.
The imperfect subjunctive can also be used in deliberative questions, that is to say, questions asking for advice, in a past time context:

In dependent clauses

The imperfect subjunctive is very commonly found in past context dependent clauses, where it can represent the transformation of a present indicative or imperative. The following example contains an indirect command reflecting an imperative in direct speech:
Another very common use is the circumstantial cum-clause with the imperfect subjunctive. Here the imperfect subjunctive has the same meaning as an imperfect indicative would have if cum were omitted:
On the other hand, in result clauses after verbs meaning 'it happened that...', the imperfect subjunctive is always used even of a simple perfective action, which, if the grammatical construction did not require a subjunctive, would be expressed by a perfect indicative:
In indirect questions in a historic context, an imperfect subjunctive usually represents the transformation of a present indicative:
Similarly, in the following example after quīn, the imperfect subjunctive also represents the transformation of a present indicative:
However, when the context makes it clear that the reference is to the future, the imperfect subjunctive after quīn can have a prospective or future meaning:
An imperfect subjunctive can also have a prospective or future meaning after a verb of fearing or expecting:
It can also have a prospective or future meaning in a relative clause:
In the protasis of a conditional clause in indirect speech the imperfect subjunctive can similarly represent a future indicative:

Just as the verb sum 'I am' has a future infinitive fore, short for futūrum esse, so it also has a past-potential subjunctive forem, short for futūrus essem. This is not used in Caesar, but is common in Livy and Nepos. It is used especially in conditional sentences, either in the protasis or the apodosis, and it generally has a potential or future meaning.
One common use, in combination with a perfect passive participle, is with the meaning 'would have been' in past conditional sentences:
Another use is in indirect speech after sī 'if' as the equivalent of a future indicative in the original direct speech:
It can also be used with a future meaning in sentences like the following, which are not conditional:
With a perfect participle after sī or quī, foret + the perfect participle can represent a future perfect tense of a deponent or passive verb:
However, the same future perfect meaning can be expressed with a simple participle or by an ordinary pluperfect subjunctive:
In other sentences, however, it has no future meaning, merely potential, as in the following example, where it appears to be used simply for metrical convenience as the equivalent of esset in the second half:
Similarly in the following conditional clause, it has a past, not future, meaning:

Perfect subjunctive

Independent use

In wishes, the perfect subjunctive expresses a wish for the past, leaving open the possibility that it may have happened:
Sometimes the perfect subjunctive seems to refer to present or future time, and mean 'could'. For example, in the following idiom the perfect is usual:
In a conditional sentence it can mean 'would do':
In the following, it is the transference into hypothetical mood of a future perfect indicative, describing a future potential result:
In the following sentence both 'could' and 'could have' are possible:
In other examples the perfect subjunctive definitely refers to the past and means 'could have done' or 'would have done':
With the negative particle nē it can express a negative command. Here the subjunctive has a jussive use, not potential:

In dependent clauses

The perfect subjunctive is most commonly used in dependent clauses. Usually it represents what would be a perfect indicative in an independent clause. However, since there is no way of expressing an imperfect tense in primary sequence except using the perfect subjunctive, it could also sometimes represent an imperfect indicative. The perfect subjunctive is generally found when the main verb is one of the primary tenses. One common use is in indirect questions when the context is primary:
Verbs in subordinate clauses in indirect speech are also always in the subjunctive mood:
It can also be used after quīn, both after a primary and after a historic verb:
It can also be used in a result clause after a historic verb as in the following:
In the following sentence it is used after quī with a causal sense :
It can also follow quī in a restrictive clause:

Pluperfect subjunctive

Independent use

In independent sentences, the pluperfect subjunctive means 'would have done', 'might have done', could have done' or 'should have done'.
One common use is in conditional sentences, where the pluperfect subjunctive is used to express a hypothetical event in the past, which might have taken place, but did not. This usage is found as early as Plautus:
Another use, when it represents the transformation of the future perfect tense, is to describe a hypothetical event which is yet to take place:
It can also express a hypothetical event in the past which is wished for, but which did not take place:
In the following sentence Queen Dido contemplates what 'might have been':
Others see the pluperfect subjunctive in such sentences as a wish ; others again as jussive.
A more certain example of the jussive pluperfect is in the following example from Cicero, using the negative nē:

In dependent clauses

In dependent clauses, the most common meaning of the pluperfect subjunctive is 'had done'.
In a conditional clause it describes a hypothetical situation that didn't actually happen:
Another very frequent use of the pluperfect subjunctive is after cum in a temporal clause:
Another use is in indirect speech in a past-time context, where the pluperfect subjunctive is often a transformation of a perfect indicative in direct speech. In the following example, the original direct question would have had the perfect tense :
But in some sentences, the pluperfect subjunctive is a reflection of an original imperfect indicative, as in the following example, where the original verbs would have been mīlitābāmus and habēbāmus:
In other sentences, the pluperfect is a reflection of a future perfect indicative, put into historic sequence. The original words of the following sentence would presumably have been tū, sī aliter fēcerīs, iniūriam Caesarī faciēs 'if you do otherwise, you will be doing Caesar a disservice':

The imperative mood

The imperative mood has two tenses, present and future.

Present imperative

Positive commands

The present imperative mood is the normal tense used for giving direct orders which the speaker wishes to be carried out at once. The active form can be made plural by adding -te:
Deponent verbs such as proficīscor 'I set out' or sequor 'I follow' have an imperative ending in -re or -minī :

Negative commands

An imperative is usually made negative by using nōlī plus the infinitive:
However, in poetry an imperative can sometimes be made negative with the particle :
A negative order can also use the perfect subjunctive:
In later Latin, nē plus the present subjunctive became more common, for example in the Vulgate Bible. In the following example the first three verbs use the present subjunctive, and the third the perfect subjunctive:

Future imperative

Latin also has a Future imperative or 2nd imperative, ending in -tō, used to request someone to do something at a future time, or if something else happens first:
This imperative is very common in early writers such as Plautus and Cato, but it is also found in later writers such as Martial:
Some verbs have only the second imperative, for example scītō 'know', mementō 'remember'.

3rd person formal imperative

Related to the colloquial future imperative is the formal imperative of legal language, as in this invented law from Cicero's de Lēgibus:
According to J.G.F. Powell, appellāminō is not a genuine archaic form; in early Latin -minō is used only in deponent verbs and is 2nd or 3rd person singular.

Periphrastic tenses

A series of periphrastic tenses can be formed by combining a future participle or a gerundive with any tense of the verb sum 'I am', as follows:
ActiveMeaningPassiveMeaning
Presentductūrus sumI am going to leaddūcendus sumI need to be led
Futureductūrus erōI will be going to leaddūcendus erōI will need to be led
Imperfectductūrus eramI was going to leaddūcendus eramI needed to be led
Perfectductūrus fuīI was going to leaddūcendus fuīI needed to be led
Future perfectdūcendus fuerōI will have needed to be led
Pluperfectductūrus fueramI had been going to leaddūcendus eramI had needed to be led
---
Present subj.ductūrus simI am going to leaddūcendus simI need to be led
Imperfect subj.ductūrus essemI was going to leaddūcendus essemI needed to be led
Perfect subj.ductūrus fuerimI would have leddūcendus fuerimI needed to be led
Pluperfect subj.ductūrus fuissemI had been going to leaddūcendus fuissemI had needed to be led

The passive tenses formed with the gerundive are known as the 'periphrastic conjugation of the passive'.
Although the two series are similar in appearance, they are not parallel in meaning or function. Woodcock writes of the passive form: 'But for the introduction of the idea of necessity, it would form a periphrastic future passive tense parallel to the periphrastic future active.' For this reason, examples of the gerundival periphrastic tenses are gathered in a separate section below.

Periphrastic indicative

Periphrastic future

The present version of the future periphrastic describes a person's intention at the present time:

Future periphrastic future

Despite its name, the future periphrastic tense factūrus sum is really a present tense, describing a person's present intentions. For this reason, it can have a future form factūrus erō, used for example in future conditional or future temporal clauses:

Imperfect periphrastic future

A past version of the periphrastic future can be made with the imperfect tense of sum, describing what someone's intentions were at a moment in the past:
In a conditional sentence this tense can mean 'would have done':

Perfect periphrastic future

Although less common than the periphrastic future with eram, the perfect tense version of the periphrastic future is also found:
This tense can also be potential, expressing the meaning 'would have done':

Pluperfect periphrastic future

Periphrastic subjunctive

Periphrastic present subjunctive

In indirect statements and questions, the active periphrastic future can represent a future or periphrastic future tense of direct speech in primary sequence. In this case there is not necessarily any idea of planning or intention, although there may be:
This tense can also be used in primary sequence reported speech, to represent the main clause in either an ideal conditional sentence or a simple future one :

Periphrastic imperfect subjunctive

If the main verb is in past time, an imperfect version of the periphrastic future subjunctive is used:
It is also possible to form an imperfect periphrastic subjunctive with foret instead of esset :

Periphrastic perfect subjunctive

A perfect periphrastic subjunctive can be used with a conditional meaning in hypothetical conditional clauses in indirect questions in primary sequence. In this case it represents a pluperfect subjunctive in the original direct speech:
In an indirect question, the perfect periphrastic subjunctive can also sometimes reflect a potential imperfect subjunctive:
These tenses can be compared with the similar examples with the perfect periphrastic infinitive cited below, where a conditional sentence made in imperfect subjunctives is converted to an indirect statement.

Periphrastic pluperfect subjunctive

The pluperfect version of the periphrastic subjunctive can be used in a circumstantial cum clause:
It can also be used in conditional sentences after sī, as in the following sentence from an imaginary letter from Helen to Paris:
It can also reflect a potential pluperfect subjunctive in historic sequence in an indirect question:

Gerundive tenses

Present gerundive

The gerundive of the verb can be combined with the verb sum 'I am' to make a passive periphrastic tense. This usually expresses what is needing to be done:

Negative

The negative gerundive usually means 'not needing to be', as in the first example above. However, sometimes the interpretation 'ought not to be' or 'it isn't possible for it to be' is more appropriate:

Impersonal construction

Very often the passive periphrastic is used impersonally, together with a dative of the agent:
The impersonal form of this tense can also be made with intransitive verbs such as eō 'I go' and verbs such as persuādeō 'I persuade' and ūtor 'I use' which do not take an accusative object:

Future gerundive

An example of a future gerundive periphrastic is the following:

Imperfect gerundive

An example of the imperfect passive periphrastic is the following:

Perfect gerundive

As with the active perfect periphrastic, in a conditional sentence the perfect gerundive periphrastic tense can mean 'would have done':
Another meaning of the perfect passive is 'ought to have been done':
In the following result clause, this tense becomes subjunctive:

Future perfect gerundive

The active future perfect periphrastic tense is not found, but the passive occurs:

Sequence of tenses rule

Latin speakers used subjunctive verbs to report questions, statements, and ideas. When the verb of telling or asking in the dominant clause is primary, the subjunctive verb in the dependent clause must also be primary; when the verb in the dominant clause is historic, the subjunctive verb in the dependent clause must also be in a historic tense. This rule can be illustrated with the following table:
Main verbDependent verb
Primary tensesPresent
Future
Future Perfect
Present subjunctive
Perfect subjunctive
Historic tensesPerfect
Imperfect
Pluperfect
Historic infinitive
Imperfect subjunctive
Pluperfect subjunctive

This rule applies to all kinds of sentences where the dependent verb is put in the subjunctive mood, for example indirect speech, indirect questions, indirect commands, purpose clauses, consecutive clauses, clauses after verbs of fearing, quīn clauses and others. It does not apply to more loosely connected dependent clauses, such as relative clauses, where the verb is in the indicative, or to a dependent infinitive in indirect statement.
The perfect tense appears in both rows, depending on whether it has a present perfect meaning or past simple meaning. But even when it has a present perfect meaning it is often treated as a historic tense.

