List of giant squid specimens and sightings


This []list of giant squid specimens and sightings is a comprehensive timeline of recorded human encounters with members of the genus Architeuthis, popularly known as giant squid. It includes animals that were caught by fishermen, found washed ashore, recovered from sperm whales and other predatory species, as well as those reliably sighted at sea. The list also covers specimens incorrectly assigned to the genus Architeuthis in original descriptions or later publications.

Background

History of discovery

Tales of giant squid have been common among mariners since ancient times, but the animals were long considered mythical and often associated with the kraken of Nordic legend. The giant squid did not gain widespread scientific acceptance until specimens became available to zoologists in the second half of the 19th century, beginning with the formal naming of Architeuthis dux by Japetus Steenstrup in 1857, from fragmentary Bahamian material collected two years earlier. The giant squid came to public prominence in 1861 when the French corvette Alecton encountered a live animal at the surface while navigating near Tenerife. A report of the incident filed by the ship's captain was almost certainly seen by Jules Verne and adapted by him for the description of the monstrous squid in Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea.
The giant squid's existence was established beyond doubt only in the 1870s, with the appearance of an extraordinary number of complete specimens—both dead and alive—in Newfoundland waters. These were meticulously documented in a series of papers by Yale zoologist Addison Emery Verrill. Among the earliest known photographs of the giant squid were of two of these Newfoundland specimens, both from 1873: first a single severed tentacle—hacked off a live animal as it "attacked" a fishing boat —and weeks later an intact animal in two parts ; the head and limbs of this latter specimen were famously shown draped over the sponge bath of Moses Harvey, a local clergyman, essayist, and amateur naturalist. Harvey secured and reported widely on both of these important specimens—as well as numerous others —and it was largely through his efforts that giant squid became known to North American and British zoologists. Recognition of Architeuthis as a real animal led to the reappraisal of earlier reports of gigantic tentacled sea creatures, with some of these subsequently being accepted as records of giant squid, the earliest stretching back to at least the 17th century.
For a time in the late 19th century almost every major specimen of which material was saved was described as a new species. In all, [|some twenty species names] were coined. However, there is no widely agreed basis for distinguishing between the named species, and both morphological and genetic data point to the existence of a single, globally distributed species, which according to the principle of priority must be known by the earliest available name: Architeuthis dux.
It is not known why giant squid become stranded on shore, but it may be because the distribution of deep, cold water where they live is temporarily altered. Marine biologist and Architeuthis specialist Frederick Aldrich proposed that there may be a periodicity to the strandings around Newfoundland, and based on historical data suggested an average interval between mass strandings of some 30 years. Aldrich used this value to correctly predict a relatively small stranding event between 1964 and 1966. Although strandings continue to occur sporadically throughout the world, few have been as frequent as those in Newfoundland in the late 19th century. A notable exception was a 15-month period between 2014 and 2015, during which an unprecedented 57 specimens were recorded from Japanese coastal waters of the Sea of Japan.
Though the total number of recorded giant squid specimens now runs [|into the hundreds], the species remains notoriously elusive and little known. Attempts to capture a glimpse of a live giant squid—described as "the most elusive image in natural history" —were mooted since at least the 1960s. Efforts intensified significantly towards the end of the century, with the launch of several multi-million-dollar expeditions in the late 1990s, though these were all unsuccessful. The first years of the 21st century saw a number of breakthroughs in live giant squid imaging that ultimately culminated in the first recordings of live animals in their natural deep-water habitat—from both a remote camera system and a manned submersible—in July 2012. Despite these recent advances and the growing number of both specimens and recordings of live animals, the species continues to occupy a unique place in the public imagination. As Roper et al. wrote: "Few events in the natural world stimulate more excitement and curiosity among scientists and laymen alike than the discovery of a specimen of Architeuthis."

Distribution patterns

The genus Architeuthis has a cosmopolitan or bi-subtropical distribution. The greatest numbers of specimens have been recorded in the North Atlantic around Newfoundland and the Iberian Peninsula, in the South Atlantic off South Africa and Namibia, in the northwestern Pacific off Japan, and in the southwestern Pacific around New Zealand and Australia. The vast majority of specimens are of oceanic origin, including marginal seas broadly open to adjacent ocean, especially the Tasman Sea and Sea of Japan, but also the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea, among others. A handful are known from the far western Mediterranean Sea, but these records do not necessarily indicate that the Mediterranean falls within the natural range of the giant squid, as the specimens may have been transported there by inflowing Atlantic water. Similarly, giant squid are unlikely to naturally occur in the North Sea owing to its shallow depth. They are generally absent from equatorial and high polar latitudes.

Total number of specimens

According to Guerra et al., 592 confirmed giant squid specimens were known as of the end of 2004. Of these, 306 came from the Atlantic Ocean, 264 from the Pacific Ocean, 20 from the Indian Ocean, and 2 from the Mediterranean Sea. The figures for specimens collected in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans further broke down as follows: 148 in the northeastern Atlantic, 126 in the northwestern Atlantic, [|26] in the southeastern Atlantic, 6 in the southwestern Atlantic, 43 in the northeastern Pacific, 28 in the northwestern Pacific, 10 in the southeastern Pacific, and 183 in the southwestern Pacific.
Guerra & González reported that the total number of recorded giant squid specimens stood at 624. Guerra et al. gave an updated figure of 677 specimens. Paxton put the total at around 700 as of 2015, of which 460 had been measured in some way. This number has increased substantially in recent years, with 57 specimens recorded from the Sea of Japan over an extraordinary 15-month period in 2014–2015. The giant squid nevertheless remains a rarely encountered animal, especially considering its large size, with Ellis writing that "each giant squid that washes up or is taken from the stomach of a sperm whale is still an occasion for a teuthological celebration".
.
RegionNumber of specimens% of totalFound stranded or floating From fishing From predators Method of capture unknown
NE Atlantic15222.54931155
NW Atlantic14821.9613018
SE Atlantic60*8.910601713
SW Atlantic60.95016133
NE Pacific436.4756307
NW Pacific30*4.43035305
SE Pacific101.5901000
SW Pacific18327.01241425
Indian Ocean33**4.869400
W Mediterranean30.4100000
Equatorial/tropical91.31144450
All regions677100.0

