Test oracle


In computing, software engineering, and software testing, a test oracle is a mechanism for determining whether a test has passed or failed. The use of oracles involves comparing the output of the system under test, for a given test-case input, to the output that the oracle determines that product should have. The term "test oracle" was first introduced in a paper by William E. Howden. Additional work on different kinds of oracles was explored by Elaine Weyuker.
Oracles often operate separately from the system under test. However, method postconditions are part of the system under test, as automated oracles in design by contract models. Determining the correct output for a given input is known as the oracle problem or test oracle problem, which is a much harder problem than it seems, and involves working with problems related to controllability and observability. Various methods have been proposed to alleviate the test oracle problem. A popular technique is metamorphic testing.

Categories

A research literature survey covering 1978 to 2012 found several potential categorisations for test oracles.

Specified

These oracles are typically associated with formalised approaches to software modelling and software code construction. They are connected to formal specification, model-based design which may be used to generate test oracles, state transition specification for which oracles can be derived to aid model-based testing and protocol conformance testing, and design by contract for which the equivalent test oracle is an assertion.
Specified Test Oracles have a number of challenges. Formal specification relies on abstraction, which in turn may naturally have an element of imprecision as all models cannot capture all behaviour.

Derived

A derived test oracle differentiates correct and incorrect behaviour by using information derived from artefacts of the system. These may include documentation, system execution results and characteristics of versions of the system under test. Regression test suites are an example of a derived test oracle - they are built on the assumption that the result from a previous system version can be used as aid for a future system version. Previously measured performance characteristics may be used as an oracle for future system versions, for example, to trigger a question about observed potential performance degradation. Textual documentation from previous system versions may be used as a basis to guide expectations in future system versions.
A pseudo-oracle falls into the category of derived test oracle. A pseudo-oracle, as defined by Weyuker, is a separately written program which can take the same input as the program/system under test so that their outputs may be compared to understand if there might be a problem to investigate.

Implicit

An implicit test oracle relies on implied information and assumptions. For example, there may be some implied conclusion from a program crash, i.e. unwanted behaviour - an oracle to determine that there may be a problem. There are a number of ways to search and test for unwanted behaviour, whether some call it negative testing, where there are specialized subsets such as fuzzing.
There are limitations in implicit test oracles - as they rely on implied conclusions and assumptions. For example, a program/process crash may not be a priority issue if the system is a fault-tolerant system and so operating under a form of self-healing/self-management. Implicit test oracles may be susceptible to false positives due to environment dependencies.

Human

When specified, derived or implicit test oracles cannot be used, then human input to determine the test oracles is required. These can be thought of as quantitative and qualitative approaches.
These can be guided by heuristic approaches, i.e. gut instinct, rule of thumb, checklist aids and experience to help tailor the specific combination selected for the program/system under test.

Examples

Common oracles include: