Final consonants are transcribed according to pronunciation, not Thai orthography. Vowels are transcribed in the position in the word where they are pronounced, not as in Thai orthography. Implied vowels, which are not written in Thai orthography, are transcribed as pronounced. A hyphen is used to avoid ambiguity in syllable separation before a succeeding syllable that starts with a vowel and before if the preceding syllable ends with a vowel. Transcribed words are written with spaces between them although there are no spaces in Thai. For example, "สถาบันไทยคดีศึกษา" Institute of Thai Studies is transcribed as "Sathaban Thai Khadi Sueksa". However, compounds and names of persons are written without spaces between words. For example, "ลูกเสือ" is transcribed as "luksuea", not "luk suea", and "โชคชัย จิตงาม", the first and last names of a person, is transcribed as "Chokchai Chitngam", not "Chok Chai Chit Ngam".
Transcription table
For consonants, the transcriptions are given for both initial and final position in the syllable. For vowels, a dash indicates the relative position of the vowel's initial consonant.
Consonants
Vowels
-
History
There have been four versions of the RTGS, those promulgated in 1932, 1939, 1968 and 1999. The general system was issued by the Ministry of Public Instruction in 1932, and subsequent issues have been issued by the Royal Institute of Thailand.
Table of changes
1932 version
The general system was set up by a committee of the Ministry of Public Instruction on the following principles:
The general system should be expandable to the precise system.
The general system should be based on pronunciation, and one sound should be represented by one symbol or letter.
The general system should be in consonance with the principles of Thai grammar, orthography, and pronunciation.
In selecting symbols or letters, account should be taken of existing types for printing and typewriting and of existing systems of transcription.
The committee considered that for the general system, tone and quantity marks were unneeded. They would be provided for the precise system. The marks are accents above the vowels, one reason that the vowel symbols used to have no marks above them.
1939 version
The 1939 issue allowed short vowels to be marked with a breve where expedient. By contrast, the ALA-LC uses the 1939 version with the addition of a macron for long vowels and a spiritus asper to transliterate อ as a consonant. The changes in vowel notation copied existing usage and IPA notation.
Relationship to precise system
The precise system was issued along with the general system in 1939. A transliteration in the precise system could be converted to the general system by doing the following:
Removing ḥ, which corresponds to ะ, which may be viewed as a length mark
Removing the character distinguishing dots below and primes
Changing ay and aiy to ai except before vowels
Changing č to čh
Changing ie to ia, uo to ua and ưœ to ưa
The last set of changes removes a graphic distinction between vowels in closed syllables and vowels in open syllables. The h is added to č in the general system to make it easier to read. When the diacritic was subsequently removed, the h was justified as avoiding the misreading of the transliteration as or rather than the correct.
[|1968 version]
The 1968 version removed diacritics, including the horn of ư and replaced the ligatures æ and œ by ae and oe. While that is more suitable as the standard transliteration for maps, it removed the contrast between the transcriptions of จ and ช, อึ and อุ, เอือ and อัว, and โอ and ออ.
1999 version
The 1999 version restored the distinction between the transcriptions of the pairs อึ and อุ and เอือ and อัว. It also simplified the transliteration of final ว, which now is always transcribed .
Allowed variants
The following variants have been allowed:
Preferred form
čh
æ
œ
ǫ
ơ
ư
Alternative
ĉh
ae
oe
o̦
oʼ
uʼ
Criticism
The system does not transcribe all features of Thai phonology. Particularly it has the following shortcomings:
The notation does not differentiate between IPA and IPA . Using for would have been more consistent with the other stops and is used as such in ISO 11940-2.
The notation does not differentiate between IPA and IPA .
The [|original design] envisioned the general system to give broad details of pronunciation, and the precise system to supplement that with vowel lengths, tones, and specific Thai characters used. The ambiguity of and was introduced in the 1968 version.