Procurement and display

Preserved giant squid specimens are much sought after for display. Guerra et al. estimated that around 30 were exhibited at museums and aquaria worldwide, while Guerra & Segonzac provided an updated list of 35. The purpose-built Centro del Calamar Gigante in Luarca, Spain, had by far the largest collection on public display, but many of the museum's 14 or so total specimens were destroyed during a storm on 2 February 2014. At least 13 specimens were exhibited in Japan as of February 2017, of which 10 had been acquired since 2013.
in Washington, D.C., as it appeared in 2008. Caught in Spanish waters in July 2005, it is one of two giant squid on display at the museum and one of the few publicly exhibited male specimens.
InstitutionLocationCountryTypeSpecimen
American Museum of Natural HistoryNew York City, New YorkUnited Statesnational museum1 female
Auckland University of TechnologyAuckland, North IslandNew Zealandprivate1 female
Aula del Mar Málaga / Museo AlboraniaMálaga, AndalusiaSpainprivate1 female
Centro de Gestión del Medio Marino del Estrecho Algeciras, AndalusiaSpainprivate1 female
Centro del Calamar GiganteLuarca, AsturiasSpainnational museum4 females; 1 male
Deep Sea WorldNorth Queensferry, ScotlandUnited Kingdomprivate1 female
Florida Museum of Natural HistoryGainesville, FloridaUnited Statesnational museum1 female
Georgia AquariumAtlanta, GeorgiaUnited Statesprivate1 female
Iziko South African MuseumCape Town, Western CapeSouth Africanational museum1 female
Kaikoura Marine Centre and AquariumKaikoura, South IslandNew Zealandprivate1 female
Kelly Tarlton's Sea Life AquariumAuckland, North IslandNew Zealandprivate1 female
Melbourne MuseumMelbourne, VictoriaAustralianational museum1 female
Mote AquariumSarasota, FloridaUnited Statesprivate1 female
Museo de Historia Natural Ferrol, GaliciaSpainnational museum1 female
Museo Nacional de Ciencias NaturalesMadrid, Community of MadridSpainnational museum1 female
Muséum national d'histoire naturelleParis, Île-de-FranceFrancenational museum1 female
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa TongarewaWellington, North IslandNew Zealandnational museum1 female
Museu Oceanográfico do Portinho da ArrábidaSetúbal, Lisboa RegionPortugalnational museum1 male
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchAuckland, North IslandNew Zealandprivate1 female
National Marine AquariumPlymouth, EnglandUnited Kingdomprivate1 female
National Museum of Natural HistoryWashington, D.C.United Statesnational museum1 female ; 1 male
National Museum of Nature and ScienceTaito City, TokyoJapannational museum1 female
National Museum of ScotlandEdinburgh, ScotlandUnited Kingdomnational museum1 female
Natural History MuseumLondon, EnglandUnited Kingdomnational museum1 female
Naturalis Biodiversity CenterLeiden, South HollandNetherlandsprivate1 male
Okinawa Churaumi AquariumMotobu, Okinawa PrefectureJapanprivate1 female
Queensland Museum Melbourne, VictoriaAustraliaprivate1 female
Tasmanian Museum and Art GalleryHobart, TasmaniaAustralianational museum2 females
The Rooms St. John's, Newfoundland and LabradorCanadaprivate1 female

Reported sizes

Giant squid size—long a subject of both popular debate and academic inquiry —has often been misreported and exaggerated. Reports of specimens reaching or even exceeding in total length are widespread, but no animals approaching this size have been scientifically documented in recent times, despite the hundreds of specimens available for study. The "Thimble Tickle specimen" reported by Verrill is often cited as the largest giant squid ever recorded, and the specimen described by Kirk as Architeuthis longimanus —a strangely proportioned animal that has been much commented on—is sometimes cited as the longest. It is now thought likely that such lengths were achieved by great lengthening of the two long feeding tentacles, analogous to stretching elastic bands, or resulted from inadequate measurement methods such as pacing.
Based on a 40-year data set of more than 50 giant squid specimens, Roper & Shea suggest an average total length at maturity of and a "rarely encountered maximum length" of. Of the nearly 100 specimens examined by Clyde Roper, the largest was "46 feet long". Yukhov gives a maximum total length of based on records from the southern hemisphere; Remeslo gives. O'Shea & Bolstad give a maximum total length of for females based on the examination of more than 130 specimens, measured post mortem and relaxed, as well as beaks recovered from sperm whales. Steve O'Shea estimated the maximum total length for males at . Charles G. M. Paxton performed a statistical analysis using literature records of giant squid specimens and concluded that "squid with a conservative TL of would seem likely based on current data", but the study has been heavily criticised by experts in the field.
of total length, mantle length, and mass in Architeuthis dux, from McClain et al.. The extreme outlier is sourced from Verrill and is unlikely to be accurate; the next most massive individual in the data set was only, and 95% of specimens were below .
O'Shea & Bolstad give a maximum mantle length of based on the examination of more than 130 specimens, as well as beaks recovered from sperm whales, though there are recent scientific records of specimens that slightly exceed this size. Remeslo and Yukhov give a maximum mantle length of for females from southern waters. Questionable records of up to ML can be found in older literature. Paxton accepts a maximum recorded ML of, based on the Lyall Bay specimen reported by Kirk, but this record has been called into question as the gladius of this specimen was said to be only long.
Including the head and arms but excluding the tentacles, the species very rarely exceeds according to O'Shea & Bolstad. Paxton considers to be the greatest reliably measured SL, based on a specimen reported by Verrill, and considers specimens of SL or more to be "very probable", but these conclusions have been criticised by giant squid experts.
O'Shea put the maximum weight of female giant squid at, based on the examination of some 105 specimens as well as beaks recovered from sperm whales. Giant squid are sexually size dimorphic, with the maximum weight for males estimated at , though heavier specimens have occasionally been reported. Similarly, Remeslo and Yukhov give maximum masses of and for females and males, respectively, based on records from southern latitudes. Roper & Jereb give a maximum weight of up to, and "possibly greater". Discredited weights of as much as a tonne or more are not uncommon in older literature.

Species identifications

The taxonomy of the giant squid genus Architeuthis has not been entirely resolved. Lumpers and splitters may propose as many as eight species or as few as one, with most authors recognising either one cosmopolitan species or three geographically disparate species: A. dux from the Atlantic, A. martensi from the North Pacific, and A. sanctipauli from the Southern Ocean. Historically, some twenty species names and eight genus names have been applied to architeuthids. No genetic or physical basis for distinguishing between the named species has been proposed, though specimens from the North Pacific do not appear to reach the maximum dimensions seen in giant squid from other areas. There may also be regional differences in the relative proportions of the tentacles and their sucker counts. The mitogenomic analysis of Winkelmann et al. supports the existence of a single, globally distributed species. The same conclusion was reached by Förch on the basis of morphological data.
The literature on giant squid has been further muddied by the frequent misattribution of various squid specimens to the genus Architeuthis, often based solely on their large size. In the academic literature alone, such misidentifications encompass at least the oegopsid families Chiroteuthidae, Cranchiidae #Mhamiltoni1|# and List of giant squid specimens and sightings, Ommastrephidae, Onychoteuthidae #Orobusta1|# and List of giant squid specimens and sightings, and Psychroteuthidae . Many more misidentifications have been propagated in the popular press, involving—among others—Megalocranchia cf. fisheri, Thysanoteuthis rhombus, and an egg mass of Nototodarus gouldi. This situation is further confused by the occasional usage of the common name 'giant squid' in reference to large squids of other genera.

List of giant squid

Sourcing and progenitors

The present list generally follows "Records of Architeuthis Specimens from Published Reports", compiled by zoologist Michael J. Sweeney of the Smithsonian Institution and including records through 1999, with additional information taken from other sources. While Sweeney's list is sourced almost entirely from the scientific literature, many of the more recent specimens are supported by reports from the news media, including newspapers and magazines, radio and television broadcasts, and online sources.
Earlier efforts to compile a list of all known giant squid encounters throughout history include those of marine writer and artist Richard Ellis. Ellis's second list, published as an appendix to his 1998 book The Search for the Giant Squid, comprises 166 entries spanning four and a half centuries, from 1545 to 1996. Records which appear in Ellis's 1998 list but are not found in Sweeney & Roper's 2001 list have a citation to Ellis —in the page range 257–265—in the 'Additional references' column of the main table.
In addition to these global specimen lists, a number of regional compilations have been published, including Aldrich for Newfoundland, Okiyama for the Sea of Japan, Förch for New Zealand, Guerra et al. for Asturias, Spain, and Roper et al. for the western North Atlantic. Works exhaustively enumerating all recorded specimens from a particular mass appearance event include those of Verrill for Newfoundland in 1870–1881 and Kubodera et al. for the Sea of Japan in 2014–2015. Though the number of authenticated giant squid records now runs into the hundreds, individual specimens still generate considerable scientific interest and continue to have scholarly papers unto themselves.

Scope and inclusion criteria

The list includes records of giant squid either supported by a physical specimen or—in the absence of any saved material—where at least one of the following conditions is satisfied: the specimen was examined by an expert prior to disposal and thereby positively identified as a giant squid; a photograph or video recording of the specimen was taken, on the basis of which it was assigned to the genus Architeuthis by a recognised authority; or the record was accepted as being that of a giant squid by a contemporary expert or later authority.
by W. A. Cranston of a giant squid attacking a boat. Only sightings deemed authentic by published experts are included in the list.
Purported sightings of giant squid lacking both physical and documentary evidence and expert appraisal are generally excluded, with the exception of those appearing in the lists of Ellis, Ellis, or Sweeney & Roper . In particular, "sea monster" sightings—many of which have been attributed to giant squid by various authors—fall short of this standard.
The earliest records of very large squid date to classical antiquity and the writings of Aristotle and Pliny the Elder. But in the absence of detailed descriptions or surviving remains, it is not possible to assign these to the giant squid genus Architeuthis with any confidence, and they are therefore not included in this list. Basque and Portuguese cod fishermen observed what were likely giant squid carcasses in the waters of the Grand Banks of Newfoundland as early as the 16th century, but conclusive evidence is similarly lacking. The earliest specimens identifiable as true giant squid are generally accepted to be ones from the early modern period in the 17th and 18th centuries, and possibly as far back as the 16th century.
All developmental stages from hatchling to mature adult are included. In the literature there is a single anecdotal account of a giant squid "egg case", but this is excluded due to a lack of substantiating evidence. Indirect evidence of giant squid—such as sucker scars found on sperm whales—falls outside the scope of this list.
Specimens misassigned to the genus Architeuthis in print publications or news reports are also included, but are [|clearly highlighted as misidentifications].

List of specimens

Records are listed chronologically in ascending order and numbered accordingly. This numbering is not meant to be definitive but rather to provide a convenient means of referring to individual records. Specimens incorrectly assigned to the genus Architeuthis are counted separately, their numbers enclosed in square brackets, and are highlighted in pink. Records that cover multiple giant squid specimens, or remains of more than a single animal, have the 'Material cited' cell highlighted in grey. Animals that were photographed or filmed while alive are highlighted in yellow. Where a record falls into more than one of these categories, a combination of shadings is used. Where an image of a specimen is available this is indicated by a camera symbol that links to the image.
, showing the exceptionally long feeding tentacles, which are often missing or damaged in recovered specimens. Some of the more extreme published giant squid measurements have been attributed to artificial lengthening of these tentacles. Almost the entire bulk of the animal—that is, the mantle, head, and arms—takes up less than half of its total length; the absence of the tentacles, therefore, has a great effect on the animal's total length but very little on its mass.
#DateLocationNature of encounterIdentificationMaterial citedMaterial savedSexSize and measurementsRepositoryMain referencesAdditional referencesNotes

1546Øresund, near Malmö, Denmark–Norway [since 1658 Malmö has been part of Sweden]
Found washed ashore; "caught live" "Japetus Steenstrup delivered a lecture in 1854 with a strong suggestion that the 'soemunk' was an Architeuthis." ; Architeuthis monachus Steenstrup in Harting, 1860; Squatina squatina Entire?Undetermined?WL: ~3 mBelon ; Belon ; Gessner ; Steenstrup ; Lönnberg ; Roeleveld & Knudsen ; Ellis ; Paxton & Holland Nordgård ; Muus ; Russell & Russell ; Aldrich Drawings of animal sent by Christian III of Denmark to Holy Roman Emperor Charles V sometime between 1545 and 1550. Mentioned in the writings of 16th century naturalists Pierre Belon, Guillaume Rondelet, and Conrad Gesner, though giant squid identity first proposed by Japetus Steenstrup in lecture on 26 November 1854. Muus wrote: "From contemporary descriptions with accompanying woodcuts it appears that the animal was regarded as a 'soemunk'." Paxton & Holland concluded that the specimen "was unlikely to have been a giant squid The most likely alternative suspect would be the angelshark Squatina squatina". The similar sea bishop has also been interpreted as a giant squid carcass, or a Jenny Haniver made from a skate.
2Autumn 1639"Thingøre Sand, Nordresyssel" or "Thingøresand, Hunevandsyssel", Iceland
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis sp.EntireOne armBL+HL: ~; AL: ~; TL: ~; BC: ~Thingøre monastery; "museum at Copenhagen" Jónsson ; Ólafsson ; #Steenstrup1849|Steenstrup ; #Steenstrup1898|Steenstrup ; Ellis Packard ; Verrill ; Robson ; Muus

~15 October 1673Dingle-I-cosh, Kerry, Ireland
Found floating at surface, in process of washing ashore, aliveDinoteuthis proboscideus More, 1875; Architeuthis monachus ; Ommastrephes monachus EntireTwo arms, buccal mass, and suckers taken to DublinTL: ~ + ; AL: ~; "liver": Undetermined ; holotype of Dinoteuthis proboscideus More, 1875#Anonc1673| ; #Hookeetalc1674|Hooke et al. ; More ; Verrill ; Tryon ; Ellis ; Sueur-Hermel More ; Massy ; Ritchie ; Robson ; Rees ; Hardy ; Collins Found by James Steward. Original material relating to this specimen consists of: a broadsheet printed in London with three letters together with a description and illustration ; a fourth letter in manuscript ; a broadsheet printed in Dublin to be distributed as a handbill ; and an eight-page booklet printed in London with a woodcut reproduction of the illustration in the broadsheet.
41680Ulvangen Fjord, Alstadhoug parish, Norway
Not statedEntire?Pontoppidan #Steenstrup1857|Steenstrup ; Grieg
51770Jutland, Denmark
UnknownMuss Ellis
627 May 1785Grand Banks, Newfoundland
Found floating deadArchiteuthis sp.BL: Thomas ; Aldrich Data from Capt. G. Cartwright.
7November or December 1790Arnarnaesvik, Modruvalle, Iceland
Found washed ashoreEntireNone; used for cod bait"longest tentacula": >; "body right from the head": ; "so thick that a fullgrown man could hardly embrace it with his arms"#Steenstrup1849|Steenstrup ; #Steenstrup1898|Steenstrup ; Ellis February 1792 diary of Sveinn Pálsson ; Verrill ; Robson Called Kolkrabbe by local people.
817-- Freshwater Bay, near mouth of St. John's harbour, Newfoundland
UnknownArchiteuthis sp.Thomas ; Aldrich
917--Grand Banks, Newfoundland
UnknownArchiteuthis sp.Aldrich
101798north coast of Denmark
Not stated"gigantic squid"Unknown"museum at Copenhagen" Packard Ellis
119 January 1802off Tasmania, Australia
Found at surface, alive?Loligo "]"size of a barrel" ; AL: 1.9–2.2 m; AD: 18–21 cmPéron Quoy & Gaimard ; Ellis Péron wrote: "it rolled with noise in the midst of the waves, and its long arms, stretched out on their surface, stirred like so many enormous reptiles".
121817–1820Atlantic Ocean, near equator
Found floating at surface"énorme calmar"Partial remains; "tentacles" missingWT: 100 "livres" ; WT: 200 "livres" Quoy & Gaimard Packard ; Ellis Found at surface in calm weather. Quoy & Gaimard opined: "it is easy to imagine that one of these terrible molluscs could readily remove a man from a fairly large boat, but not a medium-tonnage vessel, still less tilting this vessel and endangering it, as some would like to believe".