Examples of primary sequence

Some examples of primary sequence are the following:
Present indicative + present subjunctive:
Present subjunctive + present subjunctive:
Present imperative + periphrastic perfect subjunctive:
Present indicative + Perfect subjunctive:

Examples of historic sequence

Reported Question:
Imperfect subjunctive + pluperfect subjunctive:
Perfect indicative + imperfect subjunctive:
Historic infinitive + imperfect subjunctive:

Perfect tense main verb

When the main verb is a perfect tense, it is usually considered to be a historic tense, as in the above example. Occasionally, however, when the meaning is that of an English present perfect, the perfect in a main clause may be taken as a primary tense, for example:
However, the historic sequence after a perfect with present perfect meaning is also very common, for example:

Historic present main verb

When the main verb is a historic present, the dependent verb may be either primary or historic, but is usually primary:
Sometimes both primary and historic are found in the same sentence. In the following example the first dependent verb cūrat is primary sequence, but dīxisset is pluperfect:

Exceptions

There are frequent exceptions to the sequence of tenses rule, especially outside of indirect speech. For example, in the following sentence, a historic tense is followed by a perfect subjunctive:
In consecutive clauses also, a perfect tense in the main clause is often followed by a present or a perfect subjunctive:
Another exception is that an imperfect or pluperfect subjunctive in a clause that is already subordinate in the original sentence may often remain even in primary sequence:
Conversely, in such conditional sentences, the periphrastic perfect subjunctive may remain even after a historic-tense main verb:
The perfect tense potuerim also can replace a pluperfect tense with the meaning 'could have':
In general, in Livy, there is a tendency for a present or perfect tense of the original speech to be retained in historic sequence, as in the above example, while Cicero is more strict in following the historic sequence.
Caesar and Sallust can sometimes use a present subjunctive in historic sequence when the meaning is jussive :

Overview

The various tenses of the infinitive are as follows:
ActiveMeaningPassiveMeaning
Presentamāre
vidēre
dūcere
facere
audīre
esse
posse
velle
nōlle
mālle
īre
ferre
to love
to see
to lead
to do
to hear
to be
to be able
to want
to be unwilling
to prefer
to go
to bring
amārī
vidērī
dūcī
fierī
audīrī





īrī
ferrī
to be loved
to be seen
to be led
to be done
to be heard






to be brought
Perfectdūxisseto have ledductum esseto have been led
Futureductūrum esseto be going to leadductum īrīto be going to be led
Perfect
periphrastic
ductūrum fuisseto have been going to lead
Future perfect
periphrastic
ductum foreto be going to
have been led
Gerundive presentdūcendum esseto be needing to be led
Gerundive perfectdūcendum fuisseto have been
needing to be led
Gerundive futuredūcendum foreto be going to
need to be led

The present passive and deponent infinitive usually ends in -rī, but in 3rd conjugation verbs in only. The passive īrī is used impersonally:
In 1st conjugation verbs, the ending -āvisse is very often shortened to -āsse, e.g. amāsse 'to have loved'.
The infinitives of sum 'I am' are esse 'to be', fuisse 'to have been', and futūrum esse 'to be going to be'. Other irregular present infinitives are posse 'to be able', and ēsse/edere 'to eat'.
The irregular verbs possum 'I am able' and volō 'I want' have no future infinitive. In these verbs the present infinitive is used instead.
In early Latin, the passive and deponent infinitive often ends in -ier: vituperārier 'to be scolded', vidērier 'to be seen', nancīscier 'to obtain', expergīscier 'to wake up' etc.

Compound infinitives

The compound infinitives are usually found in the accusative case, as shown in the table above. Occasionally, however, they are found in the nominative, for example with dīcitur 'he is said' or vidētur 'he seems':
The participle can also change to show gender and plurality, as in the following where factās is feminine plural:
However, the passive future infinitive is made using the supine of the verb. The -um therefore stays constant and does not change for gender or number.
The future infinitive is used only for indirect statements.