December 1853Raabjerg beach, North Jutland, coast of Skagerack, Denmark
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis monachusEntireJaws only; radula discarded after poor preservation; jaws cut out; portion used for bait; remainder buried after 2 daysWT: 80–85 kg; jaw measurements #Steenstrup1898|Steenstrup ZMUC; holotype of Architeuthis monachus Steenstrup, 1857 #Steenstrup1855b|Steenstrup ; Harting ; #Steenstrup1898|Steenstrup ; Kristensen & Knudsen #Steenstrup1857|Steenstrup ; Packard ; Gervais ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Posselt ; Nordgård "Architeuthis monachus" Steenstrup = nomen nudum .

5 November 1855western Atlantic Ocean, near Bahamas
Not stated; presumably found floating at surfaceArchiteuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857; Architeuthis titan Arm, suckers, and gladiusArm, suckers, and gladiusMaleWL: 377 cm; AL: 1/2 whole length ; beak measurements; GL: ZMUC; holotype of Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857 ; ZMB Moll. 34798 #Steenstrup1857|Steenstrup ; #Steenstrup1882|Steenstrup ; #Steenstrup1898|Steenstrup ; Tryon ; Kristensen & Knudsen ; Glaubrecht & Salcedo-Vargas Packard ; Verrill ; Posselt ; Toll & Hess Obtained by Capt. V. Hygom. Japetus Steenstrup donated single sucker to Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, which was incorporated into collection in 1883 according to catalogue entry.
15December 1855Aalbaekbugten, Denmark
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis sp.Entire?Undetermined-Muus Posselt

Unknown Unknown
Not statedArchiteuthis dux ; ?Ommastrephes hartingii ; Architeuthis hartingii ; nomen nudum Jaws, buccal mass, detached arm suckersJaws, buccal mass, detached arm suckersASD: Utrecht University Natural History Museum; holotype of Loligo hartingii Verrill, 1875. Harting specimen No. 1Harting ; Kent ; Verrill ; Tryon ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Pfeffer Dell
171860between Hillswick and Scalloway, Shetland, Scotland
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis monachus Steenstrup, 1857; Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857 UndeterminedTL: ; AL: ~; BL: ~Jeffreys ; Stephen More ; Pfeffer ; Rees ; Collins

30 November ?1861 about northeast of Teneriffe, Canary Islands
Found floating at surfaceLoligo bouyeri ; ?Ommastrephes bouyeri Entire, decomposed-BL: -Bouyer ; Crosse & Fischer ; Bouyer ; Kent ; Verrill ; Tryon ; Heuvelmans Frédol ; Figuier ; Frédol ; Mangin ; Meunier ; Kent ; Gervais ; Lee ; Rees & Maul ; Muntz ; Lagrange Observed only by officers of the French gunboat Alecton; sketch made. A report of the incident filed by the ship's lieutenant was almost certainly seen by Jules Verne and adapted by him for the description of the monstrous squid in Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea. Iconography discussed by Lagrange.
191862North Atlantic
UnknownCrosse & Fischer Ellis

Unknown; 1870?Cape Sable, Nova Scotia, Canada
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis megaptera Verrill, 1878 EntireEntireBL: ; BL+HL: ; EL: ; TL: ; AL: ; FW: ; FL: ; extensive additional measurementsNSMC; catalog no. 1870-Z-2. YPM; catalog nos. , ; holotype of Architeuthis megaptera Verrill, 1878 ; Verrill specimen No. 21 Verrill ; Tryon ; Verrill ; Verrill Non-architeuthid. Collected by J.M. Jones.
20September 1870Waimarama, east coast of Wellington, New Zealand
Found washed ashoreEntireBeakBL+HL: ; BC: ; AL: In Kirk's possession; Kirk specimen No. 1Kirk ; Verrill Meinertzhagen letter 27 June 1879 to Kirk; Pfeffer ; Dell Mr. Meinertzhagen sent beak, saved by third party, to Kirk. Natives called specimen a "taniwha".
1870 Lamaline, Newfoundland
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis monachus of SteenstrupTwo specimens; entire?Two; EL: and EL: Unknown; Verrill specimen Nos. 8 & 9 Murray ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Harvey ; Kent ; Frost Data from Mr. Harvey letter citing Rev. M. Gabriel's statement to Harvey.

October 1871Grand Banks, Newfoundland
Found floating at surfaceArchiteuthis princeps Verrill, 1875Entire; part used as baitJaws obtained from Baird for examination by VerrillBL: ~; BD: ; AL: ~ ; AD: ; AC: ; beak; BC: ; WT: Jaws at NMNH ; lower jaw is syntype of Architeuthis princeps Verrill, 1875b; Verrill specimen No. 1 Packard ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Pfeffer ; Frost Taken by Capt. Campbell, Schooner B.D. Haskins.
231871Wellington, New Zealand
?EL: Dell Ellis
241872 Coomb's Cove, Newfoundland
Found alive in shallow water, having been driven ashore in heavy seaEntire; "one long arm missing" BL: ; BD: ; TL: ; AL: ~; AD: ; skin + flesh: thick; EL: Unknown; Verrill specimen No. 3 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Owen ; Frost Specimen had a reddish colour. Verrill's data taken from newspaper accounts and 15/VI/1873 T.R. Bennett letter to Prof. Baird. Verrill states his No. 6 is same specimen as No. 3; this cannot be correct, since capture date for No. 6 is clearly stated as December 1874 by Verrill .

December 1872Bonavista Bay, Newfoundland
Found washed ashore?Architeuthis dux ; ?Architeuthis harveyi Entire Pair of jaws and two suckersTL: ; AL: ~; BL: ~ ; BC: NMNH. YPM; catalog no. . Verrill specimen No. 4 ; and possibly also Verrill specimen No. 11 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Pfeffer ; Frost Material from Rev. A. Munn, through Prof. Baird to Verrill.

Unknown North Atlantic Ocean
From sperm whale stomachArchiteuthis princeps Verrill, 1875; Ommastrephes princeps Upper and lower jawsUpper and lower jawsBeak measurementsPresented by Capt. N.E. Atwood of Provincetown, Massachusetts to EI ; PASS ; syntype of Architeuthis princeps Verrill, 1875b; Verrill specimen No. 10 Packard ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Tryon ; Verrill ; Verrill Frost Verrill states Packard's illustration is inaccurate.
1873Yedo fishmarket, Japan
PurchasedMegateuthis martensii Hilgendorf, 1880; Nomen spurium 'Entire', missing head, "abdominal sac", ends of tentacles and arms Not specifiedML: 186 cm; WL: 414 cm; HL: 41 cm; AL: 197 cm ; ASD: 1.5 cm ; EyD: 200 mmZMB Moll. 34716 + 38980; holotype of Megateuthis martensii Hilgendorf, 1880 Hilgendorf ; Pfeffer ; Sasaki ; Glaubrecht & Salcedo-Vargas Owen ; Sasaki Second specimen from Tokyo fishmarket seen by Franz Martin Hilgendorf and used for description of gladius. Of other specimen, Hilgendorf saved assorted parts: "Theile eines Armes, die Hüllen des Auges, und ein Bruchstück des Schulpes". Model of specimen placed in Exhibition of Fishery in Berlin.

26 October 1873off Portugal Cove, Conception Bay, Newfoundland
Found floating at surface, aliveMegaloteuthis harveyi Kent, 1874; Architeuthis monachus of Steenstrup ; ?Architeuthis harveyi EntireOne tentacle; one arm discarded TL: ; TSD: ; TC: ; additional measurements based on photograph ; additional club measurement from Harvey letter ; BL: ~; EL: ~ YPM?; holotype of Megaloteuthis harveyi Kent, 1874; Verrill specimen No. 2 Harvey ; Harvey ; Harvey ; Harvey ; Murray ; Murray ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Kent ; Kent ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Haslam "13 December Field"; #Anon1873| ; Harvey ; #Anon1874| ; Rathbun ; Owen ; Lee ; #Anon1902b| ; Pfeffer ; Frost ; Aldrich ; Dery Found floating at surface; struck by Theophilus Picot from boat; attacked boat. Considered by Paxton as the "longest visually estimated" total length of any giant squid specimen. Dery wrote: "contemporary teuthologists dismiss the "attack" as the death throes of a moribund animal, pointing out that virtually all giant squid encountered on the ocean’s surface are dead or dying. "There is not a single corroborated story of a squid attacking a man, a boat, or a submersible", asserts Ellis."

25 November? 1873Logy Bay, Newfoundland
In herring net?Architeuthis monachus of Steenstrup ; Ommastrephes monachus ; Architeuthis harveyi Entire Miscellaneous parts obtained from Rev. M. Harvey BL: ~; BC: ; caudal fin: broad; TL: ; TC: ; AL: ; AC:,,, ; ASC: ~100; CSC: ~160; club description; extensive description of reconstructed partsYPM; catalog nos. , , , , . Verrill specimen No. 5 Harvey ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Kent ; Kent ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Tryon ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Pfeffer ; Aldrich ; Haslam Harvey in Morning Chronicle of St. John's; Maritime Monthly Magazine of St. John's, March 1874; several other newspapers; #Anon1874| ; Lee ; #Anon1902b| ; Frost entire body, somewhat mutilated anteriorly; b) head and 10 limbs. Poorly preserved; first in brine, then in alcohol. Capture date given as December several times, then as November several times and as 25 November by Aldrich. Verrill's description served as the basis for a number of life-sized models, including the one that now hangs at the Peabody Museum of Natural History, built in 1966, though it was also based on several Newfoundland specimens from the 1960s. Matthew Gavin Frank wrote a work of creative nonfiction on this specimen and the famous photograph of it draped over Harvey's shower curtain rod.

Unknown Unknown; South-American coast
?
Not statedArchiteuthis monachus ; Plectoteuthis grandis Owen, 1881; Architeuthis sp.? ; nomen nudum Sessile armArmAL: ; AC: BMNH; holotype of Plectoteuthis grandis Owen, 1881Kent ; Kent ; Verrill ; Owen ; Verrill ; Verrill ; #Steenstrup1882|Steenstrup ; Pfeffer Dell
311874Buøy, Foldenfjord, Norway
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis duxEntire-WL: ~4 mGrieg Nordgård
10 May 1874off Trincomalee, Sri Lanka
Reportedly seen sinking shipUnknownThe Times, 4 July 1874; Mystic Press, 31 July 1874; Lane ; Ellis ; Boyle ; Uragoda Ellis Schooner Pearl with crew of six, including captain James Floyd, supposedly sunk by giant squid. Incident reportedly seen from passenger steamer Strathowen, bound from Colombo to Madras, which rescued five of the crew. Veracity of account has been questioned.

2 November 1874on beach, St. Paul Island, Indian Ocean
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis mouchezi Vélain ; Mouchezis sancti-pauli Vélain ; Ommastrephes mouchezi Entire; found in advanced state of decayTentacle and buccal massEL: 7.15 mMNHN; catalog nos. 3-2-658 + 3-2-659 ; holotype of Mouchezis sancti-pauli Vélain, 1877Vélain ; Vélain ; Vélain ; Tryon ; Owen ; Pfeffer Gervais ; Verrill ; Wright Recorded by geologist Charles Vélain during French astronomical mission to Île Saint-Paul to observe the transit of Venus. Specimen was photographed.

December 1874Grand Bank, Fortune Bay, Newfoundland
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis princepsEntire, except for tail Jaws, one tentacular suckerEL: ; HL+BL: ; ?TL: ; TL: ; TC: ; BL: ; jawsYPM; catalog nos. , . Verrill specimen No. 6 and Verrill specimen No. 13 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Simms letter 27/X/1875 to Verrill; Frost Data from 10/XII/1873 letter from Mr. Harvey to unknown individual citing measurements taken by G. Simms; Pfeffer. Measurements are given differently in different papers. Verrill and Verrill states his No. 6 is same specimen as No. 3; this cannot be correct, as capture date for No. 6 is clearly stated as December 1874 by Verrill . Verrill repeats record as his No. 13.
35winter of 1874–1875near Harbor Grace, Newfoundland
Found washed ashoreDestroyedNone takenNone; Verrill specimen No. 12 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Frost "destroyed before its value became known, and no measurements are given"
36Unknown west St. Modent, Strait of Belle Isle, Newfoundland
Found aliveArchiteuthis princeps or Architeuthis monachus of SteenstrupEntireNone; cut up, salted, and barrelled for dog meat?TL: ; BL+HL: ; EL: ; SD: ~None; Verrill specimen No. 7 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Dr. Honeyman article in Halifax newspaper; Frost Data from unidentified third party cited in Halifax newspaper article.

25 April 1875 north-west of Boffin Island, Connemara, Ireland
Found immobile at surface; attacked and chased by fishermen; arms successively hacked off and eventually killedArchiteuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857EntireBeak and buccal mass, one arm, portions of both tentacles ; head, eyes and second arm initially saved, but soon lost/destroyedTL: ; TL: 14/17 ft ; CL: ; CSD: nearly ; SSD: ; AL: ; AC: ; beak: ~ × ; "trunk": "fully as long as the canoe"; EyD: ~; WT: ~ ; additional sucker measurementsNMIO'Connor ; More ; More ; Verrill ; Massy Galway Express 1875; Ritchie ; Massy ; Robson ; Rees ; Hardy ; Collins On public display. Caught by three-man longline fishing crew of currach for use as bait for coarse fish. Found motionless at surface surrounded by gulls, becoming active upon being attacked by fishermen, swimming away "at a tremendous rate" and releasing ink. Progressively disabled with a knife as chased for 2 hours over, before head eventually severed; heavy mantle allowed to sink. Specimen secured and preserved by Sergeant Thomas O'Connor of the Royal Irish Constabulary and forwarded by him to the museum of the Royal Dublin Society, Dublin.
October 1875Grand Banks , Atlantic Ocean
Found floating at surface; "mostly entirely dead" but small minority "not quite dead, but entirely disabled"ArchiteuthisMultiple; mutilated by birds and fishes to varying degrees, especially limbs; No. 25 missing parts of arms; No. 26 with intact arms and tentaclesNone; cut up for cod baitNo. 25: Filled ~ tub; WT: nearly ; No. 26: TL: ; Howard specimens: BL+HL?: mostly ; BD: ~ ; AL: usually ; AD: "about as large as a man's thigh" ; Tragabigzanda specimens: BL+HL?: None; included Verrill specimen No. 25 and Verrill specimen No. 26Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Frost An unusual number of mostly dead giant squid found by Gloucester, Massachusetts fishermen, with similar number estimated to have been obtained by vessels from other areas. Data from Capt. J.W. Collins of the United States Fish Commission, who at the time of the incident commanded schooner Howard, which collected five specimens. Other involved vessels included schooner Sarah P. Ayer, which took 1–2 specimens; E. R. Nickerson, which harpooned one with intact arms that was "not entirely dead"; and schooner Tragabigzanda, which took three in one afternoon. Some fishermen stated that such "big squids" were also common at the Flemish Cap during the same season. Verrill conjectured that this mass mortality might have been due to an outbreak of disease or parasites, and/or related to their reproductive cycle.
39~1876Clifford Bay, Cape Campbell, New Zealand
Found washed ashoreEntireJaws BL: ; EL: ~ Colonial Museum Robson ; Kirk Pfeffer ; Dell
4020 November 1876Hammer Cove, southwest arm of Green Bay, Notre Dame Bay, Newfoundland
Found washed ashorePartial specimen; devoured by foxes and seabirdsPiece of pen longWH: ; FW: In Harvey's possession; Verrill specimen No. 15 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill M. Harvey letter 25 August 1877 to Verrill; Frost
411877?Norway
Not statedMap location onlySivertsen

24 September 1877Catalina, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland
Found washed ashore, aliveArchiteuthis princeps; Ommastrephes princeps Entire; "nearly perfect specimen"Loose suckers HL+BL: ; BC: ; TL: ; AL: ; AC: ; beak; FW: YPM; catalog nos. , , , . Verrill specimen No. 14 Harvey ; #Anon1877a| ; #Anon1877b| ; #Anon1877c| ; Verrill ; Tryon ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Owen ; Pfeffer ; Frost Measured fresh by M. Harvey; examined preserved by Verrill at New York Aquarium. Later "prepared" for exhibition by taxidermist. Cast made for the AMNH.
43October 1877Trinity Bay, Newfoundland
Not stated"big squid"-None takenNone; Verrill specimen No. 17 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill M. Harvey letter 17 November 1877 to Verrill citing reference to specimen by John Duffet; Frost Specimen cut up and used for manure.

21 November 1877Smith's Sound, Lance Cove, Trinity Bay, Newfoundland
Found washed ashore, alive?Architeuthis princepsEntireNone; carried off by tideBL: ; TL: ; AL: None; Verrill specimen No. 16 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill M. Harvey letter 27 November 1877 to Verrill citing measurements taken by John Duffet; Frost Found still alive, having "ploughed up a trench or furrow about long and of considerable depth by the stream of water that it ejected with great force from its siphon. When the tide receded it died."

2 November 1878near Little Bay Copper Mine, Thimble Tickle, Notre Dame Bay, Newfoundland
Found aground offshore, alive; secured to tree with grapnel and rope; died as tide receded?Architeuthis princepsEntireNone; cut up for dog foodBL+HL: ; TL: None; Verrill specimen No. 18 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill M. Harvey letter 30 January 1879 to Boston Traveller; Holder ; Frost ; Hickey ; Paxton Discovered by Stephen Sherring, fisherman. Often cited as the largest recorded giant squid specimen, and long treated as such by Guinness. The length of the "body from the beak to the extremity of the tail" was said to be, with "one of the arms" measuring, for a total length of . Considered by Paxton as candidate for "longest measured" total length of any giant squid specimen. Total length sometimes mistakenly cited as per Paxton. Giant Squid Interpretation Centre and "life-sized", 55-foot sculpture built near site of capture ; sculpture appeared on Canadian postage stamp issued in 2011.
2 December 1878Three Arms, South Arm of Notre Dame Bay, Newfoundland
Found washed ashore?Architeuthis princepsEntire, mutilated and with arms missing None; cut up for dog foodBL+HL: ; BC: ; AL: ; AD: "thicker than a man's thigh"None; Verrill specimen No. 19 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill M. Harvey letter 30 January 1879 to Boston Traveller; Frost ; Paxton Found dead by fisherman William Budgell after heavy gale. Considered by Paxton as the "longest measured" standard length of any giant squid specimen.

23 May 1879Lyall Bay, Cook Strait, New Zealand
Found washed ashoreSteenstrupia stockii Kirk, 1882 Entire, but somewhat mutilatedPen, beak, tongue, some suckersML: ; BC: ; HL: ; BL+HL: ; HC: ; AL: ; AC: ; ASC: 36; FL: ; FW: ; GL: ; GW: ; other measurementsNMNZ; catalog no. M.125405 + M.125403 ; holotype of Steenstrupia stockii Kirk, 1882. Kirk specimen No. 3Kirk ; Verrill ; Kirk Verrill ; Kirk ; Pfeffer ; Suter ; Dell ; Dell ; Stevens ; Judd ; Paxton Measurements taken by T.W. Kirk. Considered by Paxton as the longest reliably measured mantle length of any giant squid specimen.
1879off Nova Scotia, Canada
From fish stomach, Alepisaurus ferox|Alepidosaurus ferox?Architeuthis megaptera Verrill, 1878; ?Architeuthis harveyi Terminal part of tentacular armPortion of arm longNMNH; catalog no. 576962. Verrill specimen No. 20 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Frost Lancetfish taken by Capt. J.W. Collins of schooner Marion on halibut trawl-line.
49September 1879Olafsfjord, Iceland
ArchiteuthisLeft tentacleTL: 7680+ mm; CL: 1010 mm; CSC: 268; TSC: 290; additional indices and countsZMUC Roeleveld Tentacle morphology examined by Roeleveld.
50October 1879near Brigus, Conception Bay, Newfoundland
Found washed ashoreTwo arms with other mutilated partsUndeterminedAL: None?; Verrill specimen No. 22 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Frost Found after storm. Information provided by Moses Harvey.
511 November 1879James's Cove, Bonavista Bay, Newfoundland
Found at surface, aliveEntireNone; cut up by fishermenEL: ; BL: ; BC: ~; TL: None; Verrill specimen No. 23 Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Morning Chronicle of St. John's 9 December 1879; Frost Found alive and driven ashore.
52Unknown near Boulder Bank, Nelson, New Zealand
Not stated; hook and line?Not indicatedUndetermined longNone?; Kirk specimen No. 4Kirk ; Verrill Newspaper articleCaught by fishing party. No other data.
53Unknown near Flat Point, east coast, New Zealand
Not statedNot indicatedUndetermined-None?; Kirk specimen No. 5Kirk ; Verrill Description sent to Mr. Beetham, M.H.R., by Mr. MooreFound by Mr. Moore. No other data.

April 1880Grand Banks, Newfoundland
Found dead at surfaceArchiteuthis harveyi Head, tentacles, and arms onlyHead, tentacles, and armsTL: ; ASC: 330; extensive measurements and countsYPM; catalog no. 12600y. Verrill specimen No. 24 Verrill ; Verrill Pfeffer ; Frost Found dead by Capt. O.A. Whitten of schooner Wm.H. Oakes. Arm and sucker regeneration documented by Verrill ; one of two published records of limb regeneration in architeuthids, the other being a case of tentacle regeneration in #170.

6 June 1880Island Bay, Cook Strait, New Zealand
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis verrilli Kirk, 1882EntireNot specifiedML: ; BC: ; TL: ; AL: ; AC: ; AL: ; AC: ; ASC: 71; HC: ; HL: ; FL: ; FW: ; EyD: by NMNZ; holotype of Architeuthis verrilli Kirk, 1882; specimen no longer extant Kirk Verrill ; Kirk ; Pfeffer ; Suter ; Dell ; Dell Measurements taken by Kirk, except TL by James McColl. Beak and portions of gladius taken by Italian fishermen and not recovered.
56~1880Kvænangen, Norway
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857Entire--Grieg Sivertsen
57~1880Tønsvik, Tromsøysund, Norway
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857Entire--Grieg
58October 1880Kilkee, County Clare, Ireland
Found washed ashore"octopus"; Architeuthis sp.O'Brien ; Ritchie Rees ; Collins Originally cited as an octopus.
59first week of November 1881on beach, Hennesey's Cove, Long Island, Placentia Bay, Newfoundland
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis princeps?Entire; "much mutilated by crows and other birds"Not stated"very large"; BL+HL: Verrill specimen No. 28Verrill M. Harvey letter 19 December 1881 to VerrillFound by Albert Butcher and George Wareham, "who cut a portion from the head", at uninhabited locality; Verrill considered their estimate of the specimen's length "probably too large". Moses Harvey learned of the specimen from C. D. Chambers, magistrate of Harbour Buffet, Placentia Bay. Only mentioned in Verrill ; overlooked by Ellis, Ellis, and Sweeney & Roper.

10 November 1881Portugal Cove, near St. John's, Newfoundland
Found floating dead near shoreArchiteuthis harveyi EntireEntire BL: ; HL: ; EL: ; BC: b) ML: ; BC: ; FL: ; FW: ; TL: ; CL: ; AL: ; TC: ; additional measurementsE.M. Worth Museum. Verrill specimen No. 27#Anon1881| ; Verrill ; Verrill ; Verrill Morris article in 25 November 1881 New York Herald; Pfeffer Obtained by Mr. Morris, photographed by E. Lyons Inspector Murphy Verrill of fixed specimen. An 1881 specimen from Portugal Cove with a "body" reportedly long, mentioned in the Evening Telegram of St. John's and cited by Frost, presumably refers to the same animal.
30 June 1886Cape Campbell, New Zealand
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis kirkii Robson, 1887EntireBeak and clubML: ; HL: ; AL: ; TL: ; EL: ; BC: ~ NMNZ; catalog no. M.125404 + ?M.125406 ; holotype of Architeuthis kirkii Robson, 1887. Kirk specimen No. 2Kirk ; Verrill ; Robson C.H. Robson letter 19 June 1879 to T.W. Kirk; Pfeffer ; Suter ; Dell ; Dell Found by Mr. C.H. Robson; beak given to Mr. A. Hamilton.

"early" October 1887Lyall Bay, New Zealand
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis longimanus Kirk, 1888EntireBeak and buccal-massFemaleEL: ; ML: ; BC: ; extensive additional measurements and descriptionDominion Museum ; holotype of Architeuthis longimanus Kirk, 1888. Specimen not found Kirk ; Pfeffer Suter ; Dell ; Dell ; Wood ; Ellis ; O'Shea & Bolstad ; Dery ; Paxton Strangely proportioned animal that has been much commented on; sometimes cited as the longest giant squid specimen ever recorded. Considered by Paxton as candidate for "longest measured" total length of any giant squid specimen. Found by Mr. Smith, local fisherman. Measurements taken by T.W. Kirk. Date found listed incorrectly in Dell .
6327 August 1888between Pico and St. George, Azores Islands at 1266 m depth
By benthic trawlArchiteuthis? sp.? Large beakUndetermined-Joubin
641889Norway
Not statedMap location onlySivertsen
65Unknown Sao Miguel Island, Azores Islands
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis princepsEntire?Jaws and tentacle clubBeak measurementsMuseum in Lisbon Girard Pfeffer ; Robson
661892Greenland
Not statedArchiteuthis monachusPosselt
Unknown Talcahuano, Chile
Unknown; collected and donated to ZMB by Ludwig PlateOmmastrephes gigas ; Architeuthis ; Dosidicus gigas EntireEntire, internal parts missing, preserved in alcohol; "exceptionally good condition" Female ML: 865 mm; MW: 230 mm; EL: 1740 mm; HL: 160 mm; HW: 190 mm; FL: 440 mm; FW: 600 mm; TL: 720 mm; CL: 225 mm; AL: 460 mm; AL: 450 mm; AL: 500 mm; AL: 440 mm; LSD: 20 mm ; LSD: 15 mm ; LSD: 14 mm ; EyD: 80 mm; Lens: 35 mmZMB Moll. 49.804Martens ; Glaubrecht & Salcedo-Vargas Möbius ; Möbius ; #Anon1899| ; #Anon1902a| ; Kilias ; Wechsler Non-architeuthid. On public display. First noted by Carl Eduard von Martens in November 1894. Exhibited at Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin from 1897 to World War II, and again from 1945–50, when it was housed in main entrance hall in large glass cylinder on marble pedestal. From December 1975, displayed as part of "Meeresungeheuer" exhibit at German Maritime Museum in Stralsund, on loan from ZMB. Return to museum noted in February 1992, when it was placed in new purpose-built container and displayed in Malacological Collection. Incorrectly identified by Kilias as Architeuthis in figure legend, with total length given as ~2 m. Specimen cast in 1997–98 for creation of 8.5-m-long plastic "giant squid" model, exhibited since 1998 at Übersee-Museum Bremen with sperm whale skull. Re-identified as Dosidicus gigas in June 1998 by Mario Alejandro Salcedo-Vargas. Internal parts apparently removed when specimen originally dissected by Martens or prepared for exhibition.

4 February 1895Bay of Tateyama [Tokyo Bay], Province of Awa, Japan
In netArchiteuthis japonica Pfeffer, 1912EntireUndeterminedFemaleML: 720 mm; MW: 235 mm; GL: 640 mm; FL: 280 mm; FW: 200 mm; TL: 2910 mm; extensive additional measurements and descriptionUndetermined; ?Zoological Institute, Science College, Tokyo; holotype of Architeuthis japonica Pfeffer, 1912Mitsukuri & Ikeda ; Pfeffer Sasaki Caught in net after 2–3-day storm.

18 July 1895near Angra, Azores Islands
Caught at surface using shrimp netDubioteuthis physeteris Joubin, 1900 Mantle onlyMantleMaleML: 460 mm; BD: 115 mm; FL: 220 mm; FW: 110 mm; GL: 390 mmMOM; holotype of Dubioteuthis physeteris Joubin, 1900 Joubin ; Pfeffer Hardy ; Roper & Young ; Toll & Hess

18 July 1895near Angra, Azores Islands
Caught at surface with shrimp netArchiteuthis sp.?; Non-architeuthid Several jawsUndetermined-Joubin Pfeffer ; Clarke Non-architeuthid.

10 April 1896Kirkseteroren, Hevnefjord, Norway
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857EntireEntireFemaleBL: 2.5 m; AL: 2.5 m; TL: 7.25 mVSMStorm ; Grieg Brinkmann ; Nordgård ; Nordgård ; Sivertsen

27 September 1896 Kirkseteroren, Hevnefjord, Norway
Found washed ashoreArchiteuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857EntireEntire, posterior part missingMaleTL: 1030+ mm; CL: 900 mm; CSC: 294; TSC: >298; LRL: 17.9 mm; URL: 16.2 mm; additional beak measurements, indices, and countsVSM; VSM 110a Storm ; Grieg ; Roeleveld ; Roeleveld Brinkmann ; Nordgård ; Nordgård ; Sivertsen ; Toll & Hess Beak morphometrics studied by Roeleveld. Tentacle morphology examined by Roeleveld.
71Unknown Iceland
Not statedArchiteuthis monachus''Not specifiedUndetermined-Posselt Bardarson

Type specimens

The following table lists the nominal species-level taxa associated with the genus Architeuthis, together with their corresponding type specimens, type localities, and type repositories. Binomial names are listed alphabetically by specific epithet and presented in their original combinations.
Binomial name and author citationSystematic statusType localityType specimen and type repository
Loligo bouyeri Crosse & Fischer, 1862:138Architeuthid? Canary Islands? Unresolved
Architeuthis clarkei Robson, 1933:682, text-figs. 1–7, pl. 1UndeterminedScarborough Beach, Yorkshire, England BMNH Holotype 1933.1.30.5 + 1926.3.31.24
Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857:183Nomen tantum
Architeuthis dux Steenstrup in [|Harting, 1860:11], pl. 1 fig. 1AValid species ZMUC Holotype
Plectoteuthis grandis Owen, 1881:156, pls. 34–35Architeuthis sp. Not indicated BMNH Holotype
Loligo hartingii Verrill, 1875b:86, fig. 28Valid species; Architeuthis hartingii Not indicated University of Utrecht as Architeuthis dux, identification by Harting
Megaloteuthis harveyi Kent, 1874a:181Architeuthis sp.Conception Bay, Newfoundland YPM Type 12600y
Architeuthis japonica Pfeffer, 1912:27UndeterminedTokyo Bay, Japan Undetermined; Holotype
Architeuthis kirkii Robson, 1887:155Architeuthis stockii Cape Campbell, New Zealand NMNZ Holotype M.125404 + ?M.125406
Architeuthis longimanus Kirk, 1888:34, pls. 7–9Architeuthis stockii Lyall Bay, New Zealand NMNZ Holotype; specimen not located
Megateuthis martensii Hilgendorf, 1880:67Valid species; Architeuthis martensii Yedo Japan fish market, Japan ZMB Moll. 34716 + 38980
Architeuthis megaptera Verrill, 1878:207Non-architeuthid; Sthenoteuthis pteropus Nova Scotia, Canada NSMC 1870–Z-2
Architeuthis? monachus Steenstrup, 1857:184Nomen tantum
Architeuthis monachus Steenstrup in Harting, 1860:11Architeuthis dux Steenstrup, 1857 Raabjerg Strand; Northwest coast of Jutland, Denmark ZMUC Holotype
Architeuthis mouchezi Vélain, 1875:1002Nomen nudum; see Mouchezis sancti-pauli
Architeuthis nawaji Cadenat, 1935:513UndeterminedÎle d'Yeu, Bay of Biscay, France Unresolved
Dubioteuthis physeteris Joubin, 1900:102, pl. 15Valid species; Architeuthis physeteris Azores ; from sperm whale stomach MOM Holotype ; Syntypes Verrill specimen No. 10, upper and lower beak)
Dinoteuthis proboscideus More, 1875a:4527Architeuthis sp. Dingle, County Kerry, Ireland Unresolved
Mouchezis sancti-pauli Vélain, 1877:81, text-fig. 8Valid species; Architeuthis sanctipauli on beach, St. Paul Island, South Indian Ocean MNHN Holotype 3-2-658 and 3-2-659
Steenstrupia stockii Kirk, 1882:286, pl. 36 figs. 2–4Valid species; Architeuthis stockii Cook Strait, New Zealand NMNZ Holotype M.125405 + M.125403
Architeuthis titan Steenstrup in Verrill, 1875b:84 Nomen nudum
Architeuthis verrilli Kirk, 1882:284, pl. 36 fig. 1Species dubium Island Bay, Cook Strait, New Zealand NMNZ Holotype;

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in the List of giant squid table.

Oceanic sectors

Oceanic sectors used in the main table follow Sweeney & Roper : the Atlantic Ocean is divided into sectors at the equator and 30°W, the Pacific Ocean is divided at the equator and 180°, and the Indian Ocean is defined as the range 20°E to 115°E. An additional category has been created to accommodate the handful of specimens recorded from the Mediterranean Sea.
Abbreviations used for measurements and counts follow Sweeney & Roper and are based on standardised acronyms in teuthology, primarily those defined by Roper & Voss, with the exception of several found in older references. Following Sweeney & Roper, the somewhat non-standard EL and WL are used in place of the more common TL and SL, respectively.
Institutional acronyms follow Sweeney & Roper and are primarily those defined by Leviton et al., Leviton & Gibbs, and Sabaj. Where the acronym is unknown, the full repository name is listed.
The following images relate to pre–20th century giant squid specimens and sightings. The number below each image corresponds to that given in the List of giant squid table and is linked to the relevant record therein. The date on which the specimen was first documented is also given.

Explanatory footnotes

Full citations

A