Omission of

Very often the esse part of a compound infinitive is omitted:

Historic infinitive

The infinitive is occasionally used in narrative as a tense in its own right. It usually describes a scene in which the same action was being done repeatedly. There are often two or more historic infinitives in succession:

'Could have done', 'ought to have done'

The perfect tense potuī with the infinitive can often mean 'I was able to' or 'I managed to':
However, it can also mean 'I could have done ':
It can also be used in unreal past conditional sentences in the sense 'could have done':
'Ought to have done' is often expressed with a past tense of dēbeō 'I have a duty to' or oportet 'it is fitting' together with a present infinitive:
Sometimes, in familiar style, oportuit can be used with the perfect infinitive passive:

Indirect statement

The infinitive is very commonly used for the main verb in indirect statements. Except with passive sentences using dīcitur 'he is said' or vidētur 'he seems' and the like, the subject of the quoted sentence is put into the accusative case and the construction is known as an 'accusative and infinitive'.
The rule of tense is that the present infinitive is used for any action or situation which is contemporary with the main verb, the perfect for actions or situations anterior to the main verb, and the future infinitive for actions or situations later than the main verb. An exception to this rule is the verb meminī 'I remember', which when used of personal reminiscence is usually followed by a present infinitive.
The verbs iubeō 'I order' and volō 'I want' are always followed by the present infinitive, however. Occasionally also polliceor 'I promise' and meminī 'I threaten' can be followed by a present infinitive, if no accusative subject is added.

Present infinitive

The present infinitive is used to express an action or situation simultaneous with the verb of speaking:
The present infinitive is used after meminī when describing a personal reminiscence:
It also represents a present imperative in indirect commands made with the verbs iubeō 'I order' and vetō 'I forbid':

Perfect infinitive

In indirect statement, a perfect infinitive represents any event or situation prior to the time of the verb of speaking:
Often the verb of speaking is omitted:
The perfect infinitive may also at times be translated with a continuous tense in English:

Future infinitive

The future infinitive is used for events or situations in reported speech which are to take place later than the verb of speaking:
As with the perfect passive infinitive, esse is often omitted:
The future passive made using the supine of the verb with īrī is comparatively rare:
The verb possum 'I am able' has no future infinitive, but can have a future meaning:

Another way of expressing the future in indirect statement is to use the phrase fore ut 'it would be the case that'. This can be used with an active or passive verb, and almost always with either the present or the imperfect subjunctive:
Sometimes futūrum esse ut is used instead of fore ut:
Very rarely fore ut can be followed by a perfect or pluperfect subjunctive. In the following example, the pluperfect subjunctive represents a future perfect indicative of direct speech:

Future perfect infinitive

To express a future perfect tense in indirect statement is possible only if the verb is passive or deponent. In the following examples, a perfect participle is combined with the future infinitive fore:

Periphrastic perfect infinitive

The periphrastic perfect infinitive represents a potential pluperfect subjunctive in indirect statement:
If the introductory verb is passive, such as vidētur 'he seems', the participle is nominative:
The same tense of the infinitive can also represent the transformation into indirect statement of an imperfect potential subjunctive, referring to a hypothetical present situation:
In all the above examples, the imperfect subjunctive in the subordinate clause is left unchanged, despite the fact that the main verb is primary.
Just as fore ut is used to make a future passive infinitive, so futūrum fuisse ut can be used to make a potential passive infinitive:
However this is very rare, and in fact only two instances have been noted.

Gerundive infinitives

The gerundive infinitive in indirect speech indicates something which needs to be done at the time of the verb of speaking:
The perfect gerundive infinitive indicates something that was necessary at a previous time:
It can also refer to what ought to have been done at some time in the past:
In a conditional clause in reported speech the perfect gerundive infinitive can also refer to something that would have been necessary in some hypothetical situation:
The future gerundive infinitive is made with fore. It is used in indirect statements to describe something which it is going to be necessary to do:
It can also describe what must necessarily happen at a future time:

An overview of the tenses in indirect speech

A characteristic of Roman historical writing is that long speeches are reported indirectly. In this practice Roman writers such as Caesar, Sallust, Livy, Curtius, and Tacitus differ from Greek writers such as Thucydides, as well as from Roman poets such as Virgil and Ovid, who write their speeches in direct speech.
The rule for ōrātiō oblīqua is that the infinitive is used to represent the main verbs of statements, while all other verbs, that is, those in commands, most questions, and subordinate clauses, are put into the subjunctive mood. The writer may use primary sequence or historic, or sometimes a mixture of the two. The use of primary tenses in a historic context is known as repraesentātiō.
In some cases, the use of the subjunctive indicates that the sentence is partly in ōrātiō oblīqua. This is known as virtual ōrātiō oblīqua:
Subordinate clauses generally change their tenses less than the main clauses in reported speech. In some cases, when the main verb is 1st or 2nd person, the subordinate clause is not put in the subjunctive at all:
The following table shows the tenses used in main clauses in indirect questions and indirect statements :
Tense of original verbSubjunctive
Subjunctive
Infinitive
Present,
Imperative,
Jussive subjunctive
PresentImperfectPresent
Imperfect,
Perfect,
Pluperfect
PerfectPluperfectPerfect
Future,
Potential present
subjunctive
Periphrastic present,
Periphrastic imperf.,
Future,
Fore ut + pres/impf subj.
Future perfectNo examplesNo examplesPerfect participle + fore,
Fore ut + perf/pluperf subj.
Potential imperfect
subjunctive
Perfect periphrastic,
Imperfect
Perfect periphrastic,
Imperfect
Perfect periphrastic
Potential pluperfect
subjunctive
Perfect periphrastic,
Pluperfect,
Potuerit
Perfect periphrastic,
,
Pluperfect,
Potuerit
Perfect periphrastic,
Futūrum fuisse ut
+ pres/impf subj.

Participles

Compared to Greek, Latin is deficient in participles, having only three, as follows, as well as the gerundive. The Romans themselves considered the gerundive also to be a participle, but most modern grammars treat it as a separate part of speech.
The different participles of the verb dūcō are shown below:
ActivePassive
Presentdūcēns, pl. dūcentēsleading
Perfectductus, pl. ductīled, having been led
Futureductūrus, pl. ductūrīgoing to lead
Gerundivedūcendus, pl. dūcendīneeding to be led

The participles are all verbal adjectives, and so the ending changes according to case, gender, and number.
As the table shows, there is no passive present or future participle, and no active past participle. In deponent verbs, however, the Perfect participle is active in meaning, e.g. profectus, 'having set out', cōnātus 'having tried'. In deponent verbs, the gerundive is usually used in impersonal form and with an active meaning: proficīscendum est 'it is necessary to set out', moriendum est 'it is necessary to die', cōnandum est 'it is necessary to try'; but some deponent verbs have a personal gerundive with a passive sense: hortandus 'needing to be encouraged', sequendus 'needing to be followed':
Deponent verbs also have active present and future participles, e.g. moriēns 'dying', moritūrus 'about to die'.
The verb sum 'I am' has no Present or Perfect participle in classical Latin, but only the Future participle futūrus 'going to be'.
The verbs volō 'I want' and possum 'I am able' have no future participle. Potēns, the present participle of possum, has a limited use as an adjective meaning 'powerful'.
The 3rd and 4th conjugation gerundive in older texts such as Plautus ends with -undus: faciundum, ferundum, veniundum. Such endings are sometimes found even in classical Latin. Later, -endus became usual, but in the verb eō 'I go', the gerundive is always eundum 'necessary to go'.
Like the infinitive, the tenses of the participles are not absolute but relative to the main verb of the sentence. For example, a future participle can refer to an action in the past, provided it is later than the time of the main verb; and similarly the perfect participle can refer to an action in the future, provided it is earlier than the time of the main verb.

Present participle

The present participle usually describes a condition or an action which is happening at the time of the main verb:
Occasionally, a present participle can refer to an action which takes place immediately before the time of the main verb:

Perfect participle

The perfect participle refers to an action which took place before the time of the main verb, or to the state that something is in as a result of an earlier action:

Future participle

The future participle is most commonly used in the periphrastic tenses or in indirect statements. 'An examination of the usage of the various authors shows that the form in -ūrus did not reach the full status of a participle till the time of Livy. Up to the time of Caesar and Cicero its use was almost restricted to a combination with the verb esse, making a periphrastic future tense. Woodcock speculates that the -ūrus ending might originally have been a verbal noun. In later authors the future participle is sometimes used as in Greek to indicate purpose: